School Choice,Local Discretion,and Stratification: Evidence From Inter-district Open Enrollment in Metro Detroit

Abstract

School choice policies can, by design or in implementation, give schools and districts discretion over enrollment. In this study, I examine the effect of local discretion over inter-district open enrollment on non-resident enrollment. I use longitudinal data on open enrollment patterns and policies in the metropolitan Detroit area. I find that when districts set more restrictive open enrollment policies, they enroll fewer new non-resident students overall, due to a decrease in new Black, Hispanic, and low-income non-resident students specifically. When districts allow inter-district open enrollment, racial and socioeconomic segregation within those districts do not change, and racial isolation slightly increases. My findings suggest that regulating enrollment policies to reduce discretionary exclusion can increase access to inter-district choice for some low-income and racially minoritized students, but that these kinds of policy changes are unlikely to reduce racial segregation and socioeconomic stratification more broadly.

Keywords

school choice stratification segregation local discretion policy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alcaino

Jennings

J. L.

(2020). How increased school choice affects public school enrollment and school segregation. (EdWorkingPaper: 20-258). Annenberg Institute at Brown University.

Archbald

D. A.

(2000). School choice and school stratification: Shortcomings of the stratification critique and recommendations for theory and research. Educational Policy, 14(2), 214–240.

Bethencourt

. (2015). Highland park parents seek options as high school shuts. Detroit Free Press. https://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/wayne/2015/06/08/highland-park-high-school-closure/28713865/

Bowe

Gewirtz

Ball

S. J.

(1994). Captured by the discourse? Issues and concerns in researching ‘parental choice’. Education and Society, 15(1), 63–78.

Bulkley

Marsh

J. A.

Mulfinger

(2021). States can play a stronger role in promoting equity and access in school choice. National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice.

Cohen

(2021). “A marketplace of schools”: Race, power, and education reform in the Detroit region. Urban Geography, 42(8), 1170–1194.

Cohodes

Corcoran

Jennings

Sattin-Bajaj

(2022). When do informational interventions work? Experimental evidence from New York City High School Choice. No. w29690. National Bureau of Economic Research.

Cowen

J. M.

(2017). Who are the homeless? Student mobility and achievement in Michigan 2010–2013. Educational Researcher, 46(1), 33–43.

Cowen

J. M.

Creed

Keesler

V. A.

(2015). Dynamic participation in inter-district open enrollment: Evidence from Michigan, 2005-2013. Education Policy Center, Michigan State University. https://education.msu.edu/EPC/library/papers/WP-49-Dynamic-Participation-in-Open-Enrollment-Cowen/

10.

de Chaisemartin

D’Haultfoeuille

. (2022). Two-way fixed effects and differences-in-differences with heterogeneous treatment effects: A survey. No. w29691. National Bureau of Economic Research.

11.

Education Commission of the States. (2022). Open enrollment policies, 2022: Does the state permit interdistrict open enrollment? Is interdistrict open enrollment mandatory or voluntary? 50-state comparison. Education Commission of the States.

12.

Edwards

D. S.

(2021). Just out of reach? Unrestrained supply, constrained demand, and access to effective schools in and around Detroit. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 43(3), 391–418.

13.

Edwards

D. S.

Anderson

K. P.

(2022). Do public school choice policies segregate schools? Casual effects in Michigan [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Denver.

14.

Edwards

D. S.

Cowen

J. M.

(2019). Who chooses? Charter and non-resident school enrollment in Michigan (Policy brief). Education Policy Innovation Collaborative. https://epicedpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/EPIC_Choice_Policy_Brief_June2019.pdf

15.

Edwards

D. S.

Cowen

J. M.

(2022). The roles of residential mobility and distance in participation in public school choice. National Center for Research on Education Access and Choice. https://reachcentered.org/publications/the-roles-of-residential-mobility-and-distance-in-participation-in-public-school-choice

16.

Fong

Faude

(2018). Timing is everything: Late registration and stratified access to school choice. Sociology of Education, 91(3), 242–262.

17.

Harris

D. N.

Valant

Gross

(2015). The New Orleans OneApp: Centralized enrollment matches students and schools of choice. Education Next, 15(4), 17–23.

18.

Holme

J. J.

Finnigan

K. S.

(2018). Striving in common: A regional equity framework for urban schools. Harvard Education Press.

19.

Honey

Carrasco

(2022). A new admission system in Chile and its foreseen moderate impact on access for low-income students. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737221093374

20.

