In this article, the authors explore common and emerging conceptions of what consti-tutes knowledge in educational administration, how knowledge relates to practice, and how individuals in universities and schools can engage in a particular kind of knowledge work—research. The authors suggest that a fully articulated perspective on research in educational administration might characterize research as occupying a multidimen-sional space delineated along three dimensions: why the research is done, who conducts the research, and how the research is done. Productive, interesting, and generative research can be situated anywhere on these dimensions, and five principles can be used to guide various forms of research. The implication is that although currently the field of educational administration encompasses two communities of practice, we should strive toward becoming one community of scholars. The authors discuss how doctoral pro -grams might develop students for this community of scholars and provide a case example from one university.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, G. L. , & Herr, K. (1999). The new paradigm wars: Is there room for rigorous practitioner knowledge in schools and universities?Educational Researcher, 28(5), 12-21.
2.
Anderson, G. L. , & Jones, F. (2000). Knowledge generation in educational administration from the inside out: The promise and perils of site-based, administrator research. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(3), 428-464.
3.
Argyris, C. (1993). On organizational learning. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
4.
Argyris, C. , Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science: Concepts, methods, and skills for research and intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Argyris, C. , & Schön, D. A. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Argyris, C. , & Schön, D. A. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
Barone, T. E. (1992). A narrative of enhanced professionalism: Educational researchers and popular storybooks about schoolpeople. Educational Researcher, 21(8), 15-24.
8.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
9.
Brown, A. L. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23(8), 4-12.
10.
Brown, J. S. , Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
11.
Burdell, P. , & Swadener, B. B. (1999). Critical personal narrative and autoethnography in education: Reflections on a genre. Educational Researcher, 28(6), 21-26.
12.
Callahan, R. E. (1962). Education and the cult of efficiency: A study of the social forces that have shaped the administration of the public schools. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13.
Campbell, R. F. , Fleming, T., Newell, L. J., & Bennion, J. W. (1987). A history of thought and practice in educational administration. New York: Teachers College Press.
14.
Clandinin, D. J. (1986). Classroom practice: Teacher images in action. London: Falmer.
15.
Clandinin, J. , & Connelly, M. (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Clemens, E. S. (1999). From society to school and back again: Questions about learning in and for a world of complex organizations. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 105-120). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
17.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
18.
Cochran-Smith, M. , & Lytle, S. L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15-25.
19.
Cooper, J. , & Heck, R. (1995). Using narrative in the study of school administration. Qualitative Studies in Education, 8(2), 195-210.
20.
Coulter, D. (1999). The epic and the novel: Dialogism and teacher research. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 4-13.
21.
Culbertson, J. A. (1988). A century’s quest for a knowledge base. In N. J. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 3-26). New York: Longman.
22.
Dillard, C. (1995). Leading with her life: An African American feminist (re)interpretation of leadership for an urban high school principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 31(4), 539-563.
23.
Donmoyer, R. (1999). The continuing quest for a knowledge base: 1976-1998. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administration (2nd ed., pp. 23-44). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Doolittle, G. , Nablo, S., & Carbone, T. A. (1998). The big house. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 380-396.
25.
Duke, N. K. , & Beck, S. W. (1999). Education should consider alternative formats for the dissertation. Educational Researcher, 28(3), 31-36.
26.
Eisner, E. W. (1992). Are all causal claims positivistic? A reply to Francis Schrag. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 8-9.
27.
Eisner, E. W. (1993). Forms of understanding and the future of educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(7), 5-11.
28.
Elbaz, F. L. (1983). Teacher thinking: A study of practical knowledge. London: Croom Helm.
29.
Erickson, F. (1992). Why the clinical trial doesn’t work as a metaphor for educational research. A reply to Francis Schrag. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 9-11.
30.
Evers, C. W. , & Lakomski, G. (1991). Knowing educational administration: Contemporary methodological controversies in educational administration research. New York: Pergamon.
31.
Fenstermacher, G. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research on teaching (Vol. 20, pp. 3-56). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
32.
Foster, W. (1986). Paradigms and promises: New approaches to educational administration. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
33.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
34.
Glaser, B. G. , & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualita-tive research. Chicago: Aldine.
35.
Greene, M. (1994). Epistemology and educational research: The influence of recent approaches to knowledge. In L. Darling-Hammond (Ed.), Review of research in education, Vol. 20 (pp. 423-464). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
36.
