The major claim to legitimacy by a social scientist is the claim that his procedures systematically evaluate the quality of his models, and, thus, that his speculations are good ones.
James G. March (1972)
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbtC. [ed.] (1976) The Evaluation of Social Programs. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
2.
AndersonB.MarkJ. (1976) Attrition, mobility, and productivity among teachers: the case of metropolitan St. Louis. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
3.
AverchH. et al. (1972) How effective is schooling? A critical review and synthesis of research findings. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
4.
BallS. J.BogatzG. A. (1970) The first year of Sesame Street: an evaluation. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
5.
BriggsP. G. (1973) A perspective on change: the administration of Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
6.
Children's Television Workshop (1977) Research bibliography. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
7.
CohenD. K. (1970) Politics and research: evaluation of social action programs in education. Rev. of Educ. Research 40: 213–238.
8.
ConnerR. F. (1977) Selecting a control group: an analysis of the randomization process in twelve social reform programs. Evaluation Q. 1: 195–244.
9.
CookT. D. et al. (1976) Sesame Street Revisited: Continuation in Evaluation Research. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
10.
DattaL. (1976) The impact of the Westinghouse-Ohio evaluation on the development of Project Head Start, pp. 129–182 in AbtC. (ed.) The Evaluation of Social Programs. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
11.
DentlerR. (1969) Urban eyewash: a review of Title I, Year II. Urban Rev. 3: 32 ff.
12.
GoldnerL. (1973) Don't give up on compensatory education: just make it more relevant to individual needs. Urban Education8: 311–332.
13.
HawkridgeD. G. et al. (1968) A study of selected exemplary programs for the education of disadvantaged children: part II. Final report. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
14.
HorowitzI. L.KatzJ. E. (1975) Science and Public Policy in the United States. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
15.
JencksC. (1966) Education: the racial gap. Findings of James Coleman's study. New Republic155 (October 1): 21–26.
16.
JensenA. R. (1969) How much can we boost I.Q. and scholastic achievement?Harvard Educ Rev. 39: 1–123.
17.
LevitanS. A.TaggartR. (1976) The Promise of Greatness. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
18.
LopateC.FlaxmanE.BynumE.GordonE. W. (1970) Some effects of parent and community participation on public education. Rev. of Educ. Research (February).
19.
MarchJ. G. (1972) Model bias in social action. Rev. of Educ. Research42: 413–429.
20.
MayeskeG. W. et al. (1973) A Study of the Achievement of Our Nation's Students. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
21.
McLAUGHLINM. W. (1974) Evaluation and reform: the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, Title I. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
22.
MillerL. P.GordonE. W. [eds.] (1974) Equality of Educational Opportunity. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
23.
MillerL. P.SommerfieldD. A. (1970) The black and white of educational research. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Minneapolis, March 2-6.
24.
PilisukM.PilisukP. (1973) How We Lost the War on Poverty. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
25.
RayderN. F. (1977) Educational evaluation and public policy: proceedings of an invitational conference exploring the social and humanistic impact of educational evaluation and its relation to public policy. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
26.
ReickenH. W. et al. (1975) Social Experimentation: Method for Planning and Evaluating Social Programs. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
27.
SchrammW. (1976) The second harvest of two research-producing events: the Surgeon-General's inquiry and Sesame Street. Proceedings of the National Academy of Education 3: 151–219.
28.
ShuyR. W. (1969) A linguistic background for developing beginning reading materials for Black children, in BaratzJ. C.ShuyR. (eds.) Teaching Black Children to Read. Washington, D.C: Center for Applied Linguistics.
29.
TempoG. (1968) Survey and analysis of Title I funding for compensatory education. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
30.
U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (1972) The Effectiveness of Compensatory Education. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
31.
WargoM. J. et al. (1972) ESEA Title I: a reanalysis and synthesis of evaluation data from fiscal year 1965 through 1970. Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
32.
WeissC. H. (1970) The politicization of evaluation research. J. of Social Issues26: 57–68.
