Ball, D. L.
(1992). Implementing the NCTM standards: Hopes and hurdles. (Issue Paper 92-2). East Lansing, MI: The National Center for Research on Teacher Learning.
2.
Carlson, C. G.
(1992). The metamorphosis of mathematics education. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3.
Harp, L.
(1993a, September 15). Groups fighting outcomes plan in Washington at odds. Education Week, 13(2), 22.
4.
Harp, L.
(1993b, September 22). Pennsylvania parent becomes mother of "outcomes" revolt. Education Week, 13(3), 1.
5.
Fuhrman, S.
(1993). The politics of coherence. in S. H. Fuhrman (Ed.), Designing coherent education policy: Improving the system (pp. 1-34). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Fuhrman, S.
, Massell, D., & Associates. (1992). Issues and strategies in systemic reform. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
7.
Kelley, C.
(1994). Determining curricula and exam content in the college board's advanced placement program: Implications for national standards, Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 172-184.
8.
Koretz, D. M.
, Madaus, G., Haertel, E., & Beaton, A. (1992). National educational standards and testing: A response to the recommendations of the national council on educational standards and testing. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
9.
Marsh, D. D.
, & Odden, A. R. (1991). Implementation of the California mathematics and science curriculum frameworks. In A. R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 219-240). Albany: State University of New York Press.
10.
Massell, D.
, & Fuhrman, S. (1993, November). Ten years of state education reform: Update with four case studies. New Brunswick, NJ: Consortium for Policy Research in Education.
11.
Massell, D.
(1994). Setting standards in mathematics and social studies. Education and Urban Society, 29(2), 118-140.
12.
McLaughlin, M. W.
(1991). The RAND change agent study: Ten years later. In A. R. Odden (Ed.), Education policy implementation (pp. 143-155). Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
Myers, M.
(1994). Problems and issues facing the national standards project in English. Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 141-157.
14.
National Education Goals Panel.
(1991). Building a nation of learners. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
15.
Pence, P.
, & Petrosky, A. (1992, April). Defining performance standards and developing an assessment for accomplished English language arts teaching of young adolescents. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, San Francisco.
16.
Romberg, T. A.
(1992, February). NCTM's standards: A rallying flag for mathematics teachers. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 36.
17.
Smith, M.
, & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 223-267). New York: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
18.
Sykes, G.
, & Plastrik, P. (1992). Standard-setting as educational reform. A paper prepared for the National Council on Accreditation of Teacher Education, Washington, DC.
19.
Yee, G.
, & Kirst, M. (1994). Lessons from the new science curriculum of the 1950s and 1960s. Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 158-171.
