Expanding after School Program Access for Vulnerable Students: Examining the Efficacy of Federal Policy and Funding

Abstract

After school programs provide low income students and students of color with learning opportunities across both academic and non-academic domains that such students would otherwise not get. In this study, we examined the intersection of school characteristics (e.g., enrollment size, percent minority enrolled, and percent eligible for FARM) and the types of after school programming schools offered (e.g., fee-based, 21st CCLC, and other types) using binary logistic regression models. I n a sample of schools (n = 1,601) surveyed by the National Center on Education Statistics 2008 FRSS, we found that under-resourced schools had lower odds of having a 21st CCLC program and higher odds of having a fee-based after school program (than schools with a lower percentage of students receiving FARM). That is counter to the stated goals of the 21st CCLC program. These findings highlight the need for a re-prioritization of 21st CCLC funding such that financial assistance provided to schools to support after school programs is allocated to schools serving students from low income families and communities.

Keywords

educational policy school reform social justice school improvement students

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Afterschool Alliance. (2014). Keeping kids safe and supported in the hours after school. http://afterschoolalliance.org/documents/issue_briefs/issue_KeepingKidsSafe_65.pdf

Balfanz

Legters

(2006). Closing ‘dropout factories’: The graduation-rate crisis we know, and what can be done about it. Education Week, 25(42), 42–43.

Catalano

R. F.

Berlund

M. L.

Ryan

J. A. M.

Lonczak

H. S.

Hawkins

J. D.

(2004). Positive youth development in the United States: Research finding on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 98–124.

Dryfoos

J. G.

(1999). The role of the school in children’s out-of-school time. The Future of Children, 9, 117–134.

Durlak

J. A.

Weissberg

R. P.

(2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.

Emig

Moore

Scarupa

H. J.

(2001). School readiness: Helping communities get children ready for school and school ready for children. Child Trends.

Ersing

R. L.

(2009). Building the capacity of youths through community cultural arts: A positive youth development perspective. Best Practice in Mental Health, 5(1), 26–43.

Fredricks

J. A.

Simpkins

S. D.

(2012). Promoting positive youth development through organized after-school activities: Taking a closer look at participation of ethnic minority youth. Child Development Perspectives, 6(3), 280–287.

Fuller

R. D.

Percy

V. E.

Bruening

J. E.

Cotrufo

R. J.

(2013). Positive youth development: Minority male participation in a sports-based afterschool program in an urban environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 84(4), 469–482.

10.

Guskey

T. R.

(2011). Stability and change in high school grades. NASSP Bulletin, 95(2), 85–98.

11.

Hemphill

F. C.

Vanneman

(2011). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2011-459). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

12.

Hopson

L. M.

Lee

(2011). Mitigating the effect of family poverty on academic and behavioral outcomes: The role of school climate in middle and high school. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(11), 2221–2229.

13.

Kraft

N. P.

(2001). Critical characteristics of successful after-school programs: An evaluation of the 21st century initiative [Paper presentation]. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA, United States.

14.

Lerner

R. M.

(2004). Liberty: Thriving and civic engagement among American youth. SAGE.

15.

Mahoney

J. L.

Lord

Carryl

(2005). An ecological analysis of after-school program participation and the development of academic performance and motivational attributes for disadvantaged children. Child Development, 76(4), 811–825.

16.

Posner

J. K.

Vandell

D. L.

(1999). After-school activities and the development of low-income urban children: A longitudinal study. Journal of Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 868–879.

17.

Roth

J. L.

Brooks-Gunn

(2003). What exactly is a youth development program? Answers from research and practice. Applied Developmental Science, 7(2), 94–111.

18.

Stetser

Stillwell

(2014). Public high school four-year on-time graduation rates and event dropout rates: School years 2010–11 and 2011–12. First look (NCES 2014-391). U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2014/2014391.pdf

19.

Tavernise

(2012, February 9). Education gap grows between rich and poor, studies say. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/10/education/education-gap-grows-between-rich-and-poor-studies-show.html

20.

U.S. Department of Education (2015). 21st Century Community Learning Centers (21st CCLC) analytic support for evaluation and program monitoring: An overview of the 21st CCLC performance data: 2013–14 (10th report). Washington, DC.

21.

Woolley

M. E.

Bowen

G. L.

(2007). In the context of risk: Supportive adults and the school engagement of middle school students. Family Relations, 56(1), 92–104.

22.

Woolley

M. E.

Strutchens

M. E.

Gilbert

M. C.

Martin

W. G.

(2010). Student motivation and the math success of black middle school students: Direct and indirect effects of teacher expectations and reform practices. The Negro Educational Review, 61(1–4), 41–59.