Standardized testing is an applauded system of testing due to the uniformity that it offers. The idea is that in standardized testing, because every student is being asked exactly the same question and each question has only one specific answer, standardized examinations are neutral, value free, and exonerated from the subjectivity that an examiner or teacher may inhibit. The reality is far from it. Using a Foucauldian panoptic perspective and focusing on what is known as the aptitude or entrance examination, I argue that standardized examinations are designed in such a way that bilingual and minority students shall not score on par with their monolingual majority counterparts. The questions are designed in such a way that those students who code switch (due to bilingualism) are placed at a disadvantage. Similarly, the culture represented in the examination is White middle class, hence making the examination relatively more difficult for minority students.
AltheideD. L. (2013). Media logic, social control and fear. Communication Theory, 23(3), 223–238.
2.
AmbrosioJ. (2013). Changing the subject: Neoliberalism and accountability in public education. Educational Studies, 49(4), 316–333.
3.
AngelisG. D. (2014). A multilingual approach to analysing standardized test results: Immigrant primary school children and the role of languages spoken in a bi-/multilingual community. Intercultural Education, 25(1), 14–28.
4.
AshtonE. (2014). I’ve got my EYE on you: Schooled readiness, standardized testing and developmental surveillance. Journal of the Canadian Association for Young Children, 39(1), 3–24.
5.
AuW. (2013). Hiding behind high-stakes testing: Meritocracy, objectivity and inequality in U.S. education. International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives, 12(2), 7–19.
6.
AuW. (2016). Meritocracy 2.0: High-stakes standardized testing as a racial project of neoliberal multiculturalism. Educational Policy, 30(1), 39–62.
7.
BahrassaN. F.SyedM.SuJ.LeeR. M. (2011). Family conflict and academic performance of first-year Asian American undergraduates. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 17(4), 415–426.
8.
BakerD. P.LetendreG. K. (2005). National differences, global similarities: World culture and the future of schooling. Stanford University Press.
9.
BennettR. E. (2015). The changing nature of educational assessment. Review of Research in Education, 39(1), 370–407.
10.
BerryC. M.BarrattC. L.DovalinaC. L.ZhaoP. (2014). Can racial/ethnic subgroup criterion-to-test standard deviation ratios account for conflicting differing validity and differential prediction evidence for cognitive ability tests?Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 87(1), 208–220.
11.
BondT. N.LangK. (2013). The evolution of the Black–White test score gap in grades K-3: The fragility of results. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(5), 1468–1479.
12.
BuchmannC.CondronD. J.RoscignoV. J. (2010). Shadow education, American style: Test preparation, the SAT and college enrollment. Social Forces, 89(2), 435–462.
13.
BushnellM. (2003). Teachers in the schoolhouse panopticon: Complicity and resistance. Education and Urban Society, 35(3), 251–272.
ByunS.ParkH. (2012). The academic success of East Asian American youth: The role of shadow education. Sociology of Education, 85(1), 40–60.
16.
Carter-FranciqueA.HartA.StewardA. (2013). Black college athletes’ perceptions of academic success and the role of social support. Journal of Intercollegiate Sport, 6(2), 231–246.
17.
ChristensonS. L.DeckerD. M.TriezenbergH. L.YsseldykeJ. E.ReschlyA. (2007). Consequences of high-stakes assessment for students with and without disabilities. Educational Policy, 21(4), 662–690.
18.
ColomaR. S. (2015). “Students are once again ‘numbers’ instead of actual human beings”: Teacher performance assessment and the governing curriculum and teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 5–35.
19.
CondronD. J.TopeD.SteidlC. R.FreemanK. J. (2013). Racial segregation and the black/white achievement gap, 1992 to 2009. The Sociological Quarterly, 54(1), 130–157.
20.
DavidsonC. (2011). Now you see it: How the brain science of attention will transform the way we live, work, and learn. Viking Press.
21.
DuranR. P. (1983). Hispanics’ education and background: Predictors of college achievement. The College Board.
22.
EngelhardG.KobrinJ. L.WindS. A. (2014). Exploring differential subgroup functioning on SAT writing items: What happens when English is not a test taker’s best language?International Journal of Testing, 14(4), 339–359.
23.
FairlieR. W.HoffmannF.OreopoulosP. (2014). A community college instructor like me: Race and ethnicity interactions in the classroom. The American Economic Review, 104(8), 2567–2591.
24.
FlemingJ. (2000). Affirmative action and standardized test scores. The Journal of Negro Education, 69, 27–37.
FoucaultM. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon Books.
27.
GallagherC. J. (2003). Reconciling a tradition of testing with a new paradigm. Educational Psychology Review, 15(1), 83–99.
