Allington, R. L.
, & McGill-Franzer, A. (1989). School response to reaching failure: Instruction for Chapter I and special education students in grades two, four and eight. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 529-542.
2.
Berger, J.
(1991, April 30). Costly special classes serve many with minimal needs. New York 7imes, pp. Al, 12.
3.
California Education Connection.
(1990). Every study succeeds: A California initiative to ensure success for students at risk. Sacramento: California Department of Education.
4.
Commission on Chapter I.
(1992). Making schools work for children in poverty. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
5.
Cronbach, L. J.
, & Snow, R. E. (1977). Aptitudes and instructional methods. New York: Wiley.
6.
Dwyer, K. P.
(1994). NASP proposes amendments to special education law. Communique, 23(1), 8-10. (Published by the National Association of School Psychologists, Silver Springs, Maryland)
7.
Felix, N.
, Hertlein, F., McKenna, D., & Raybom, R. (1987). Combining categorical program services can make a major difference. Phi Delta Kappan, 68(10), 787-788.
8.
Gerber, M. M.
, & Semmel, M. I. (1984). Teacher as imperfect test: Reconceptualizing the referral process. Educational Psychologist, 19, 137-148.
9.
Graden, J. L.
, Zims, J. E., & Curtis, M. J. (Eds.). (1988). Alternative educational delivery systems: Enhancing instructional options for all students. Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists.
10.
Haynes, M. C., & Jenkins, J. R. (Eds.). (1986). Reading instruction in special education resource rooms. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 161-190.
11.
Heller, L.
, Holtzman, W., & Messick, S. (Eds.). (1982). Placing children in special education: A strategy for equity. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
12.
Larry P. v. Riles, Civil Action N.C.-71-2270, 343 F. Supp. 1036 (N.D. Cal. 1972).
13.
Moore, M.
, Strang, E., Schwartz, M., & Braddock, M. (1988). Patterns in special education delivery and cost. Washington, DC: Decisions Resources Corporation.
14.
National Association of School Psychologists/National Coalition of Advocates for Students.
(1985). Advocacy for the appropriate educational services for all children: A position statement. Silver Spring, MD: Adopted by the Executive Board/Delegate Assembly of the National Association of School Psychologists.
15.
Reynolds, M. C.
(1991). Classification and labeling. In J. Lloyd, N. Singh, & A. Repp (Eds.), The regular education initiative: Alternative perspectives on concepts, issues, and models (pp. 29-41). Sycamore, IL: Sycamore Publishing.
16.
Reynolds, M. C.
, & Wang, M. C. (1983, January). Restructuring "special" school programs: A position paper [Special issue 1]. Policy Studies Review, 2, 189-212.
17.
Rueda, R.
(1989). Defining mild disabilities with language-minority students. Exceptional Children, 56(2), 121-128.
18.
U.S. Department of Education
. (1994). 16th annual report to Congress on the implementation of the Individual with Disabilities Education Act. Washington, DC: Office of Special Education Programs.
19.
Wang, M. C.
, Reynolds, M. C., & Walberg, H. (1988). Integrating the children of the second system. Phi Delta Kappan, 70(3), 248-251.
20.
Wong, K. K.
, & Wang, M. C. (Eds.). (1994). Rethinking policy for at-risk students. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan (for the National Society for the Study of Education Series on Contemporary Educational Issues).
21.
Zigler, E. F
, & Lang, M. L. (1991). Child-care choices: Balancing the needs of children, families, and society. New York: Free Press.
