Enhancing School Appeal: How Experiential Marketing Influences Perceived School Attractiveness in the Urban Context

Abstract

This study explores the mechanisms that underlie the effect of school marketing strategies on parents’ perceived school attractiveness, particularly emphasizing the mediating role of parents’ perceptions of being welcomed in urban schools. Additionally, we investigated how schools’ marketing strategies work differently among parents with different value orientations toward schooling. Structural Equation Modeling and Cluster Analysis Data were applied to analyze 510 questionnaires collected from parents. Two experiential marketing strategies, namely, one-way disseminating materials and interactive social networking, impacted parents’ perceived attractiveness of schools differently with the feeling of being welcomed mediating the relationship between parents and schools. Additionally, parents’ value orientations toward schooling could be classified into three profiles. The results suggest that schools should consider parents’ needs and preferences concerning their children’s schooling and employ appropriate marketing strategies to engage different types of parents. To facilitate this outcome, individualized interaction is necessary to accommodate the diverse needs of parents. The overall structural equation model validates the mechanism of experiential marketing in influencing parental perceptions, and the cluster analysis underscores the need to explore the complex relationship between parents’ educational priorities and their interpretation of marketing strategies.

Keywords

experiential marketing perceived school attractiveness parents’ perception school marketing strategies value orientations toward schooling

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

Kern

M. L.

Vella-Brodrick

Hattie

Waters

(2018). What schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(1), 1–34.

Berends

(2015). Sociology and school choice: What we know after two decades of charter schools. The Annual Review of Sociology, 41(1), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112340

Berkowitz

Astor

R. A.

Pineda

DePedro

K. T.

Weiss

E. L.

Benbenishty

(2021). Parental involvement and perceptions of school climate in California. Urban Education, 56(3), 393–423.

Bloemer

De Ruyter

K. O.

Wetzels

(1999). Linking perceived service quality and service loyalty: A multi-dimensional perspective. European Journal of Marketing, 33(11/12), 1082–1106.

Bosetti. (2004). Determinants of school choice: understanding how parents choose elementary schools in Alberta. Journal of Education Policy, 19(4), 387–405.

Buddin

(2012). The impact of charter schools on public and private school enrolments (Policy Analysis No. 707). Cato Institute. Retrieved April 16, 2023, from https://www.cato.org/policy-analysis/impact-charter-schools-public-private-school-enrollments

Butler

J. S.

Carr

D. A.

Toma

E. F.

Zimmer

(2013). Choice in a world of new school types. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management: [The Journal of the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management], 32(4), 785–806. https://doi.org/10.1002/pam.21711

Chan

C. K. Y.

Yeung

N. C. J.

(2020). Rethinking the “tiger parent” stereotypes: Parents’ choice of primary school for their kindergarten children in Hong Kong. Journal of School Choice, 14(3), 325–348.

Curry

K. A.

Holter

(2019). The influence of parent social networks on parent perceptions and motivation for involvement. Urban Education, 54(4), 535–563.

10.

Curry

K. A.

Jean-Marie

Adams

C. M.

(2016). Social networks and parent motivational beliefs: Evidence from an urban school district. Educational Administration Quarterly: EAQ, 52(5), 841–877.

11.

Dâmaso

Lima

J. Á. D.

(2020). Marketing the school? How local context shapes school marketing practices. Journal of School Choice, 14(1), 26–48.

12.

Delale-O’Connor

(2019). Understanding Achilles’ heel: Information dissemination, readability, and marketing in urban school choice. Education and Urban Society, 51(8), 1007–1028.

13.

Department of Health, HKSAR. (2022, October 5). Crude birth rate (CBR) and crude death rate (CDR), 1981–2021. Retrieved November 25, 2022, from https://www.chp.gov.hk/tc/statistics/data/10/27/112.html

14.

Deslandes

Bertrand

(2005). Motivation of parent involvement in secondary-level schooling. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 164–175.

15.

Dronkers

Avram

(2010). A cross-national analysis of the relations of school choice and effectiveness differences between private-dependent and public schools. Educational Research and Evaluation, 16(2), 151–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2010.484977

16.

Everitt

B. S.

Landau

Leese

Stahl

(2011). Cluster analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

17.

Ford

(2016). Changes in school enrollment patterns after the first-time release of school-level test scores in Milwaukee’s school voucher program: A first look. Education and Urban Society, 48(5), 460–478.

18.

Foroudi

Jin

Gupta

Melewar

Foroudi

M. M.

(2016). Influence of innovation capability and customer experience on reputation and loyalty. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 69(11), 4882–4889.

19.

Greaves

Wilson

Nairn

(2023). Marketing and school choice: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 00346543221141658. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654322114165

20.

Guan

Wang

Guo

Chan

J. H.

(2021). Customer experience and brand loyalty in the full-service hotel sector: The role of brand affect. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(5), 1620–1645.

21.

Hallinger

(2011). Leadership for learning: Lessons from 40 years of empirical research. Journal of Educational Administration, 49(2), 125–142.

22.

Heck

R. H.

Thomas

S. L.

(2020). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques: MLM and SEM approaches. Routledge.

23.

Hill

N. E.

Tyson

D. F.

(2009). Parental involvement in middle school: A meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763.

