This article is part of an American Educational Resource Association Division A task force focus on how to improve the research base and knowledge production in educa-tional administration. It represents an exploratory study of the potential for educational administrators to generate knowledge out of their own practice settings. The database consists of published articles, dissertation abstracts, and interviews with administrator researchers. The study describes the various topics they studied, the methods they used, and the practical, epistemological, and political dilemmas they encountered. Unlike the traditional notion of a knowledge base that is created by formal researchers and then dis-seminated to practice settings, the authors argue that insider research is both created and used in the same setting and therefore represents a powerful lever for personal, pro-fessional, and organizational transformation. A discussion is provided on the use of both outsider and insider research and how together they can contribute to a rethinking of the notion of a knowledge base in educational administration.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, D. , & Biddle, B.(Eds.). (1991). Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research. London: Falmer.
2.
Anderson, G. L. (1989). Critical ethnography in education: Origins, current practices, and new directions. Review of Educational Research, 59, 249-270.
3.
Anderson, G. L. (1990). Toward a critical constructivist approach to school administration: Invisibility, legitimation, and the study of non-events. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26(1), 38-59.
4.
Anderson, G. L. (1991). The cognitive politics of teachers and principals: Ideological control in an elementary school. In J. Blase (Ed.), The politics of life in schools. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
5.
Anderson, G. L. , & Grinberg, J. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary prac tice: Appropriating Foucault’s view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administra-tion Quarterly, 34(3), 329-353.
6.
Anderson, G. L. , & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-21.
7.
Anderson, G. L. , Herr, K., & Nihlen, A. (1994). Studying your own school: An educator’s guide to qualitative practitioner research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8.
Anderson, G. L. , & Saavedra, E. (1995). Insider’s narratives of transformative learning: Implications for educational reform. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(2), 228-235.
9.
Anderson, M. (1994). The relationship between teacher absenteeism, teachers’ sense of self-effi-cacy and workplace environments of elementary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State University of New York, Buffalo.
10.
Argyris, C. , & Schon, D. (1974). Theory and practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11.
Argyris, C. , Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12.
Battaglia, C. (1995). Confused on a higher level about more important things. In S. Noffke & R. Stevenson(Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 74-91). New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Beck, W. (1982). An investigation of leader behavior: Integrating theory and practice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fairleigh Dickinson University.
14.
Bone, D. (1996). Quality management is collegiate management: Improving practice in a specialschool. In P. Lomax (Ed.), Quality management in education: Sustaining the vision through action research (pp. 152-165). London: Routledge.
15.
Campbell, D. T. , & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. Dallas, TX: Houghton Mifflin.
16.
Carr, W. , & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical. London: Falmer.
17.
Carter, K. (1993). The place of story in the study of teaching and teacher education. Educational Researcher, 22(1), 5-12.
18.
Christman, J. , Hirshman, J., Holtz, A., Perry, H., Spelkoman, R., & Williams, M. (1995). Doing Eve’s work:Women principals write about their practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 26(2), 213-227.
19.
Clift, R. , Veal, M. L., Holland, P., Johnson, M., & McCarthy, J. (1995). Collaborative leadership and shared decision-making: Teachers, principals, and university professors. New York: Teachers College Press.
20.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. (1993). Inside-outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
21.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. (1998). Teacher research: The question that persists. Interna-tional Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 19-36.
22.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.
23.
Connelly, F. M. , & Clandenin, J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
24.
Culbertson, J. (1981). Three epistemologies and the study of educational administration. UCEA Review, 22(1), 1-6.
25.
Cunningham, J. B. (1993). Action research and organizational development. Westport, CT: Praeger.
26.
Diaz, R. (1994). Nurturing the champions: The principal’s role in reshaping, reinforcing, and embedding cultural change. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University.
27.
DuFour, R. , & Eaker, R. (1998). Professional learning communities at work. Alexandria, VA: Association of Supervision and Curriculum Development.
28.
Donmoyer, R. , Imber, M., & Scheurich, J.(Eds.). (1995). The knowledge base in educational administration: Multiple perspectives. Albany: State University of New York Press.
29.
Doolittle, G. , Nablo, S., & Carbone,T. (1998). The big house. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 380-396.
30.
Duke, N. K. , & Beck, S. W. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 31-36.
31.
Duncan, P. (1993). Renewal: The story of a woman’s first year in central office. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas.
32.
Edmonds, R. (1979). Some schools work and more can. Social Policy, 9, 28-32.
33.
Evans, M. (1995). An action research enquiry into reflection in action as part of my role as a dep-uty head teacher. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kingston, UK.
34.
Evans, M. (1997). Shifting the leadership focus from control to empowerment: A case study. School Leadership and Management, 17(2), 273-283.
35.
Evans, M. (1998). Using story to promote continuing professional development for teachers. Journal of In-service Education, 24(1), 47-55.
36.
