The current study investigated the effects of school mobility on the academic achievement of different racial/ethnic groups in four cohorts of students from a very large urban school district. In this study, I compared within-year and between-year mobility and, most importantly, account for all the schools students attended over the study period. Using a multiple membership model (MMM), the findings confirmed that, for all student groups, academic achievement was affected more by within-year school mobility than between-year school mobility. Black students had the highest mobility rates, both for between- and within-year mobility. Although Asian-American students achieved higher reading and math scores on average, they were more negatively impacted by within-year school mobility compared to other groups. The current study was able to pinpoint the students most at risk for negative outcomes following within-year mobility. The findings are discussed in the context of policy recommendations that can be adopted by school districts.
AikenL. S.WestS. G.RenoR. R. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
2.
AlexanderK. L.EntwisleD. R.DauberS. L. (1996). Children in motion: School transfers and elementary school performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 3–12.
3.
AshbyC. M. (2010). K-12 education: Many challenges arise in educating students who change schools frequently (Report to congressional requesters, GAO-11-40). US Government Accountability Office.
4.
AstoneN. M.McLanahanS. S. (1994). Family structure, residential mobility, and school dropout: A research note. Demography, 31(4), 575–584.
BurkamD. T.LeeV. E.DwyerJ. (2009, June29–30). School mobility in the early elementary grades: Frequency and impact from nationally-representative data [Paper presentation]. Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, Washington, DC.
7.
ChandolaT.ClarkeP.WigginsR. D.BartleyM. (2005). Who you live with and where you live: Setting the context for health using multiple membership multilevel models. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(2), 170–175.
8.
ColemanJ. S.ColemanJ. S. (1994). Foundations of social theory. Harvard University Press.
9.
EngecN. (2006). Relationship between mobility and student performance and behavior. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(3), 167–178.
10.
FielJ. E.HaskinsA. R.TurleyR. N. L. (2013). Reducing school mobility: A randomized trial of a relationship-building intervention. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1188–1218.
11.
FitchenJ. M. (1994). Residential mobility among the rural poor. Rural Sociology, 59(3), 416–436.
12.
FongA. B.BaeS.HuangM. (2010). Patterns of student mobility among English language learner students in Arizona Public Schools. Issues & Answers. REL 2010-No. 093 (Research reports). Regional Educational Laboratory West.
13.
GasperJ.DeLucaS.EstacionA. (2010). Coming and going: Explaining the effects of residential and school mobility on adolescent delinquency. Social Science Research, 39(3), 459–476.
14.
GasperJ.DeLucaS.EstacionA. (2012). Switching schools: Revisiting the relationship between school mobility and high school dropout. American Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 487–519.
15.
GriggJ. (2012). School enrollment changes and student achievement growth: A case study in educational disruption and continuity. Sociology of Education, 85(4), 388–404.
16.
HanushekE. A.KainJ. F.RivkinS. G. (2004). Disruption versus Tiebout improvement: The costs and benefits of switching schools. Journal of Public Economics, 88(9–10), 1721–1746.
17.
HeinleinL. M.ShinnM. (2000). School mobility and student achievement in an urban setting. Psychology in the Schools, 37(4), 349–357.
18.
HillP. W.GoldsteinH. (1998). Multilevel modeling of educational data with cross-classification and missing identification for units. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(2), 117–128.
19.
HolmeJ. J.RichardsM. P. (2009). School choice and stratification in a regional context: Examining the role of inter-district choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 150–171.
20.
IngersollG. M.ScammanJ. P.EckerlingW. D. (1989). Geographic mobility and student achievement in an urban setting. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(2), 143–149.
21.
KainJ. F.O’BrienD. M. (1998). A longitudinal assessment of reading achievement: Evidence from the Harvard/UTD Texas Schools Project. University of Texas at Dallas.
22.
KerbowD. (1996). Patterns of urban student mobility and local school reform. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 1(2), 147–169.
23.
LeckieG. (2009). The complexity of school and neighbourhood effects and movements of pupils on school differences in models of educational achievement. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 172(3), 537–554.
24.
LeckieG. (2013). Multiple membership multilevel models. Centre for Multilevel Modelling.
25.
LeeJ.ZhouM. (2015). The Asian American achievement paradox. Russell Sage Foundation.
26.
MaoM. X. (1997). Student mobility, academic performance, and school accountability. A Study of Student Mobility in Texas Public Schools, Statewide Texas Educational Progress Study Report (3), 349–355. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED409380.pdf
27.
MaroulisS.SantillanoR.JabbarH.HarrisD. N. (2019). The push and pull of school performance: Evidence from student mobility in New Orleans. American Journal of Education, 125(3), 345–380.
28.
MetzgerM. W.FowlerP. J.AndersonC. L.LindsayC. A. (2015). Residential mobility during adolescence: Do even “upward” moves predict dropout risk?Social Science Research, 53, 218–230.
29.
NelsonP. S.SimoniJ. M.AdelmanH. S. (1996). Mobility and school functioning in the early grades. The Journal of Educational Research, 89(6), 365–369.
30.
ReynoldsA. J.ChenC. C.HerbersJ. E. (2009, June29–30). School mobility and educational success: A research synthesis and evidence on prevention [Paper presentation]. Workshop on the Impact of Mobility and Change on the Lives of Young Children, Schools, and Neighborhoods, Washington, DC.
31.
RumbergerR. W. (2015). Student mobility: Causes, consequences, and solutions. National Education Policy Center.
32.
RumbergerR. W.LarsonK. A.ReamR. K.PalardyG. J. (1999). The educational consequences of mobility for California students and schools (Research reports). Policy Analysis for California Education.
33.
SchwartzA. E.StiefelL.CordesS. (2012, October3). Moving matters: The causal effect of school mobility on student performance [Conference session]. Annual Conference of the Association for Education Finance and Policy, Institute for Education and Social Policy, Steinhardt and Wagner Schools, New York University.
34.
SouthS. J.HaynieD. L.BoseS. (2007). Student mobility and school dropout. Social Science Research, 36(1), 68–94.
35.
SwansonC. B.SchneiderB. (1999). Students on the move: Residential and educational mobility in America’s schools. Sociology of Education, 72(1), 54–67.
36.
XuZ.HannawayJ.D’SouzaS. (2009). Student transience in North Carolina: The effect of school mobility on student outcomes using longitudinal data (Working Paper No. 22). National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research.