24.

M. C. S.

(2019). School competition in Hong Kong: a battle of lifting school academic performance? International Journal of Educational Management, 33(7), 1483–1500.

25.

Hoover-Dempsey

K. V.

Ice

C. L.

Whitaker

M. C.

(2009). We’reway past reading together: Why and how parental involvement in adolescence makes sense. In Hill

N. E.

Chao

R. K.

(Eds.), Families, schools, and the adolescent: Connecting research, policy, and practice (pp. 19–36). Teachers College Press.

26.

Ishizuka

(2019). Social class, gender, and contemporary parenting standards in the United States: Evidence from a national survey experiment. Social Forces; A Scientific Medium of Social Study and Interpretation, 98(1), 31–58.

27.

Jeynes

W. H.

(2010). The salience of the subtle aspects of parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 747–774. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811011200311

28.

Kennedy

(2008). A guide to econometrics. John Wiley & Sons.

29.

Khan

S. S.

Ahmad

(2004). Cluster center initialization algorithm for K-means clustering. Pattern Recognition Letters, 25(11), 1293–1302.

30.

Kim

S. Y.

Wang

Orozco-Lapray

Shen

Murtuza

(2013). Does “tiger parenting” exist? Parenting profiles of Chinese Americans and adolescent developmental outcomes. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(1), 7–18.

31.

Kim

(2001). Searching for the organization-public relationship: A valid and reliable instrument. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 799–815.

32.

Lareau

(2003). Unequal childhoods: Class, race, and family life. University of California Press.

33.

Lee

T. T.

(2021). Social class, intensive parenting norms and parental values for children. Current Sociology, Advance online publication.

34.

Lee

T. T.

(2022a). Leadership for inclusive online learning in public primary schools during COVID-19: A multiple case study in Hong Kong. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, Advance online publication.

35.

Lee

T. T.

(2022b). Towards a textural sociological approach to single mothers’ voices: A study of Hong Kong mothers, Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, Advance online publication.

36.

Lee

T. T. L.

Kwan

B. Y. M.

(2019). Neoliberal challenges in context: A case of Hong Kong. The International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 641–652.

37.

Lubienski

(2007). Marketing schools: Consumer goods and competitive incentives for consumer information. Education and Urban Society, 40(1), 118–141.

38.

Lubienski

Lee

(2016). Competitive incentives and the education market: How charter schools define themselves in metropolitan Detroit. Peabody Journal of Education, 91(1), 64–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956x.2016.1119582

39.

Lukosius

Festervand

T. A.

(2013). Marketing study abroad programs: A student recruitment model. American Journal of Business Education (AJBE), 6(5), 483–494.

40.

Maguire

Ball

S. J.

MacRae

(2001). In all our interests: Internal marketing at Northwark Park School. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 35–50.

41.

Oplatka

Nupar

(2012). The components and determinants of school reputation: Insights from parents’ voices. Education and Society, 30(1), 37–52.

42.

Pan

Reichert

de la Torre

Law

(2022). Measuring digital literacy during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences with remote assessment in Hong Kong. Educational Measurement Issues and Practice, 41(1), 46–50.

43.

Povey

Campbell

A. K.

Willis

L. D.

Haynes

Western

Bennett

Antrobus

Pedde

(2016). Engaging parents in schools and building parent-school partnerships: The role of school and parent organisation leadership. International Journal of Educational Research, 79, 128–141.

44.

Reininger

Santana López

(2017). Parental involvement in municipal schools in Chile: Why do parents choose to get involved? School Psychology International, 38(4), 363–379.

45.

Rohde

L. A.

Campani

Oliveira

J. R. G.

Rohde

C. W.

Rocha

Ramal

(2019). Parental reasons for school choice in elementary school: A systematic review. Journal of School Choice, 13(3), 287–304.

46.

Sattin-Bajaj

Roda

(2020). Opportunity hoarding in school choice contexts: The role of policy design in promoting middle-class parents’ exclusionary behaviors. Educational Policy, 34(7), 992–1035.

47.

Sheldon

S. B.

(2002). Parents’ social networks and beliefs as predictors of parent involvement. The Elementary School Journal, 102(4), 301–316.

48.

Sikkink

(2012). Religious school differences in school climate and academic mission: A descriptive overview of school organization and student outcomes. Journal of School Choice, 6(1), 20–39.

49.

Skandalis

Byrom

Banister

(2019). Experiential marketing and the changing nature of extraordinary experiences in post-postmodern consumer culture. Journal of Business Research - Turk, 97, 43–50.

50.

Steiger

J. H.

(2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893–898.

51.

Thapa

Cohen

Guffey

Higgins-D’Alessandro

(2013). A review of school climate research. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 357–385.

52.

Turner

(2018). Marketing diversity: Selling school districts in a racialized marketplace. Journal of Education Policy, 33(6), 793–817.

53.

Walker

Ice

Hoover-Dempsey

Sandler

(2011). Latino parents' motivations for involvement in their children's Schooling: An Exploratory Study. The Elementary School Journal, 111(3), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1086/657653

54.

Yuan

Y. H.

(2008). Relationships among experiential marketing, experiential value, and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 32(3), 387–410.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB