BAILEY, S. K.
and E. K. MOSHER (1968) ESEA: The Office of Education Administers a Law. Syracuse: Syracuse Univ. Press.
2.
BARDACH, E.
(1977) The Implementation Game: What Happens After a Bill Becomes a Law. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3.
BARRO, S.
(1981) "The funds distribution mechanism of federal education grant programs. " Prepared for the School Finance Project, U.S. Department of Education.
4.
BERMAN, P.
(1982) "Learning to comply."Peabody J. of Education60, 1 (Fall): 53-65.
5.
BERMAN, P.
and M. W. McLAUGHLIN (1978) Federal Programs Supporting Educational Change, Vol. VII: Factors Affecting Implementation and Continuation. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
6.
ELMORE, R. F.
(1980) Complexity and Control: What Legislators and Administrators Can Do About Implementing Public Policy. Washington, DC: National Institute of Education.
7.
ELMORE, R. F.
and M. W. McLAUGHLIN (1982) "Strategic choice in federal policy: The compliance-assistance tradeoff," pp. 159-194 in A. Lieberman and M. W. McLaughlin (eds.) Policymaking in Education (81 st Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education). Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.
8.
ELMORE, R. F.
and M. W. McLAUGHLIN (1981) "Rethinking the federal role in education. " Prepared for the School Finance Project, U.S. Department of Education.
9.
FARRAR, E.
, J. E. DESANCTIS, and D. K. COHEN (1980) "The lawn party: the evolution of federal programs in local settings."Phi Delta Kappan62, 3 (October): 161-171.
10.
HARGOVE, E. C.
(1982) "Strategies for educational policies: compliance and incentives," pp. 114-128 in J. D. Shermanet al. (eds.) New Dimensions of the Federal-State Partnership in Education. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
11.
HARGOVE, E. C.
(1981) "The search for implementation theory." Presented at the 1980 meeting of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.
12.
HARGOVE, E. C.S. C. GRAHAM
, L. E. WARD, V. ABERNETHY, J. CUNNINGHAM, and W. K. VAUGH (1981) Regulation and Schools: The Implementation of Equal education for Handicapped Children. Nashville: Institute for Public Policy Studies, Vanderbilt University.
13.
HAWLEY, W. D.
(1981) "Considerations for determining the federal role in elementary and secondary education." Prepared for the School Finance Project, U. S. Department of Education.
14.
INGRAM, H.
(1977) "Policy implementation through bargaining."Public Policy25, 4 (Fall).
15.
KIRST, M.
and R. JUNG (1980) "The utility of a longitudinal approach in assessing implementation: a thirteen years view of Title I ESEA."Educ. Evaluation and Policy Analysis2, 5 (September-October): 17-23.
16.
KNAPP, M. S.
, J. L. DAVID, C. R. FINNAN, and M. S. STEARNS (1982) "The cumulative effects of government categorical programs and civil rights mandates on schools and school districts: a review of an emerging policy research literature." Presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association.
17.
KNAPP, M. S.
, M. S. STEARNS, B. J. TURNBULL, J. L. DAVID, and S. M. PETERSON (1983) Cumulative Effects of Federal Education Policies on Schools and Districts. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
18.
KUTNER, M. A.
and J. D. SHERMAN (1982) "An intergovernmental perspective on federal education grants."Peabody J. of Education60. 1 (Fall): 66-81.
19.
MARTIN, R.
and R. McCLURE (1969) Title I of ESEA: Is It Helping Poor Children?Washington, DC: Washington Research Project and the NAACP Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.
20.
McDONNELL, L. M.
and M. W. McLAUGHLIN (1982) Education Policy and the Role of the States. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
21.
McDONNELL, L. M.
and M. W. McLAUGHLIN (1980) Program Consolidation and the State Role in ESEA Title IV. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
22.
MILNE, A. M.
, J. MOSKOWITZ, and F. M. ELLMAN (1982) Serving Special Needs Children: The State Approach. Washington, DC: Decision Resources.
23.
MOORE, M. T.
, M. E. GOERTZ, T. W. HARTLE, H. R. WINSLOW, Jr., J. L. DAVID, J. SJOGREN, B. J. TURNBULL, R. J. COLEY, and R. P. HOLLAND (1983) The Interaction of Federal and Related State Education Programs. Washington, DC: Education Policy Research Institute of the Educational Testing Service.
24.
MURPHY, J. T.
(1973) "The education bureaucracies implement novel policy: the politics of Title I of ESEA, 1965-1972, in A. P. Sindler (ed.) Policy and Politics in America. Boston: Little, Brown.
25.
MURPHY, J. T.
(1971) "Title I of ESEA: the politics of implementing federal education reform."Harvard Educ. Rev.41, 1 (February): 35-63.
26.
National Institute of Education
(1977) Administration of Compensatory Education. Washington, DC: author.
27.
ORLAND, M. E.
and R. J. GOETTEL (1982) "States and the implementation of federal categorical programs in education: a heuristic framework."Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis4, 2 (Summer): 141-155.
28.
Planar Corporation
(1973) The Silken Purse: Legislative Recommendations for Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington DC: author.
29.
PRESSMAN, J. L.
and A. WILDAVSKY (1973) Implementation. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
30.
SEELEY, D. S.
(1982) "Productivity in elementary and secondary education programs," pp. 219-230 in J. D. Shermanet al. (eds.) New Dimensions of the Federal-State Partnership in Education. Washington, DC: Institute for Educational Leadership.
31.
STEARNS. M.S.
, D. GREENE, and J. L. DAVID (1980) Local Implementation of P. L. 94-142: First Year Report of a Longitudinal Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
32.
WEATHERLY, R.
and R. M. LIPSKY (1977) "Street level bureaucrats and institutional innovation: implementing special education reform."Harvard Educ. Rev.47:171-197.
33.
WILLIAMS, W.
(1980) The Implementation Perspective. Berkeley: Univ. of California Press.
34.
WINSLOW, H. R., Jr.
(1979) Trends in Management of ESEA Title I: A Perspective from Compliance Reviews. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
35.
WRIGHT, W. R.
(1980) Local Implementation of P. L 94-142: Second Year Report of a Longitudinal Study. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.