Advisory Panel on the SAT Score Decline. (1977) On Further Examination. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.
2.
APPLEBEE, A. N.
, J. A., LANGER, R. K. DURST, K. BUTLER-NALIN, J. D. MARSHALL, and G. E. NEWELL (1984) Contexts for Learning to Write: Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3.
AMBACH, G. M.
(1984) State and local action for education in New York. Phi Delta Kappan66: 202-204.
4.
BOYER, E. L.
(1983) High school: A Report on Secondary Education in America. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
California State Department of Education
. (1984) Performance Report for California Schools. Sacramento, CA: Author.
6.
CICIRELLI, V. G.et al.
(1969) The Impact of Head Start: An Evaluation of the effects of Head Start on Children's Cognitive and Affective Development. Athens: Ohio University and Westinghouse Learning Corporation.
7.
CURTIS, D.
(1985) "Bay high schools get good marks."San Francisco Chronicle, (October 23): 1,4.
8.
GOODLAD, J. I.
(1983) A Place Called School. New York: McGraw-Hill.
9.
HANFORD, G. H.
(1985) "Yes, the SAT does help colleges."Harvard Educ. Rev.55: 324-331.
10.
KIRST, M. W.
and F. WIRT (1982) Schools in Conflict. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
11.
KLEIN, S. E.
(1982) Testimony to Committee on Labor and Human Resources of the United States Senate in Regard to the 1983 Authorization for the Science Education Component of the National Science Foundation. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 215 908. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
12.
LINN, R. L.
(1983) "Testing and instruction: links and distinctions."J. Educ. Measurement20: 179-189.
13.
McDONNELL, L.
and M. McLAUGHLIN (1982) Education Policy and the Role of the States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
14.
MESSICK, S. M.
(1980) The Effectiveness of Coaching for the SAT: Review and Reanalysis of Research from the Fifties to the FTC. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
15.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983) A Nation at Risk: The Imperative for Educational reform. Stock No. 065-000-00177-2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
16.
PASCHAL, R. A.
, T. WEINSTEIN, and H. J. WALBERG (1984) "The effects of homework on learning: a quantitative synthesis."J. of Educ. Research78: 97-104.
17.
RAVITCH, D.
(1984) "Value of standardized tests in indicating how well students are learning," pp. 59-67 in C. W. Daves (ed.) The Uses and Misuses of Tests. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
18.
SIZER, T. R.
(1984) Horace's Compromise: The Dilemma of the American High School Today. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
19.
WHARTON, Y. L.
(1977) List of Hypotheses Advanced to Explain the SAT Score Decline. New York: College Entrance Examination Board.