A qualitative content analysis was employed to examine what factors contributed to effective teachers’ selection and retention in urban high poverty schools. First, the Star Teacher Interview was used to identify effective urban educators. Then, verbal interviews were conducted with star subjects to determine factors that contributed to their selection and decision to remain in urban high-poverty districts. An inductive analysis process revealed emerging and reoccurring themes. Four major factors were identified that influenced STAR teachers’ decision to begin their career in an urban school district and/or Title I school: Giving back to the community, diversity, location, and autonomy. Three major factors were identified that influenced STAR teachers’ decision to continue their career beyond 5 years in an urban school district and/or Title I school: Job satisfaction, effective with population, and perseverance. Implications of this study suggest that urban districts work closely with practicum and observation students from the universities who show promise in working with culturally diverse children. Providing teacher candidates with rich experiences in urban schools may positively impact their decision to work in urban settings.
Abbate-VaughnJ.FrechonO.WrightB. (2010). Accomplished urban teaching. Theory Into Practice, 49(3), 185–192.
2.
AllenM. B. (2005). Eight questions on teacher recruitment and retention: What does the research say. Education Commission of the States, 1–145.
3.
AllensworthE.PonisciakS.MazzeoC. (2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago Public Schools. Consortium on Chicago School Research.
4.
Amrein-BeardsleyA. (2012). Recruiting expert teachers in high-needs schools: Leadership, money, and colleagues. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 20, 27.
5.
Baker-DoyleK. (2010). Beyond the labor market paradigm: A social network perspective on teacher recruitment and retention. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18, 26. http://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/836
6.
BaronE.RusnakT.BrookhartS.BurrettK.WhordleyD. (1992). Collaborative urban education: Characteristics of successful urban teachers [Paper presentation]. AASA Convention, San Diego, CA, United States.
7.
BloomC.OwensE. (2011). Principals’ perception of influence on factors affecting Student achievement in low-and high-achieving urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 45(2), 208–233.
8.
BodurY. (2012). Impact of course and fieldwork on multicultural beliefs and attitudes. Educational Forum, 76, 41–56.
9.
BormanG.DowlingN. (2008). Teacher attrition and retention: A meta-analytic and narrative review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 78(3), 367.
10.
BoydD.LankfordH.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2005). The draw of home: How teachers’ preferences for proximity disadvantage urban schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(1), 113–132.
11.
BrunettiG. J. (2001). Why do they teach? A study of job satisfaction among long-term high school teachers. Teacher Education Quarterly, 28(3), 49–74.
12.
BurkhauserS. (2016). How much do school principals matter when it comes to teacher working conditions?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1), 126–145.
13.
BursteinN.CzechM.KretschmerD.LombardiJ.SmithC. (2009). Providing qualified teachers for urban schools. The effectiveness of the accelerated collaborative teacher preparation program in recruiting, preparing, and retaining teachers. Action in Teacher Education, 31, 24–37.
14.
CampbellR.DempseyA.MargolinE.MathewsonG.ReichbachE. (1983). Basic competencies and characteristics of the successful urban teacher [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Orlando, FL, United States.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE Publications.
17.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
18.
Darling-HammondL. (1997). Doing what matters most: Investing in quality teaching. National Council on Teaching and America’s Future.
19.
Darling-HammondL. (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state Policy evidence. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy, University of Washington.
20.
DouD.DevosG.ValckeM. (2016). The relationships between school autonomy gap, principal leadership, teachers’ job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 42(4), 443–444.
FreedmanS.ApplemanD. (2009). In it for the long haul: How teacher education can contribute to teacher retention in high-poverty, urban schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(3), 323–337.
23.
GlennieE.CobleC.AllenM. (2004). Teachers’ perceptions of the work environment in hard to staff schools. Education Commission of the States. Duke University.
24.
GuskeyT. R. (2014). Class rank weighs down true learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(6), 15–19.
25.
HabermanM. (1986). Alternative teacher certification programs. Action in Teacher Education, 8(2), 13–18.
26.
HabermanM. (1995). Star teachers of children in poverty. Kappa Delta Pi.
27.