Greenfield, T. B. (1984). Leaders and schools: Willfulness and nonnatural order in organiza-tions. In T. J. Sergiovanni & J. E. Corbally (Eds.), Leadership and organizational culture (pp. 142-169). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
37.
Greenfield, T. B. , & Ribbins, P.(Eds.). (1993). Greenfield on educational administration: Towards a humane science. New York: Routledge.
38.
Grimmett, P. P. , & MacKinnon, A. M. (1992). Craft knowledge and the education of teachers. In G. Grant (Ed.), Review of research in education (Vol. 18, pp. 385-456). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
39.
Gronn, P. , & Ribbins, P. (1996). Leaders in context: Postpositivist approaches to understanding educational leadership. Educational Administration Quarterly, 32(3), 452-473.
40.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
Hargreaves, A. (1996). Transforming knowledge: Blurring the boundaries between research, policy, and practice. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 18(2), 105-122.
42.
Heck, R. H. , & Hallinger, P. (1999). Next generation methods for the study of leadership and school improvement. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis(Eds.), Handbook of research on educa-tional administration (2nd ed., pp. 141-162). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
43.
Jackson, P. W. (1990). The functions of educational research. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 3-9.
44.
Kennedy, M. M. (1997). The connection between research and practice. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 4-12.
45.
Kliebard, H. M. (1993). What is a knowledge base, and who would use it if we had one?Review of Educational Research, 63(3), 295-303.
46.
Kozol, J. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Crown.
47.
LaMagdeleine, D. R. , & Kramer, B. H. (1998). Transgression and forgiveness in an international school: A nonmodern case study. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 427-455.
48.
Lather, P. (1986). Issues of validity in openly ideological research: Between a rock and a hard place. Interchange, 17, 63-84.
49.
Lave, J. , & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper.
51.
Lincoln, Y. S. , & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
52.
National Research Council . (1999). Improving student learning: A strategic plan for education research and its utilization. Washington, DC: National Academy.
53.
Ogawa, R. T. , Crowson, R. L., & Goldring, E. B. (1999). Enduring dilemmas of school organiza-tions. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis(Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administra-tion (2nd ed., pp. 277-295). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
54.
Pea, R. D. (1999). New media communications forums for improving education research and practice. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman(Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 336-370). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
55.
Peterson, P. L. (1998). Why do educational research? Rethinking our roles and identities, our texts and contexts. Educational Researcher, 27(3), 4-10.
56.
Putnam, R. T. , & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning?Educational Researcher, 29(1), 4-15.
57.
Rhine, S. (1998). The role of research and teachers’ knowledge base in professional develop-ment. Educational Researcher, 27(5), 27-31.
58.
Richardson, V. (1990). Significant and worthwhile change in teaching practice. Educational Researcher, 19(7), 10-18.
59.
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting research on practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5-10.
60.
Robinson, V.M.J. (1998). Methodology and the research-practice gap. Educational Researcher, 27(1), 17-26.
61.
Rose, M. (1989). Lives on the boundary. New York: Penguin.
62.
Rose, M. (1995). Possible lives: The promise of public education in America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
63.
Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
64.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999a). The core, the canon, and the development of research skills: Issues in the preparation of educational researchers. In E. C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulman (Eds.), Issues in educational research: Problems and possibilities (pp. 166-202). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1999b). Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 4-14.
66.
Schön, D. (1982). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic.
67.
Schrag, F. (1992). In defense of positivist research paradigms. Educational Researcher, 21(5), 5-8.
68.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.
69.
Sergiovanni, T. J. (1994). Building community in schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
70.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(7), 4-14.
71.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technical innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings.
72.
Thomas, G. (1997). What’s the use of theory?Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 75-104.
73.
Wagner, J. (1997). The unavoidable intervention of educational research: A framework for reconsidering researcher-practitioner cooperation. Educational Researcher, 26(7), 13-22.
74.
Wagner, J. (1999). The pragmatics of practitioner research: Linking new knowledge with power in an urban elementary school. Elementary School Journal, 100(2), 151-180.
75.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
76.
Willower, D. J. , & Forsyth, P. B. (1999). A brief history of scholarship on educational adminis-tration. In J. Murphy & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational administra-tion (2nd ed., pp. 1-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
