Campione, J. C.
(1989). Assisted assessment: A taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22(3), 151-165.
2.
Cummins, J.
(1981). The role of primary language development in promoting educational success for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework(pp. 3-49). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
3.
Cummins, J.
(1989). Empowering minority students. Sacramento: California Association of Bilingual Education.
4.
Gallimore, R.
, & Tharp, R. (1990). Teaching mind in society: Teaching, schooling and literate discourse. In L. C. Moli (Ed.), Vygotsky and education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychology (pp. 175-205). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5.
Gifford, B. R.
(1992). Introduction. In B. R. Gifford & M. C. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessments: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction (pp. 1-4). Boston, MA: Kluwer.
6.
Goodman, K.
(1986). What's whole in whole language?Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
7.
Goodnan, Y M.
, & Goodman, K. S. (1990). Vygotsky in a whole-language perspective. In L. C. Moli (Ed.), Vygotsky and education: Instructional implications and applications of socio-historical psychology (223-250). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Heshusius, L.
(1989). The Newtonian mechanistic paradigm, special education, and contours of alternatives: An overview. Journal of Learning Disabilities,22(7), 403-415.
9.
Krashen, S. D.
(1981). Bilingual education and second language acquisition theory in California State Department of Education (ed.). Schooling and Language Minority Students: A Theoretical Framework (pp. 51-79). Los Angeles: Evahaion Dissemination and Assessment Center.
10.
Krashen, S. D.
(1985). Inquiries and Insights. Hayward, CA: Allemany Press.
11.
Linn, R. L.
, Baker, E. L., & Dunbar, S. (1991). Complex, performance-based assessment: Expectations and validation criteria. Educational Researcher,20(8), 15-21.
12.
Los Angeles County Office of Education
. (1991). The condition of public education in LA. County, 1990-91. Los Angeles: Author.
13.
Mercado, C.
, & Romero, M. (1993). Assessment of students in bilingual education. In M. B. Arias & U. Casanova (Eds.), Bilingual education: Politics, practice, research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14.
Oller, J. W., Jr.
(1979). Language tests at school. New York: Longman.
15.
Poplin, M.
(1988a). The reductionistic fallacy in learning disabilities: Replicating the past by reducing the present. Journal of Learning Disabilities,21(7), 389-400.
16.
Poplin, M.
(1988b). Holistic/constructivist principles of the teaching/learning process: Implications for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 21(7), 401-416.
17.
Ramnrez, J. D.
(1992). Executive summary. Bilingual Research Journal, 16(1-2), 1-62.
18.
Smith, F.
(1986). Insult to intelligence: The bureaucratic invasion of our classrooms. Ports-mouth, NH: Heinemann.
19.
Stanovich, K. E.
(1991). Discrepancy definitions of reading disability: Has intelligence led us astray? Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1), 7-29.
20.
Thonis, E. W.
(1981). Reading instruction for language minority students. In California State Department of Education (Ed.), Schooling and language minority students: A theoretical framework (pp. 145-181). Los Angeles: Evaluation, Dissemination, and Assessment Center.
21.
Vygotsky, L.
(1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22.
Willig, A. C.
(1985). A meta-analysis of selected studies on the effectiveness of bilingual education. Review of Educational Research, 55(3), 269-317.