HabermanM. (1996). Selecting and preparing culturally competent teachers for urban schools. In SikulaJ. (Ed.), Handbook of research in teacher education (pp. 747–760). Macmillan.
28.
HabermanM. (2005). Star teachers: The ideology and best practice of effective teachers of diverse children and youth in poverty. Haberman Educational Foundation.
29.
HabermanM. (2017). Selecting “star” teachers for children and youth in urban poverty. In Hill-JacksonV.Stafford-JohnsonD. (Eds.), Better teachers, better schools (pp. xiii–xxiii). Information Age Publishing.
30.
HabermanM.RichardsW. (1990). Urban teachers who quit: Why they leave and what they do. Urban Education, 25(3), 297–303.
31.
Haberman Educational Foundation. (2017). Star teacher selection training manual. The Haberman Educational Foundation.
32.
Hill-JacksonV.HartlepN. D.StaffordD. (2019). STAR teacher: 7 disposition that support student learning. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
33.
Hill-JacksonV.StaffordD. (2017). Better teachers, better schools: What star teachers know, believe, and do. Information Age Publishing.
34.
HorngE. (2009). Teacher tradeoffs: Disentangling teachers’ preferences for working conditions and student demographics. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 690.
35.
HughesG. (2012). Teacher retention: Teacher characteristics, school characteristics, organizational characteristics, and teacher efficacy. The Journal of Educational Research, 105, 245–255.
36.
IngersollR. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Education Research Journal, 38(3), 499–534.
37.
IngersollR. (2003). Who controls teachers’ work? Power and accountability in America’s schools. Harvard University Press.
38.
IngersollR. (2004). Why do high-poverty schools have difficulty staffing their classrooms with qualified teachers?Center for American Progress and Institute for America’s Future.
39.
IngersollR.MayH. (2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4): 435–464.
40.
IngersollR.SmithT. (2004). Do teacher induction and mentoring matter?NASSP Bulletin, 88(638), 28–40.
41.
JohnsonS. M. (2011). Teachers at work: Achieving success in our schools. Basic Books, Inc.
42.
JohnsonS. M.BirkelandS. (2003). Pursuing a “Sense of Success”: New Teachers Explain Their Career Decisions. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 581–617.
43.
KaneT. J.RockoffE.StaigerD. O. (2008). What does certification tell us about teacher effectiveness? Evidence from New York City. Economics of Education Review, 27(6), 246–259.
44.
KirchhoffA.LawrenzF. (2011). The use of grounded theory to investigate the role of teacher education on STEM teacher’s career paths in high-need schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 62, 246–259.
45.
KozolJ. (1992). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. Harper Perennial.
46.
KraftM. A.PapayJ. P. (2014). Can Professional Environments in Schools Promote Teacher Development? Explaining Heterogeneity in Returns to Teaching Experience. Educational Effectiveness and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 476–500.
47.
LaddH. (2011). Teachers’ perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 37–62.
48.
Ladson-BillingsG.Darling-HammondL. (2000). The validity of National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS)/Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC) assessments for effective urban teachers: Findings and implication for assessment. National Partnership for Excellence and Accountability in Teaching.
49.
LarkinI. M.Brantley-DiasL.Lokey-VegaA. (2016). Job satisfaction, organizational commitment, and turnover intention of online teachers in the K-12 setting. Online Learning, 20(3), 26–51. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1113339
50.
LathamN. I.VogtW. P. (2007). Do professional development schools reduce teacher attrition? Evidence of a longitudinal study of 1,000 graduates. Journal of Teacher Education, 58, 153–167.
51.
LochmillerC. R.AdachiE.ChesnutC. E.JohnsonJ. (2016). Retention, attrition, and mobility among teachers and administrators in West Virginia. Regional Educational Laboratory Appalachia.
52.
LortieC. D. (1975). School teacher: A sociological study. University of Chicago Press.
MaclaughlinM.TalbertJ. (2001). Professional communities and the work of high school teaching. University of Chicago Press.
56.
MartinN.SassD.SchmittT. (2012). Teacher efficacy in student engagement, instructional management, student stressors, and burnout: A theoretical model using in-class variables to predict teachers’ intent-to-leave. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28, 546–559.
