Asante, M. K.
(1991). Multiculturalism: An exchange. The American Scholar, (60)2, 267-272.
2.
Ball, D. L.
(1992, summer). Magical hopes: Manipulatives and the reform of math education. American Educator, pp. 14-47.
3.
Berenson, E.
(1992). Getting the story straight. Phi Delta Kappan, (74)2, 160.
4.
Bishop, A. J.
(1990). Mathematical power to the people. Harvard Educational Review, 60(3), 357-369.
5.
Bruner, J.
(1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.
6.
California Department of Education.
(1988). History-social science framework for California public schools: Kindergarten through grade twelve. Sacramento, CA: Author.
7.
Carlson, C. G.
(1992). The metamorphosis of mathematics education. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
8.
Camine, D.
(1992). Expanding the notion of teachers' rights: Access to tools that work [Monograph No. 7]. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25(1-2).
9.
Conference Board of Mathematical Sciences.
(1975). Overview and analysis of school mathematics, grades K-12. Washington, DC: Author.
10.
Davis, R. B.
(1984). Learning mathematics: The cognitive science approach to mathematics education. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
11.
Ellis, W. F.
, & Epstein, K. K. (1992). Who needs defending-textbook publishers or students? Phi Delta Kappan, 74(2), 163-168.
12.
Elmore, R. F.
(1993). The development and implementation of large-scale curriculum reforms.
13.
Draft paper prepared for the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
14.
Finn, C. E., Jr.
(1993, January 20). What if those math standards are wrong? Education Week, pp. 36, 26.
15.
Hoffmeister, A.
(in press). Elitism and reform in school mathematics. Journal of Remedial and Special Education.
16.
Kirp, D. L.
(1991, February 24). The battle of the books. San Francisco Examiner's Image Magazine, pp. 17-25.
17.
Massell, D.
(in press). Achieving consensus: Setting the agenda for state curriculum reform. In S. Fuhrman & R. Elmore (Eds.), Governing curriculum. Arlington, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
18.
National Center for Research in Mathematical Sciences Education.
(1992). Teacher questionnaire: Summary results. Madison, WI: Author.
19.
National Commission on Excellence in Education.
(1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
20.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
(1980). An agenda for action: Recommendations for school mathematics of the 1980's. Reston, VA: Author.
21.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
(1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
22.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
(1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23.
Patrick, J. J.
(1992). Topics in the social studies curriculum, grades K-12. Social studies curriculum resource handbook: A practical guide for K-12 social studies curriculum. New York: Kraus International Publications.
24.
Pechman, E.
, & Laguarda, K. G. (1993). Status of new state curriculum frameworks, standards, assessments, and monitoring systems. Paper prepared for the U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
25.
Price, H. B.
(1992). Multiculturalism: Myths and realities. Phi Delta Kappan, 74(3), 208-213.
26.
Ravitch, D.
(1990). Multiculturalism: E. pluribus plures. The American Scholar, 59(3), 339, 353.
27.
Reinhold, R.
(1991, September 21). Class struggle. The New York Times Magazine, pp. 26-52.
28.
Romberg, T. A.
(1988). NCTM's curriculum and evaluation standards: What they are and why they are needed. Arithmetic Teacher, (37) 9.
29.
Romberg, T. A.
(1992). NCTM's standards: A rallying flag for mathematics teachers. Educational Leadership, 50(5), 36.
30.
Smith, M.
, & O'Day, J. (1991). Systemic school reform. In S. Fuhrman & B. Malen (Eds.), The politics of curriculum and testing (pp. 233-267). New York: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
31.
Svengalis, C. M.
(1992). National survey of course offerings in social studies, kindergarten-grade 12, 1991-1992. Washington, DC: Council of Social Studies Specialists.
32.
Walker, D.
(1990). Fundamentals of curriculum. Saddlebrook, NJ: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
33.
Waugh, D.
(1991). California's history textbooks: Do they offend? California Journal, 22(3), 121-127.
34.
Yee, G.
& Kirst, M. (1994). Lessons from the new science curriculum of the 1950s and 1960s. Education and Urban Society, 26(2), 158-171.