28.
GallagherM. (2010). “Are schools panoptic?” Surveillance and Society, 7(3–4), 262–272.
29.
GalleherC.RundquistP. J.BarkerD. B.ChangW. (2012). Determining cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of success on the National Physical Therapy Examination. The Internet Journal of Allied Health Sciences and Practice, 10(4), Article 7.
30.
GandaraP.LopezE. (1998). Latino students and the college entrance exam: How much do they really matter?Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 20(1), 17–38.
31.
GoldschneiderA. E. (2006). Cheater’s proof: Excessive judicial deference toward educational testing agencies may leave accused examinees no remedy to clear their names. Brigham Young University Education and Law Journal. http://digitalcommons.law.byu.edu/elj/vol2006/iss1/3
32.
GoldsteinR. A. (2004). Who needs the government to police us when we can do it ourselves? The new panopticon in teaching. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 4(3), 320–328.
33.
GoodK.AronsonJ.InzlichtM. (2003). Improving adolescents standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the efforts of stereotype threat. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(6), 645–662.
34.
HaitanaT.PitamaS.RucklidgeJ. J. (2010). Cultural biases in the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III: Testing Tamariki in a New Zealand sample. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 24–34.
35.
HaskinsA. R. (2014). Unintended consequences: Effects of paternal incarceration on child school readiness and later special education placement. Sociological Science, 1, 141–158.
36.
HedgesL.NowellA. (1998). Black–White test score convergence since 1965. In JencksC.PhillipsM. (Eds.), The Black–White test score gap (pp. 149–181). State University of New York Press.
37.
HellerM. (2003). Globalization, the new economy and the commodification of language and identity. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 7(4), 473–492.
38.
HollarD.MessiahS. E.Lopez-MitnikG.HollarT. L.AlmonM.AgatstonA. S. (2010). Effect of a two-year obesity prevention intervention on percentile changes in body mass index and academic performance in low-income elementary school children. American Journal of Public Health, 100(4), 646–653.
39.
IchouM.HamiltonP. (2013). Different origins and the origin of differences: The academic achievement of children of emigrants/immigrants in France from the start of primary school to the end of compulsory education. Revue Francise de Sociologie, 54, 5–52.
40.
JenningsJ. L.BearakJ. M. (2014). “Teaching to the test” in the NCLB era: How test predictability affects our understanding of student performance. Educational Researcher, 43(8), 381–389.
41.
JensonJ. L.McDanielM. A.WoodardS. M.KummerT. A. (2014). Teaching to the test . . . or testing to teach: Exams requiring higher order thinking skills encourage greater conceptual understanding. Educational Psychology Review, 26(2), 307–329.
42.
KandelI. L. (1936). Examinations and their substitutes in the United States. Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
43.
KearnsL. (2016). The construction of “illiterate” and “literate” youth: The effects of high-stakes standardized literacy testing. Race, Ethnicity and Education, 19(1), 121–140.
44.
KeelsM. (2013). Getting them enrolled is only half the battle: College success as a function of race or ethnicity, gender and class. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 83(2–3), 310–322.
45.
KruseA. J. (2016). Cultural bias in testing: A review of literature and implications for music education. Applications of Research in Music Education, 35(1), 23–31.
LamontM.BeljeanS.MatthewC. (2014). What is missing? Cultural processes and causal pathways to inequality. Socio-Economic Review, 12(3), 573–608.
48.
LardierD. T.HerrK. G.BarriosV. R.Garcia-ReidP.ReidR. J. (2017). Merit in meritocracy: Uncovering the myth of exceptionality and self-reliance through the voices of urban youth of color. Education and Urban Society, 51, 474–500.
49.
LemannN. (2000). The big test: The secret history of the American meritocracy. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
50.
LinnR. L. (2001). A century of standardized testing: Controversies and pendulum swings. Educational Assessment, 7(1), 29–38.
51.
LuggC. A. (2006). Thinking about sodomy: Public schools, legal panopticons and queers. Educational Policy, 20(1), 35–588.
52.
MadausG. F.ClarkeM. (2001). The adverse impact of high stakes testing for minority students: Evidence from 100 years of test data. In OrfieldG.KornhaberM. (Eds.), Raising standards or raising barriers? Inequality and high stakes testing in public education (pp. 85–106). The Century Foundation.
53.
MarchantG. J.PaulsonS. E. (2005). The relationship of high school graduation exams to graduation rates and SAT scores. Education Policy Archives Analysis, 13(6): 1–17.
54.
MathiesenT. (1997). The viewer society. Michel Foucault’s panopticon revisited. Theoretical Criminology, 1(2), 215–234.