57.
McKinneyS.BerryR.DickersonD.Campbell-WhatelyG. (2007). Addressing Urban high-poverty school teacher attrition by addressing urban high-poverty school teacher retention: Why effective teachers persevere. Educational Research and Review, 3(1), 1–9.
58.
MilanowskiA. T.Longwell-GriceH.SaffoldF.JonesJ.SchomischK.OddenA. (2009). Recruiting new teachers to urban school districts: What incentives will work?International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 4(8), 1–13.
59.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.
60.
PearsonL. C.MoomawW. (2005). The relationship between teacher autonomy and stress, work satisfaction, empowerment, and professionalism. Educational Research Quarterly, 29(1), 31–54.
61.
PerieM.BakerD. P. (1997). Job satisfaction among America’s teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation. NCES 97-00131245221139451. U.S. Department of Education.
62.
PerrachioneB. A.RosserV. J.PetersenG. J. (2008). Why do they stay? Elementary teachers’ perception of job satisfaction and retention. The Professional Educator, 32(2), 25–31.
RivkinS.HanushekE.KaneJ. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73, 417–458.
65.
RobinsonD.LewisC. (2017). Typologies for effectiveness: Characteristics of effective teachers in urban learning environments. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 13, 124–134.
66.
RockoffJ. (2004). The impact of individual teachers on student achievement: Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 94, 247–252.
67.
RonfeldtM.LoebS.WyckoffJ. (2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4–36.
68.
RussellE.WilliamsS.Gleason-GomezC. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of administrative support and antecedents of turnover. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 24, 195–208.
69.
SaleemH. (2015). The impact of leadership styles on job satisfaction and mediating role of perceived organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 172, 563–569.
70.
ShifrerD.TurleyR.HeardH. (2017). Do teachers financial awards improve teacher retention and student achievement in an urban disadvantaged school district?American Educational Research Journal, 54(6), 1117–1153.
71.
ShippV. H. (1999). Factors influencing the career choices of African American collegians: Implications for minority teacher recruitment. The Journal of Negro Education, 68(3), 343–351.
72.
SimonN. S.JohnsonS. M. (2013). Teacher turnover in high-poverty schools: What we know and can do (Working Paper: Project on the Next Generation of Teachers). Harvard Graduate School of Education.
73.
SiwatuK. (2011). Preservice teachers’ sense of preparedness and self-efficacy to teach in America’s urban and suburban schools: Does context matter?Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 357–365.
StotkoE.IngramR.Beaty-O’FerrallM. (2007). Promising strategies for attracting and retaining effective urban teachers. Urban Education, 42(1), 30–51.
76.
StrongeJ. H.WardT. J.TuckerP. D.HindmanJ. L. (2008). What is the relationship between teacher quality and student achievement? An exploratory study. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 20, 165–184.
77.
TaylorA.FrankenbergE. (2009). Understanding prospective teachers’ commitment to urban education. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 327–346.
78.
TraceN. E. L. (2016). The relationship among teacher job satisfaction, trust in the principal, and principal support [Doctoral dissertation]. Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. (Order No. 1463413079).
79.
TyeB. B.O’BrienL. (2002). Why are experienced teachers leaving the profession?Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 24–32.
WeissE. M. (1999). Perceived workplace conditions and first-year teachers’ morale, career choice commitment, and planned retention: A secondary analysis. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15(8), 861–879.
83.
WhippJ.GeronimeL. (2017). Experiences that predict early career teacher commitment to and retention in high-poverty urban schools. Urban Education, 52(7), 799–828.
WorthyJ. (2005). ‘It didn’t have to be so hard’: The first years of teaching in an urban school. InternationalJournal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 18(3), 379–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518390500082699
86.
WronowskiM. (2018). Filling the void: A grounded theory approach to addressing teacher recruitment and retention in urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 50(6), 548–574.
87.
YoungI. P.PlaceA. W.RinehartJ. S.JuryJ. C.BaitsD. F. (1997). Teacher recruitment: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis for race and sex. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(1), 86–106.
