Bennett, A. L.
, Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., Kerbow, D., Luppescu, S., & Sebring, P. A. (1992). Charting reform: The principals' perspective. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
2.
Carnegie Forum.
(1986). A nation prepared: Teachers for the 2lst century. New York: Camegie Forum on Education and the Economy.
3.
Chicago Teachers Union.
(1986). Perspectives from the classroom-II. Chicago: Author.
4.
Coleman, J. S.
, Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. M., Weinfeld, F. D., & York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office.
5.
Easton, J. Q.
(1989). Teacher attitudes toward school reformChicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.
6.
Easton, J. Q.
, & Storey, S. L. (1994). The development of local school councils. Education and Urban Society, 26(3), 220-237.
7.
Easton, J. Q.
, Bryk, A. S., Driscoll, M. E., Kotsakis, J. G., Sebring, P. A., & van der Ploeg, A. J. (1991). Charting reform: The teachers' turn. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research.
8.
Easton, J. Q.
, Flinspach, S. L., Ford, D. J., Qualls, J., Ryan, S. P., & Storey, S. L. (1991). Decision making and school improvement: LSCs in the first two years of reform. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.
9.
Easton, J. Q.
, Flinspach, S. L., O'Connor, C., Paul, M., Quails, J., & Ryan, S. P. (1993). Local school council governance: The third year of Chicago school reformChicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.
10.
Etheridge, C. P.
, & Colins, T. W. (1992). Conflict in restructuring the principal teacher relationship in Memphis. In G. A. Hess, Jr. (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists (pp. 89-102). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
11.
Flinspach, S. L
, &Ryan, S.P. (1992). Vision and accountability in school improvement planning. Chicago: Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance.
12.
Flinspach, S. L
, & Ryan, S. P. (1994). Diversity of outcomes: Case studies of local schools under school reform. Education and Urban Society, 26(3), 292-305.
13.
Hanson, M. K.
, Morris, D. R., & Coffins, R. A. (1992). Empowerment of teachers in Dade County's school-based management pilot. In G. A. Hess, Jr. (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists (pp. 71-87). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
14.
Hess, G. A., Jr.
(1991). School restructuring, Chicago style. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin.
15.
Louis, K. S.
, & Miles, M. E. (1990). Improving the urban high school: What works and why. New York: Teachers College Press.
16.
Muncey, D. E.
, & McQuilian, P. J. (1992). The dangers of assuming a consensus for change: Some examples from the Coalition of Essential Schools. In G. A. Hess, Jr. (Ed.), Empowering teachers and parents: School restructuring through the eyes of anthropologists (pp. 47-69). Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
17.
Orfield, G.
(1984). The Chicago study of access and choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Public Policy Committee.
18.
Rosenkranz, T.
(1994). Reallocating resources: Discretionary funds provide engine for change. Education and Urban Society, 26(3), 264-284.
19.
Ryan, W.
(1976). Blaming the victimNew York: Random House.
20.
Wallace, R. C., Jr.
(1986). Data-driven educational leadership. Evaluation Practice, 7(3), 5-15.