Colo. Rev. Stat. Ann., 22-30.5-109(3) (West 1998).
4.
Council of Organizations and Others for Education about Parochiaid v. Engler, 566 N.W.2d 208 (Mich. 1997).
5.
Haft, W.
(1998). Charter schools and the nineteenth century corporation: A match made in the public interest. Arizona State Law Journal, 30, 1023-1089.
6.
Heubert, J. P.
(1997). Charter schools, federal disability law, and the paradoxes of deregulation. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 32, 301-353.
7.
Huffman, K. S.
(1998). New YorkUniversity Law Review, 73, 1290-1328.
8.
In re Charter Sch. Application of Englewood on the Palisades Charter Sch., 727 A.2d. N. J. Super. Ct. App. Div. 1999).
9.
Lemon v. Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).
10.
Massachusetts General Laws, ch. 71, 89, 89(i) (West 1996).
11.
Minnesota Stat. 120.064, sub. 8, 21(b), 22 (West 1998).
12.
Nathan, J.
(1996). Charter schools: Creating hope and opportunity for American education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
13.
Porta v. Klagholz, 19 F. Supp. 2d (D.N.J. 1998)
14.
Rofes, E.
(1998). How are school districts responding to charter laws and charter schools?Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley Policy Analysis for California Education.
15.
Schnaiberg, L.
(1999, June 23). Okla., Ore. bump up charter law states to 36. Education Week, pp. 20, 23.
16.
Shelby Sch. v. Arizona State Bd. of Educ., 962 P.2d 230 (Ariz. App. Ct. 1998).
17.
Stark v. Independent Sch. Dist. No. 640, 123 F.3d 1968 (8th Cir. 1997)
18.
United States Department of Education
(1997). A study of charter schools: First-year report. [On-line] Available: http://www.ed.gov/pubs/charter/
19.
Villanueva v. Carere, 85 F.3d 481 (10th Cir. 1996).
20.
Wall. J. Y.
(1998).The establishment of charter schools: A guide to legal issues for legislatures. 1 998 Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal, 69-102.