Beales, J. R.
, & O'Leary, J. (1992). Making schools work: Contracting options for better management. Policy Study, 169, 1-40.
2.
Boyd, W. L.
(1990). The national level: Reagan and the bully pulpit. In N. Bacharach (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 42-51). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Brown, F.
(1991). Introduction: School choice and the politics of decline. Education and Urban Society, 23, 115-118.
4.
Butler, S. M.
(1985). Introduction. In S. M. Butler (Ed.), The privatization option: A strategy to shrink the size of government (pp. vii-viii). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
5.
Clarkson, K. W.
(1989). Privatization at the state and local level. In P. W. MacAvoy, W. T. Stanbury, G. Yarrow, & R. J. Zeckhauser (Eds.), Privatization and state-owned enterprises (pp. 143-194). Boston: Kluwer Academic.
6.
Cuban, L.
(1988). The managerial imperative and the practice of leadership in schools. New York: State University of New York Press.
7.
Gormley, W. T.
(1991). Privatization and its alternatives. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
8.
Hanke, S. H.
(1985). The theory of privatization. In S. M. Butler (Ed.), The privatization option: A strategy to shrink the size of government (pp. 1-14). Washington, DC: Heritage Foundation.
9.
Hodgkinson, H.
(1991). Reform versus reality. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(1), 9-16.
10.
Honig, B.
(1990). The view from California: The key to reform; sustaining and expanding upon initial success. In N. Bacharach (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 52-66). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
11.
Kent, C.
(1987). Privatization of public functions: Promises and problems. In C. Kent (Ed.), Entrepreneurship and the privatizing of government (pp. 1-21). New York: Quorum Books.
12.
Kolderie, T.
(1986, July/August). Two different concepts of privatization. Public Policy Review, pp. 286-290.
13.
Kozol, J.
(1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York: Crown.
14.
Lazarewicz, R. S.
(1994). A district takes initiative to operate own program. School Administrator, 51(5), 35-38.
15.
Letwin, 0.
(1986). Privatizing the world: A study of international privatisation in theory and practice. London: International Privatisation Unit, N. M. Rothschild & Sons.
16.
Levine, G. F.
(1991). Meeting the third wave: Legislative approaches to recent judicial school finance ruling. Harvard Journal on Legislation, 28(2), 293-638.
17.
Lieberman, M.
(1989). Privatization and educational choice. New York: St. Martin.
18.
McKenzie, F. D.
(1991). Attracting the best: It's a seller's market for urban superintendents these days-Here's what a school board should do to lure top candidates. American School Board Journal, 178, 25-26.
19.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983). Nation at risk. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
Odden, A. R.
, & Picus, L. 0. (1992). School finance: A policy perspective. New York: McGraw-Hill.
21.
Odden, A. R.
, Picus, L. O., & Kim, L. (1992). General Background of California. In S. Gold, D. Smith, S. Lawton, & A. Hyary (Eds.), Public school finance programs of the United States and Canada 1990-91 (Vol. 1). Albany: Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, Center for the Study of the States.
22.
Pack, J. R.
(1991). The opportunities and constraints of privatization. In W. T. Gormley (Ed.), Privatization and its alternatives (pp. 281-306). Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
23.
Passow, H. A.
(1990). How it happened, wave by wave: Whither (or wither?) school reform? In N. Bacharach (Ed.), Education reform: Making sense of it all (pp. 52-66). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
24.
Riegel, R. B.
(1994). Twenty years of successful private management. School Administrator, 51(5), 34-38.
25.
Ross, R. L.
(1987). Government and the private sector: Who would do what?New York: Crane Russak.
26.
Savas, E. S.
(1985). The efficiency of the private sector. In S. M. Butler (Ed.), The privatization option: A strategy to shrink the size of government (pp. 15-31). Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
27.
Valente, C. F.
, & Manchester, L. D. (1984). Rethinking local services: Examining alternative delivery approaches. Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