Evers, C. , & Lakomski, G. (Eds.). (1996). Special issue: Postpositivist conceptions of science in educational administration. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 379-402.
37.
Feldman, A. , & Atkin, J. M. (1995). Embedding action research in professional practice. In S. Noffke & R. Stevenson(Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically critical (pp. 127-137). New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
Fenstermacher, G. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3-56.
39.
Foster, W. (Ed.). (1998). Special issue: Postmodernism. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3).
40.
Frank, C. (1999). Ethnographic eyes: A teacher’s guide to classroom observation. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
41.
Garza, E. (1998). Life histories of academically successful migrant students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
42.
Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic.
43.
Gibson, R. (1985). Critical times for action research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 15(1), 59-64.
44.
Goodlad, J. (1999). Teachers as moral stewards of our schools. Journal for a Just and Caring Education, 5(3), 237-241.
45.
Groundwater-Smith, S. (1988). Credential bearing enquiry-based courses: Paradox or new challenge. In J. Nias & S. Groundwater-Smith(Eds.), The enquiring teacher: Supporting and sustaining teacher research (pp. 256-262). London: Falmer.
46.
Habermas, J. (1971). Knowledge and human interests. Boston: Beacon.
47.
Hammack, F. M. (1997). Ethical issues in teacher research. Teachers College Record, 99(2), 247-265.
48.
Holtz, A. (forthcoming). Matters of principal. New York: Teachers College Press.
49.
Huberman, M. (1996). Focus on research moving mainstream: Taking a closer look at teacher research. Language Arts, 73(2), 124-140.
50.
Jacobson, S. , Hickcox, E., & Stevenson, R.(Eds.). (1996). School administration: Persistent dilemmas in preparation and practice. Westport, CT: Praeger.
51.
Johnson, R. S. (1996). Setting our sights: Measuring equity in school change. Los Angeles: The Achievement Council.
52.
Jonas, J. (1996). Implementation of a school worksite health promotion program: Factors associated with concept, context, and process. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
53.
Jones, F. (1993). Project Pipeline: A hermeneutic approach for recruiting underrepresented American mathematics and science teachers into the public school workforce. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of San Francisco.
54.
Lee, G. , & Storms, B. A. (1999). Evolving conceptions of school leadership: Preparing adminis-trators for cultures of inquiry. Educational Leadership and Administration: Teaching and Program Development, 11(1), 71-82.
55.
Leonard, R. (1997). A case study of the action research process in a school for at-risk students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and University.
56.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
57.
Lincoln, Y. , & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
58.
Lindblom, C. (1995). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
59.
Loftus, J. (1996). Enhancing the image of a first school in the immediate and wider community. In P. Lomax (Ed.), Quality management in education: Sustaining the vision through action research (pp. 152-165). London: Routledge.
60.
Lomax,P. (Ed.). (1991). Managing better schools and colleges: The action research way. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters LTD.
61.
Lomax, P. , Woodward, C., & Parker, Z. (1996). How can we help educational managers establish and implement effective “critical” friendships? In P. Lomax (Ed.), Quality management in education: Sustaining the vision through action research (pp. 152-165). London: Routledge.
62.
Losito, B. , Pozzo, G., & Somekh, B. (1998). Exploring the labyrinth of first and second order inquiry in action research. Educational Action Research, 6(2), 219-239.
63.
Lytle, J. (1996). The inquiring manager. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(10), 664-666.
64.
Madrid, G. (1997). Toward understanding the student integration experience of nine Native American and the nine Hispanic women in a community college: A qualitative study. Unpub-lished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
65.
Martinez, R. (1996). Self and administrative designee perceptions of leadership orientations of elementary principals who have and have not completed the California School Leadership Academy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of La Verne, CA.
66.
Meier, D. (1995). The power of their ideas: Lessons from a small school in Harlem. Boston: Beacon.
67.
Meyer, J. , & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 341-363.
68.
Miller, J. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
69.
Moll, L. , & Greenberg, J. B. (1990). Creating zones of possibilities: Combining social contexts for instruction. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 102-131). New York: Cambridge University Press.
70.
Moller, J. (1998). Action research with principals: Gain, strain and dilemmas. Educational Action Research, 6(1), 69-91.
71.
Montgomery, J. (1997). Using action research to address the underachievement of middle school students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
72.
Moore, A. (1997). African-American teachers’ decisions to refer: An exploration of the influenceguiding special education student referrals by African-American early childhood teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas.
73.
Navarro, M. A. (1997). Lenguaje, ideologia y administracion educativa: El discurso modernizador de la Universidad de Guadalajara [Language, ideology and educational administration: The modernizing discourse of the University of Guadalajara]. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
74.
Newman J. (1999). Validity and action research: An online conversation. In I. Hughes (Ed.), Action research electronic reader [Online]. Available at www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/reader
75.
Nicholas, M. (1996). Towards a better understanding of changing gender dynamics in a mixed ability classroom. In P. Lomax (Ed.), Quality management in education: Sustaining the vision through action research (pp. 97-108). London: Routledge.