Jabbar

Daramola

E. J.

Marsh

J. A.

Enoch-Stevens

Alonso

Allbright

T. N.

(2022). Social construction is racial construction: Examining the target populations in school-choice policies. American Journal of Education, 128(3), 487–518.

21.

Jennings

J. L.

(2010). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247.

22.

Kho

Zimmer

McEachin

(2022). A descriptive analysis of cream skimming and pushout in choice versus traditional public schools. Education Finance and Policy, 17(1), 160–187.

23.

Ladd

H. F.

Fiske

E. B.

(2021). Equity-oriented accountability for charter schools: Lessons from Massachusetts (EdWorkingPaper: 21-353), Annenberg Institute at Brown University.

24.

Lareau

Adia Evans

Yee

(2016). The rules of the game and the uncertain transmission of advantage: Middle-class parents’ search for an urban kindergarten. Sociology of Education, 89(4), 279–299.

25.

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2020). Unregulated open enrollment and inequitable access to schools of choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 95(3), 248–271.

26.

Lenhoff

S. W.

Singer

Pogodzinski

Cook

(2022). Exiting Detroit for school: Inequitable choice sets and school quality. Journal of Education Policy, 37(4), 590–612.

27.

Lincove

J. A.

Valant

Cowen

J. M.

(2018). You can’t always get what you want: Capacity constraints in a choice-based school system. Economics of Education Review, 67, 94–109.

28.

Marcotte

D. E.

Dalane

(2019). Socioeconomic segregation and school choice in American public schools. Educational Researcher, 48(8), 493–503.

29.

Massey

D. S.

Denton

N. A.

(1988). The dimensions of residential segregation. Social Forces, 67(2), 281–315.

30.

Mommandi

Welner

(2021). School’s choice: How charter schools control access and shape enrollment. Teachers College Press.

31.

Monarrez

(2022). School attendance boundaries and the segregation of public schools in the U.S. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics.

32.

Monarrez

Chien

(2021). Dividing lines: Racially unequal school boundaries in US public school systems. Urban Institute. https://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/104736/dividing-lines-racially-unequal-school-boundaries-in-us-public-school-systems.pdf

33.

Monarrez

Kisida

Chingos

(2022). The effect of charter schools on school segregation. American Economic Journal Economic Policy, 14(1), 301–340.

34.

Pogodzinski

Lenhoff

S. W.

Addonizio

(2019). The relationship between open enrollment and school bond voting. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(3), 510–534.

35.

Pogodzinski

Lenhoff

S. W.

Addonizio

M. F.

(2018). The push and pull of open enrolment policy in metro Detroit. Educational Review, 70(5), 622–642.

36.

Pondiscio

(2019). How the over half learns: Equality, excellence, and the battle over school choice. Penguin Random House LLC.

37.

Reardon

S. F.

Townsend

J. B.

(1999). SEG: Stata module to compute multiple-group diversity and segregation indices, statistical software components S375001. Boston College Department of Economics.

38.

Sampson

Garcia

D. R.

Hom

M. O.

Bertrand

(2022). Open enrollment and disrupting the political ecology of U.S. public education. Peabody Journal of Education, 97(1), 62–73.

39.

Schwalbach

(2022). Three states are rethinking the relationships between housing and education quality. RealClear Education. https://www.realcleareducation.com/articles/2022/04/08/three_states_are_rethinking_the_relationship_between_housing_and_education_quality_110722.html

40.

Singer

Lenhoff

S. W.

(2022). Race, geography, and school choice policy: A critical analysis of Detroit students’ suburban school choices. AERA Open, 8(1), 1–19.

41.

Smith

(2013). Inkster schools first to be dissolved; students split across 4 districts. MLive. https://www.mlive.com/education/2013/07/inkster_first_schools_to_be_di.html

42.

Wall

(2022). N.J. lawsuit says district choice could help desegregate schools. Would it work? Chalkbeat Newark. https://newark.chalkbeat.org/2022/3/10/22971263/new-jersey-school-district-choice-lawsuit-racial-segregation

43.

Wells

A. S.

Keener

Cabral

Cordova-Cobo

(2019). The more things change, the more they stay the same: The resegregation of public schools via charter school reform. Peabody Journal of Education, 94(5), 471–492.

44.

Winters

M. A.

Park

(2022). Enrollment flexibility and charter school impacts: The effects of backfill on students in Massachusetts charter middle schools (Working Paper, 2022-3). Wheelock Educational Policy Center, Boston University.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.09 MB