This study assesses the first 4.5 years of an effort by a foundation in Chicago to promote children and adolescents’ social and academic development as part of a comprehensive community initiative. The authors examine the potential and challenges associated with the foundation’s strategy of developing social capital within a network of schools and community organizations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Brown, P. , & Garg, S. (1997). Foundations and comprehensive community initiatives: The challenges of partnership. Chicago: The Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
2.
Bryk, A. S. , Sebring, P. B., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S., & Easton, J. Q. (1998). Charting Chicago school reform: Democratic localism as a lever for change. Boulder, CO: Westview.
3.
Chaskin, R. J. (1992). The Ford Foundation’s neighborhood and family initiative: Toward a model of comprehensive, neighborhood-based development. Chicago: The Chapin Hall Center for Children at the University of Chicago.
4.
Chen, H. (1990). Theory-driven evaluations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
5.
Cibulka, J. , & Kritek, W. (Eds.). (1996). Coordination among schools, families, and communities: Prospects for educational reform. New York: State University of New York Press.
6.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 95-120.
7.
Connell, J. P. , Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B., & Weiss, C. H. (Eds.). (1995). New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods and contexts. Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
8.
Elmore, R. F. , & Burney, D. (1997, August). Investing in teacher learning: Staff development and instructional improvement in Community School District No. 2, New York City. Philadelphia: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future, Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
9.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: The Free Press.
10.
Hess, G. A. (1999). Expectations, opportunity, capacity, and will: The four essential components of Chicago school reform. Educational Policy, 13(4), 494-517.
11.
Honig, M. I. , Kahne, J., & McLaughlin, M. W. (2001). School-community connections: Strengthening opportunities to learn and opportunities to teach. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
12.
Jacobs, J. (1961). The death and life of great American cities. New York: Vintage.
13.
Jordan, A. (1994). Lessons from community-based initiatives: A working document. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
14.
Kahne, J. , & Bailey, K. (1999). The role of social capital in youth development: The case of “I Have a Dream.”Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 21(3), 321-343.
15.
Kahne, J. , Nagaoka, J., Brown, A., O’Brien, J., Quinn, T., & Thiede, K. (2001). Assessing after-school programs as contexts for youth development. Youth & Society, 32(4), 421-446.
16.
Kubisch, A. C. , Weiss, C. H., Schorr, L. B., & Connell, J. P. (1995). Introduction. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Concepts, methods, and contexts (pp. 1-22). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
17.
Miles, M. B. , & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18.
O’Brien, J., & Kahne, J. (1999). Literacy program evaluation. Internal report.
19.
O’Connor, A. (1996). Community action, urban reform, and the fight against poverty: The Ford Foundation’s gray areas program. Journal of Urban History, 22(5), 586-626.
20.
Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21.
Quinn, T. , & Kahne, J. (2001). Wide awake to the world: Youth, community artists, and urban schools. Curriculum Inquiry, 31(1), 11-32.
22.
Sarason, S. (1996). Revisiting the culture of school and the problem of change. New York: Teachers College Press.
23.
Shipps, D. , Kahne, J., & Smiley, M. A. (1999). The politics of urban school reform: Legitimacy, city growth, and school improvement in Chicago. Educational Policy, 13(4), 518-545.
24.
Shirley, D. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
25.
Sizer, T. R. (1984). Horace’s compromise: The dilemma of the American high school. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
Smrekar, C. E. (1996). The Kentucky Family Resource Centers: The challenges of remaking family-school interactions. In J. G. Cibulka & W. J. Kritek (Eds.), Coordination among schools, families and communities: Prospects for educational reform. New York: State University of New York Press.
27.
Smrekar, C. E. , & Mawhinney, H. B. (1999). Integrated services: Challenges in linking schools, families, and communities. In J. Murphy & K. Seashore Louis (Eds.), Handbook of educational administration (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28.
Smylie, M. A. , Crowson, R. L., Chou, V., & Levin, R. A. (1994). The principal and community-school connections in Chicago’s radical reform. Educational Administration Quarterly, 30(3), 342-364.
29.
Wehlage, G. , Smith, G., & Lipman, P. (1992). Restructuring urban schools: The New Futures Experience. American Educational Research Journal, 29(1), 51-93.
30.
Weiss, C. (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory: Exploring theory-based evaluation for comprehensive community initiatives for children and families. In J. P. Connell, A. C. Kubisch, L. B. Schorr, & C. H. Weiss (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 65-92). Washington, DC: The Aspen Institute.
31.
White, J. A. , & Wehlage, G. (1995). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard to do?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1), 23-38.
