Empowerment is defined and measured in terms of teachers’ power to control critical decisions about teaching and learning conditions. This research first considers the relationship between school climate and teacher empowerment and then the relationship between teacher empowerment and school effectiveness, which includes measures of mathematics and reading achievement in 86 middle schools. The results support the pivotal importance of teacher empowerment in the effectiveness of schools. Finally, a theoretical model is proposed to explain the linkages between organizational characteristics and student achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, W. M. , & George, P. S. (1981). The exemplary middle school. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
2.
Allutto, J. A. , & Belasco, J. A. (1973). Patterns of teacher participation in school system decision making. Educational Administration Quarterly, 9, 27-41.
3.
Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate: A review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52, 368-420.
4.
Bacharach, S. B. , Bamberger, P., Conley, S. C., & Bauer, S. (1990). The dimensionality of decision participation in educational organizations: The value of multi-domain educative approach. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 126-167.
5.
Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117-148.
6.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
7.
Blase, J. , & Blase, J. (1994). Empowering teachers: What is successful, shared, governance, principals do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
8.
Blase, J. , & Blase, J. (1996). Facilitative school leadership and teacher empowerment: Teachers’ perspectives. Social Psychology of Education, 1, 117-145.
9.
Blase, J. , & Blase, J. (1999). Implementation of shared governance for instructional improvement: Principals’ perspectives. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 476-500.
10.
Bossert, S. T. (1988). School effects. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 341-352). New York: Longman.
11.
Bredeson, F. V. (1989). Redefining leadership and the roles of schools: Responses to changes in the professional work-life of teachers. The High School Journal, 23, 9-20.
12.
Brookover, W. B. , Schweitzer, J. H., Schneider, J. M., Beady, C. H., Flood, P. K., & Wisenbaker, J. M. (1978). Elementary school social climate and school achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 15, 301-318.
13.
Bryk, A. S. , Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
14.
Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development . (1989). Turning points: Preparing American youth for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Carnegie Council on Adolescent Development, Task Force on Education of Young Adolescents.
15.
Cawelti, G. (1988, November). Middle schools a better match with early adolescent needs, ASCD survey finds. ASCD Curriculum Update, pp. 1-12.
16.
Conley, S. (1991). Review of the literature on teacher participation in school decision making. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 17, pp. 225-265). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
17.
Conley, S. C. , & Bacharach, S. B. (1990). From school site-management to participatory site-management. Phi Delta Kappan, 72, 539-544.
18.
Corwin, R. G. , & Borman, K. M. (1988). School as workplace: Structural constraints on administration. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 209-237). New York: Longman.
19.
Dickinson, T. S. , & McEwin, C. K. (1998). The origins and meaning of the middle school concept: A century of development. In P. S. Hlebowitsh & W. G. Wraga (Eds.), Annual review of research for school leaders 1998 (pp. 3-23). New York: Simon & Schuster.
20.
DiPaola, M. F. , & Hoy, W. K. (1994). Teacher militancy: A professional check on bureaucracy. The Journal of Research and Development in Education, 27, 78-82.
21.
Duke, D. L. , Showers, B. K., & Imber, M. (1980). Teachers and shared decision making: The costs and benefits of involvement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 16, 93-106.
22.
Firestone, W. A. , & Bader, B. D. (1991). Professionalism or bureaucracy? Redesigning teaching. Educational Analysis and Policy Evaluation, 13(1), 67-87.
23.
Gamoran, A. , Porter, A. C., & Gahng, T. (1996). Teacher environment: A policy search of theory and evidence. In W. J. Folwer, B. Levin, & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Organizational influences on educational productivity (Vol. 5, pp. 175-193). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
24.
Goddard, R. D. , Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk Hoy, A. (in press). Collective teacher efficacy: Its meaning, measure, and impact on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal.
25.
