American Association of University Women.
(1992). How schools short-change girls. Washington, DC: Author.
2.
Apple, M. W.
(1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.
3.
Brown, F.
(1995). Privatization in public education: Theories and concepts. Education and Urban Society, 27, 114-126.
4.
Brown, F.
(1997). Privatization and urban education: More political and less educational. Education and Urban Society, 29, 203-216.
5.
Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
6.
Coles, A. D.
(1998, May 20). Middle school keeps boys and girls apart to enforce discipline, Education Week, p. 7.
7.
Coons, J. E.
, & Sugarman, S. D. (Eds.) (1978). Education by choice: The case for family control. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8.
Crozier, M.
(1984). The trouble with America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9.
Equal Educational Opportunity Act of 1974,20 U.S.C. 1701 et seq. (1974).
10.
Garrett v. Board of Educ. of the School District of the City of Detroit, 775 F. Supp. 1004 (E.D. Mich. 1991).
11.
Hopkins, R.
(1997). Educating Black males: Critical lessons in schooling, community, and power. Albany: State University of New York Press.
12.
Jones v. Board of Educ. of the City of New York, 632 F. Supp. 1319 (E.D.N.Y. 1986).
13.
Kaminer, W.
(1998). The trouble with single-sex schools. The Atlantic Monthly, 281(4), 22-26, 34.
14.
Lee, V. E.
(1997). Gender equity and the organization of schools. In B. J. Bank & P. M. Hal (Eds.), Gender, equity and schooling: Policy and practice (pp. 135-158). New York: Garland.
15.
Lee, V. E.
, & Bryk, A. S. (1986). Effects of single-sex secondary schools on student achievement and attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(5), 381-395.
16.
Lewin, T.
(1998, March 12). All-girl schools questioned as a way to attain equity: Study finds no proof programs are better. New York Times, p. A12.
17.
Marsh, H. W.
(1989). Effects of attending single-sex and coeducational high schools on achievement, attitudes, behaviors, and sex differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 70-85.
18.
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan, 458 U.S. 718 (1982).
19.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
Orfield, G.
(1993). The growth of segregation in American schools: Changing patterns of separation and poverty since 1968. Alexandria, VA: National School Boards Association.
21.
Peterson, P. E.
, & Hassel, B. C. (Eds.). (1998). Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
22.
Russo, C. J.
, & Mawdsley, R. D. (1997). VMI and single-sex public schools: End of an era? Education Law Reporter, 114(4), 999-1010.
23.
Shmurak, C. B.
(1998). Voices of hope: Adolescent girls at single-sex and coeducational schools. New York: Peter Lang.
24.
Spence, G.
(1995). From freeman to slavery: The rebirth of tyranny in America. New York: St. Martin's Griffin.
25.
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, 20 U.S.C. 1681 (1998).
26.
Tucker, J.
(1998a, February 15). As public schools go same-sex only, many private schools go co-ed. Oakland Tribune, p. 13.
27.
Tucker,J.
(1998b, February 15). Separation of boys, girls stirs debate: Public schools react coolly to program. The Oakland Tribune, pp. 1-13.
28.
Tyack, D. B.
, & Hansot, E. (1992). Learning together: A history of coeducation in American public schools. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
29.
United States v. Hinds County Sch. Bd., 560 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1977).
30.
United States v. Virginia, 116 S. Ct. 2264 (1996).
31.
Vorchheimer v. School Dist. of Philadelphia, 532 F.2d 880 (3rd Cir. 1976).
32.
Witte, J. F.
, & Clune. W. H. (Eds.). (1990). Choice and control in American education. London: Falmer.