DEWEY, J.
(1966) Logic: The Theory of Inquiry. New York: Holt.
2.
EISNER, E.
(1979) The Educational Imagination. New York: Macmillan.
3.
EISNER, E.
(1983) "Anastasia might still be alive, but the monarchy is dead."Educ. Researcher12, 5 (May).
4.
FEYERABEND, P.
(1970) "Against method," in M. Radner and S. Winokur (eds.) Analyses of Theories and Methods of Physics and Psychology. Minneapolis: Univ. of Minnesota Press.
5.
FILSTEAD, W.
(1979) "Qualitative methods: a needed perspective in evaluation research," in T. Cook and C. Reichardt (eds.) Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Evaluation Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6.
GUBA E.
and Y. LINCOLN (1982) Effective Evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
McGONAGALL, W. T.
(1980) Yet Further Poetic Gems. London: Duckworth.
8.
MILES, M.
and A. M. HUBERMAN (1984) "Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data...."Educ. Researcher13, 5 (May).
9.
MILES, M.
and A. M. HUBERMAN (1985) Qualitative Data Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10.
MILL, J. S.
(1950) Philosophy of Scientific Method (E. Nagel, Ed.). New York: Hafner.
11.
PHILLIPS, D. C.
(1987) Philosophy, Science, and Social Inquiry. Oxford: Pergamon.
12.
PILE, S.
(1980) The Book of Heroic Failures. London: Future.
13.
RORTY, R.
(1979) Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press.
14.
SADLER, D. ROYCE
(1982) "Intuitive data processing as a potential source of bias in naturalistic evaluations," in E. House et al., Evaluation Studies Review Annual, Vol. 7. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