Goodman, P. S. , & Pennings, J. M. (1977). Toward a workable framework. In P. S. Goodman & J. M. Pennings (Eds.), New perspectives on organizational effectiveness (pp. 147-184). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
26.
Halpin, A. W. , & Croft, D. B. (1963). The organizational climate of schools. Chicago: Midwest Administration Center of the University of Chicago.
27.
Heck, R. H. , Larsen, T. J., & Marcoulides, G. A. (1990). Instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a casual model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
28.
Hoy, W. K. , & Ferguson, J. (1985). A theoretical framework and exploration of organizational effectiveness in schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21, 117-134.
29.
Hoy, W. K. , Hannum, J., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 336-359.
30.
Hoy, W. K. , Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., & Bliss, J. R. (1996). The organizational climate of middle schools: The development and test of the OCDQ-RM. Journal of Educational Administration, 34, 41-59.
31.
Hoy, W. K. , & Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
32.
Hoy, W. K. , & Sabo, D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
33.
Hoy, W. K. , Tarter, C. J., & Bliss, J. (1990). Organizational climate, school health, and effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 260-279.
34.
Hoy, W. K. , Tarter, C. J., & Kottkamp, R. B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
35.
Kanter, R. M. (1983). The change masters: Innovation and entrepreneurship in the American corporation. New York: Simon & Schuster.
36.
Lightfoot, S. L. (1986). On goodness in schools: Themes of empowerment. Peabody Journal of Education, 63(3), 9-28.
37.
Lipham, J. M. (1974). Improving the decision-making skills of the principal. In J. A. Culbertson, C. Henson, & R. Morrison (Eds.), Performance objectives for school principals. Berkley, CA: McCutchan.
38.
Louis, K. S. , Marks, H. M., & Kruse, S. D. (1996). Teachers’ professional community in restructuring schools. American Journal of Education, 33, 757-798.
39.
Lugg, C. A. , & Boyd, W. L. (1993). Leadership for collaboration: Reducing risk and fostering resilience. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 252-258.
40.
Malen, B. , & Ogawa, R. T. (1988). Site-based management: Disconcerting policy issues, critical policy, and choices. In J. J. Lane & E. G. Epps (Eds.), Restructuring the schools: Problems and prospects (pp. 185-206). Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
41.
Malen, B. , Ogawa, R. T., & Kranz, J. (1990). What do we know about school-based management? A case study of the literature—A call for research. In W. H. Clune & J. F. White (Eds.), Choice and control in American education, Volume 2: The practice of choice, decentralization and school restructuring (pp. 289-342). New York: Falmer.
42.
Marks, H. M. , & Louis, K. S. (1997). Does teacher empowerment affect the classroom? The implications of teacher empowerment for instructional practice and student academic performance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 245-275.
43.
Midgley, C. , & Wood, S. (1993). Beyond site-based management: Empowering teachers to reform schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 245-252.
44.
Miles, M. B. (1969). Planned change and organizational health: Figure and ground. In F. D. Carver & T. J. Sergiovanni (Eds.), Organizations and human behavior (pp. 375-391). New York: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Miskel, C. , Fevurly, R., & Stewart, J. (1979). Organizational structures and processes, perceived school effectiveness, loyalty, and job satisfaction. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15, 97-118.
46.
Miskel, C. , McDonald, D., & Bloom, S. (1983). Structural and expectancy linkages within schools and organizational effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 19, 49-82.
47.
Mott, P. (1972). Characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper & Row.
48.
Murphy, J. , Weil, M., Hallinger, P., & Mitman, A. (1982). Academic press: Translating high expectations into school policies and classroom practices. Educational Leadership, 40, 22-26.
49.
Newmann, F. M. (1993). Beyond common sense in educational restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational Researcher, 22, 4-13, 22-22.
50.
Pace, C. R. , & Stern, G. C. (1958). An approach to the measure of psychological characteristics of college environments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 49, 269-277.
51.
