American Association for the Advancement of Science
. (1963). Science: A process approachWashington, DC: Gienn and Company.
2.
CHAMPAGNE, A. B.
, & KLOPFER, L E. (1984). Research in science education: The cognitive psychology perspective. In D. Holdzkom & P. B. Lutz (Eds.),Research within reach. Science education (pp. 171-189). Charleston, WV: Research and Development Interpretation Ser- vice, Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
3.
Educational Testing Service
. (1988). The science report card: Trends and achievement based on the 1986 National Assessment (Report. No. 17-S-01). Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress.
4.
HARMS, N. C.
, & YAGER, R. E. (Eds.). (1981). What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 3). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
5.
HICKMAN, F. M.
, PATRICK, J. J., & BYBEE, R. W. (1987). Science/technology/society: A framework for curriculum reform in secondary school science and social studies. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
6.
HUEFTLE, S. J.
, RAKOW, S. J., & WELCH, W. W. (1983). Images of science: A summary of results from the 1981-82 National Assessment in Science. Minneapolis: Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center, The University of Minnesota.
7.
MILLER, J. D.
, SUCHNER, R. W., & VOELKER, A. M. (1980). Citizenship in an age of science: Changing attitudes among young adults. New York: Permagon.
8.
National Assessment of Educational Progress
. (1978). The Third Assessment of Science, 1976-77. Denver, CO: Author.
9.
National Research Council
. (1989). Everybody counts: A report to the nation on the future of mathematics education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
PATRICK, J. J.
, & REMY, R. C. (1985). Connecting science, technology, and society in the education of citizens. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
11.
PEARSON, J. F.
(Ed.). (1988). Science/technology/society: Model lessons for secondary science classes. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
12.
PENICK, J. E.
, & YAGER, R. E. (1982). Students hold varying perceptions of classes, content, and teachers of school science. The Iowa Curriculum Bulletin, 6(2): 43-46.
13.
SINGLETON, L R.
(1988). Science/technology/society: Training manual. Boulder, CO: Social Science Education Consortium.
14.
TORRANCE, P. E.
(1966). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking. Princeton, NJ: Personnel Press.
15.
VOELKER, A. M.
(1982). The development of an attentive public for science: Implications for science teaching. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What research says to the science teacher (Vol. 4) (pp. 65-79). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
16.
YAGER, R. E.
, & YAGER, S. 0. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22(4): 359-364.