55.
MatsuokaR. (2015). School socioeconomic compositional effect on shadow education participation: Evidence from Japan. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 36(2), 270–290.
56.
McDermottM. (2013). The corporate model of schooling: How high-stakes testing dehumanizes education. Counterparts, 451, 78–95.
57.
MyersC. B.MyersS. M. (2007). Assessing assessment: The effects of two exam formats on course achievement and evaluation. Innovative Higher Education, 31(4), 227–236.
PageD. (2015). The surveillance of teachers and the simulation of teachers. Journal of Education Policy, 32(1), 1–13.
61.
ParisD. C. (1998). Standards and charters: Horace Mann meets Tinker Bell. Educational Policy, 12(4), 380–396.
62.
ParkJ. J.BecksA. H. (2015). Who benefits from SAT prep? An examination of high school context and race/ethnicity. The Review of Higher Education, 39(1), 1–23.
63.
PearsonB. Z. (1993). Predictive validity of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) for Hispanic bilingual students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioural Sciences, 15(3), 342–356.
64.
Pennock-RomanM. (1990). Test validity and language background: A study of Hispanic American students at six universities. College Entrance Examination Board.
PulinxR.AvermaetP. V.AgirdagO. (2015). Silencing linguistic diversity: The extent, the determinants and consequences of the monolingual beliefs of Flemish students. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 542–556.
67.
RobertsonA. (2013). Connecting in crisis: “old” and “new” media and the Arab Spring. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 18(3), 325–341.
68.
RueckerT. (2013). High stakes testing and Latina/o students: Creating a hierarchy of college readiness. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 12(4), 303–320.
69.
SackettP. R.SchmittN.EllingsonJ. E.KabinM. B. (2001). High stakes testing in employment, credentialing, and higher education: Prospects in a post-affirmative action world. American Psychologist, 56, 302–303.
70.
SaenzT. I.HuerM. B. (2003). Testing strategies involving least biased language assessment of bilingual children. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 24(4), 184–193.
71.
ScheiberC. (2017). Does the KABC-II display ethnic bias in the prediction of reading, math and writing in elementary school through high school?Assessment, 24(6), 729–745.
72.
SchmittA. P. (1998). Language and cultural characteristics that explain differential item functioning for Hispanic examinees on the SAT. Journal of Education Measurement, 25(1), 1–13.
73.
SolerS. C. G. (2016). Educational achievement at schools: Assessing the effect of the civil conflict using a pseudo-panel of schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 91–106.
74.
SteeleC. M. (1998). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. In EberhardtJ. L.FiskeT. S. (Eds.), Confronting racism: The problem and the response (pp. 202–233). SAGE.
75.
SteeleC. M.AaronsonJ. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811.
76.
SteenselR. V.OostdamR.GelderenA. V.SchootenE. V. (2016). The role of word decoding, vocabulary knowledge and meta-cognitive knowledge in monolingual and bilingual low-achieving adolescents’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(3), 312–329.
77.
StevensonD.BakerD. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of Sociology, 97(6), 1639–1657.
78.
TomlinsonC. A.JarvisJ. M. (2014). Case studies of success: Supporting academic success for students with high potential from ethnic minority and economically disadvantaged backgrounds. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 37(3), 191–219.
79.
TraceyT. J.SedlacekW. E. (1987). A comparison of White and Black student academic success using noncognitive variables: A LISREL analysis. Research in Higher Education, 27(4), 333–348.
80.
VeneziaA.JaegerL. (2013). Transitions from high school to college. The Future of Children, 23(1), 117–136.
81.
WachsF. L.ChaseL. F. (2013). Explaining the failure of obesity intervention: Combining Bourdieu’s symbolic violence and Foucault’s microphysics of power to reconsider state interventions. Sociology of Sport Journal, 30(2), 111–131.
82.
WalshW. B.BetzN. (1995). Tests and assessment. Prentice Hall.
83.
WardropJ. L. (1976). Standardized testing in the schools: Uses and roles. Thomson Brooks/Cole.
WhiteC. D. L.JinL. (2011). Evaluation of speech and language assessment approaches with bilingual children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 46(6), 613–627.
86.
YamchiR.KumarV. (2016). Comparison of Iranian monolingual and bilingual EFL students’ listening comprehension in terms of watching English movie with Latinized Persian subtitles. English Language Teaching, 9(5), 65–76.
87.
ZwickR.SklarJ. C. (2005). Predicting college grades and degree completion using high school grades and SAT scores: The role of student ethnicity and first language. American Educational Research Journal, 42(3), 439–464.