76.
Ogawa, R. , & Malen, B. (1991). Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method. Review of Educational Research, 61(3), 265-286.
77.
Osterman, K. , & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective practice for educators: Improving schooling through professional development. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press.
78.
Pignatelli, F. (1994, November). Researcher as truth teller: Prospective administrators doing ethnographic research in their workplace. Paper presented at the American Educational Studies Association meeting, Chapel Hill, NC.
79.
Pignatelli, F. , & Levine, L. (1998). Imagining change through the voices of teacher and students: An ethnographic approach. In R. Muth & M. Martin(Eds.), Toward the year 2000: Leader-ship for quality schools: The sixth yearbook of the NCPEA (pp. 240-256). Memphis, TN: NCPEA.
80.
Preedy, M. , & Riches, C. (1988). Practitioner research in school management: An analysis of research studies undertaken for an Open University course. In J. Nias & S. Groundwater-Smith(Eds.), The enquiring teacher: Supporting and sustaining teacher research (pp. 216-230). London: Falmer.
81.
Reed-Danahay, D. (Ed.). (1997). Auto/ethnography: Rewriting the self and the social. New York: Berg.
82.
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-10.
83.
Riehl, C. , Larson, C. L., Short, P. M., & Reitzug, U. C. (2000). Reconceptualizing research and scholarship in educational administration: Learning to know, knowing to do, doing to learn. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 392-428.
84.
Robinson, V. (1993). Problem-based methodology: Research for the improvement of practice. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
85.
Saavedra, E. (1996). Teacher study groups: Contexts for transformative learning and action. Theory into Practice, 35(4), 271-277.
86.
Schein, E. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
87.
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic.
88.
Sena, G. (1996). A study of a school district’s efforts to produce lasting systemic change by impacting leadership roles. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of New Mexico.
89.
Simons, H. (1984). Ethical principles in school self-evaluation. In J. Bell, T. Bush, A. Fox, J. Goodey, & S. Goulding (Eds.), Conducting small-scale investigations in educational management (pp. 46-57). London: Harper & Row.
90.
Sirotnik, K. (1988). The meaning and conduct of inquiry in school-university partnerships. In K. Sirotnik & J. Goodlad (Eds.), School-university partnerships in action (pp. 81-98). New York: Teachers College Press.
91.
Smith Maddox, R. (1999). An inquiry-based reform effort: Creating the conditions for reculturing and restructuring schools. Urban Review, 31(3), 283-304.
92.
Soffer, E. (1995). The principal as action researcher: A study of disciplinary practice. In S. Noffke & R. Stevenson (Eds.), Educational action research: Becoming practically criti-cal (pp. 115-126). New York: Teachers College Press.
93.
Somekh, B. , & Thaler, M. (1997). Contradictions of management theory, organizational culturesand the self. Educational Action Research, 5(1), 141-160.
94.
Stake, R. (1986). An evolutionary view of educational improvement. In E. R. House (Ed.), New directions in educational evaluation (pp. 89-102). London: Falmer.
95.
Steinberg, S. , & Kincheloe, J. (1998). Students as researchers: Creating classrooms that matter. London: Falmer.
96.
Tichy, K. (1994). Perceptions of faculty members in selected catholic high schools regarding North Central Association Evaluation formats. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Louis University, MO.
97.
Tripp, D. (1990). Socially critical action research. Theory into Practice, 24(3), 158-166.
98.
Tripp, D. (1994). Critical incidents in teaching: Developing professional judgement. London: Routledge.
99.
Vail, K. (1996). Data-driven decisions. Executive Educator, 18(4), 28-30.
100.
Wadsworth, M. (1997). A proposal for a service-learning program at Mount St. Mary’s College. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
101.
Wagner, J. (1990). Administrators as ethnographers: School as a context for inquiry and action. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 21(3), 195-221.
102.
Warner, F. (1992). An action research study of educators engaged in learning model II in a participatively managed school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.
103.
Webb, G. (1996). Becoming critical of action research for development. In O. Zuber-Skerritt (Ed.), New directions in action research (pp. 137-161). London: Falmer.
104.
Weiss, C. (1991). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. In D. Anderson & B. Biddle (Eds.), Knowledge for policy: Improving education through research (pp. 173-182). London: Falmer.
105.
Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind “How do I improve my practice?”Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 42-59.
106.
Whitehead, J. , & Lomax, P. (1987). Action research and the politics of educational knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 175-190.
107.
Winter, R. (1991). Interviewers, interviewees, and the exercise of power (fictional-critical writing as a method for educational research). British Educational Research Journal, 17(2), 252-262.
108.
Winter, R. (1997). Action research, universities, and “theory”. Paper presented at the annual Collaborative Action Research Network Conference, East Anglia, UK.
109.
Zeichner, K. , & Noffke, S. (2000). Practitioner research. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (4th ed., pp. 404-442).Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