Parsons, T. (1967). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In A. W. Halpin (Ed.), Administrative theory in education (pp. 40-72). New York: Macmillan.
52.
Parsons, T. , Bales, R. F., & Shils, E. A. (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
53.
Poole, M. S. (1985). Communication and organizational climates: Review, critique, and a new perspective. In R. D. McPhee & P. K. Tompkins (Eds.), Organizational communications: Traditional themes and new directions (pp. 79-108). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
54.
Purkey, S. C. , & Smith, M. S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. The Elementary School Journal, 83, 427-452.
55.
Rice, M. E. , & Schneidner, G. T. (1994). A decade of teacher empowerment: An empirical analysis of teacher involvement in decision making, 1980-1991. Journal of Educational Administration, 32, 43-58.
56.
Rinehart, J. S. , & Short, P. M. (1991). Viewing reading recovery as restructuring phenomenon. Journal of School Leadership, 1, 370-399.
57.
Rinehart, J. S. , & Short, P. M. (1994). Job satisfaction and empowerment among teacher leaders, reading recovery teachers, and regular classroom teachers. Education, 114, 570-580.
58.
Rinehart, J. S. , Short, P. M., & Johnson, P. E. (1997). Empowerment and conflict at school-based and non-school-based sites in the United States. Journal of International Studies in Educational Administration, 25, 77-87.
59.
Rinehart, J. S. , Short, P. M., Short, R. J., & Eckley, M. (1998). Teacher empowerment and principal leadership: Understanding the influence process. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 608-630.
60.
Rokeach, M. (1960). The open and closed mind. New York: Basic Books.
61.
Rowan, B. (1990). Commitment and control: Alternative strategies for the organizational design of schools. In C. B. Cazcen (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 16, pp. 353-389). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
62.
Schermerhorn, J. R. , Hunt, J. G., & Osborn, R. N. (1994). Managing organizational behavior. New York: Wiley.
63.
Scott, W. R. (1998). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open systems (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
64.
Short, P. M. , & Greer J. T. (1997). Leadership in empowered schools: Themes from innovative efforts. Columbus, OH: Prentice Hall.
65.
Short, P. M. , & Rinehart, J. S. (1992). School participant empowerment scale: Assessment of level of empowerment within the school environment. Journal of Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 951-960.
66.
Short, P. M. , & Rinehart, J. S. (1993). Teacher empowerment and school climate. Education, 113, 592-597.
67.
Sirianni, C. (1987). Worker participation in the late twentieth century: Some critical issues. In C. Sirianni (Ed.), Worker participation and the politics of reform (pp. 3-33). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
68.
Sirotnik, K. A. (1980). Psychometric implications of the unit-of-analysis problem (with examples from the measurement of organizational climate). Journal of Educational Measurement, 17, 245-282.
69.
Smylie, M. A. (1994). Redesigning teachers’ work: Connections to the classroom. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of educational research (Vol. 20, pp. 129-177). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
70.
Stedman, L. C. (1987). It’s time we changed the effective schools formula. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 214-224.
71.
Steers, R. M. (1977). Organizational effectiveness: A behavioral view. Santa Monica, CA: Goodyear.
72.
Stern, G. G. (1970). People in context: Measuring person-environment in education and industry. New York: Wiley.
73.
Tagiuri, R. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. In R. Tagiuri & G. W. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational climate: Explorations of a concept (pp. 1-32). Boston: Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard University.
74.
Taylor, D. L. , & Bogotch, I. E. (1994). School-level effects of teachers’ participation in decision making. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 16, 302-319.
75.
Uline, C. L. , Miller, D. M., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34, 462-484.
76.
Wall, R. , & Rinehart, J. S. (1998). School-based decision making and the empowerment of secondary school teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 8, 49-64.
77.
White, P. A. (1992). Teacher empowerment under “ideal” school-site autonomy. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14, 69-82.
78.
Wu, Y. (1994). Perceptions of teacher empowerment, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment in public schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University.
