This ethnographic study of an urban Catholic high school examines its college culture, particular in regard to the Catholic School Advantage (CSA). We collected and critically analyzed multiple forms of data (archival, interviews, observations) at St. Peters High School (SPH) and its adjoining parish. We found a caring and holistic approach to teaching that is integral to the CSA. However, in regard to the college-going habitus, we found that neoliberal values had largely displaced earlier Catholic social values that related to the CSA. Thus, the college-going habitus was dominated by neoliberal economic values (including the worth of individual students and SPH) but largely silent about the social, academic, or spiritual values of students or institutions of higher education. We conclude that such a college-going habitus is likely not only to result in students’ high rate of college enrollment but also to jeopardize their ability to remain enrolled until they graduate.
AltonjiJ. G.ElderT. E.TaberC. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 151-184.
2.
AppleM. W. (1999). Power, meaning, and identity: Essays in critical educational studies (Vol. 109). Bern, Switzerland, Peter Lang.
3.
BakerD. P.RiordanC. (1998). The “eliting” of the common American Catholic school and the national education crisis. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(1), 16-23.
4.
BempechatJ.BoulayB. A.PiergrossS. C. (2008). Beyond the rhetoric: Understanding achievement and motivation in Catholic school students. Education and Urban Society, 40, 167-178.
5.
BloombergL. D.VolpeM. (2012). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A road map from beginning to end. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
6.
BourdieuP. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In KarabelJ.HalseyA. H. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 485-511). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
7.
BourdieuP. (1986a). Force of law: Toward sociology of the juridical field. Hastings Law Journal, 38, 805-853.
8.
BourdieuP. (1986b). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241-258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.
9.
BourdieuP.PasseronJ. C. (1977). Reproduction in society, education and culture (2nd ed.). London, England: SAGE.
10.
BraunH.JenkinsF.GriggW. (2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling (NCES 2006-461). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences.
11.
BriscoeF. M. (2009). “They make you invisible”: Negotiating power at the academic intersections of ethnicity, gender, and class. Equity & Excellence in Education, 42, 233-248.
12.
BriscoeF. M. (2012). Anarchist, neoliberal, & democratic decision-making: Deepening the joy in learning and teaching. Educational Studies, 48, 76-102.
13.
BriscoeF. M.De OliverM. (2012). School leaders’ discursive constructions of low-income and minority families identities: A marketplace racism/classism. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 9, 247-280.
14.
BriscoeF. M.KhalifaM. A. (2015). “That racism thing”: A critical race discourse analysis of a conflict over the proposed closure of a black high school. Race Ethnicity and Education, 18, 739-763.
15.
BrykA. S.LeeV. E.HollandP. B. (1995). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16.
BrykA. S.SchneiderB. (2002). Trust in schools: A core resource for improvement. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17.
CarbonaroW.CovayE. (2010). School sector and student achievement in the era of standards based reforms. Sociology of Education, 83, 160-182.
18.
CarusoF. M.CarusoM. J. (2012). When the sisters said farewell: The transition of leadership in Catholic elementary schools. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.
19.
ColemanJ.HofferT.KilgoreS. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools. Sociology of Education, 55, 65-76.
20.
CreswellJ. W. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
DonlevyJ. K. (2007). Ten dimensions of inclusion: Non-Catholic students in Catholic schools. Catholic Education, 10, 293-320.
22.
Du BoisW. E. B. (1903). The souls of Black Folk. New York, NY: Bantam Classic.
23.
DumaisS. A. (2002). Cultural capital, gender, and school success: The role of habitus. Sociology of Education, 75, 44-68.
24.
ElliottA. (2009). Contemporary social theory an introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
EllisonB.HallinanM. (2004). Ability grouping in Catholic and public schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 8, 107-129.
26.
EvansW. N.SchwabR. M. (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: Do Catholic schools make a difference?The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 941-974.
GirouxH. A. (2002). Neoliberalism, corporate culture, and the promise of higher education: The university as a democratic public sphere. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 425-464.
29.
GonzalesL. D.NúñezA.-M. (2014). Ranking regimes and the production of knowledge in academia:(Re) shaping faculty work?Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 31.
GraceG. (2003). “First and foremost the church offers Its educational service to the poor”: Class, inequality and Catholic schooling in contemporary contexts. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 13(1), 35-54.
32.
GreeleyA. M. (1982). Catholic high schools and minority students. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
33.
HallinanM. T. (2008). Teacher influences on students’ attachment to school. Sociology of Education, 81, 271-283.
34.
HassE. (2008). Propaganda. In GabbardD. (Ed.), Knowledge & power in the global economy: The effects of school reform in a neoliberal/conservative age (2nd ed.). (pp. 141-149). New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.
35.
hooksb. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London, England: Routledge.
36.
HuntT. C.JosephE. A.NuzziR. J. (2002). Catholic schools still make a difference: Ten years of research, 1991-2000. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
37.
KeithT. Z.PageE. B. (1985). Do Catholic high schools improve minority student achievement?American Educational Research Journal, 22, 337-349.
38.
KuhG. D.CruceT. M.ShoupR.KinzieJ.GonyeaR. M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. The Journal of Higher Education, 79, 540-563.
39.
LeeV. E.CroningerR. G.SmithJ. B. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in US secondary schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 99-121.
40.
LipmanP. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the rights to the city. New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
LouieV.HoldawayJ. (2009). Catholic schools and immigrant students: A new generation. The Teachers College Record, 111, 783-816.
42.
MadisonD. S. (2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
43.
McClaffertyK. A.McDonoughP. M.NúñezA.-M. (2002, April). What is a college culture? Facilitating college preparation through organizational change. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
44.
McDonoughP. M. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. The Journal of Higher Education, 65, 427-446.
45.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.
46.
McDonoughP. M.NúñezA.-M. (2007). Bourdieu’s sociology of education: Identifying persistent inequality, unmasking domination, and fighting social reproduction. In TorresC. A.TeodoroA. (Eds.), Critique and utopia: New developments in the sociology of education in the twenty-first century (pp. 139-154). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
47.
NúñezA.-M.KimD. (2012). Building a multicontextual model of Latino college enrollment: Student, school, and state-level effects. The Review of Higher Education, 35, 237-263.
48.
NunezE. A. (1985). Liberation theology (SywulkaPaul E. Trans.). Chicago, IL: Moody Press.
49.
PernaL. W. (2006). Understanding the relationship between information about college prices and financial aid and students’ college-related behaviors. American Behavioral Scientist, 49, 1620-1635.
50.
PeterkinD. L. (2010). “Within these walls”: Reading and writing institutional histotires. In GasmanM. (Ed.), The history of U.S. higher education: Methods for understanding the past. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
PoliteV. C. (1992). Getting the job done well: African American students and Catholic schools. The Journal of Negro Education, 61, 211-222.
52.
RodriguezP. J. (2013). Extending theories of college access: A critical ethnography on the organizational habitus at an urban Catholic high school (Doctor of Education, The University of Texas at San Antonio).
53.
SaenzV. B.HurtadoS.BarreraD.WolfD.YeungF. (2007). First in my family: A profile of first-generation college students at four-year institutions since 1971 (Report from the Higher Education Research Institute and the Foundation for Independent Higher Education, Cooperative Institutional Research Program). Los Angeles: The University of California, Los Angeles.
54.
SpringJ. H. (2008). The American school: From the puritans to no child left behind. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
VeneziaA.KirstM. W. (2005). Inequitable opportunities: How current education systems and policies undermine the chances for student persistence and success in college. Educational Policy, 19, 283-307.
57.
WalchT. (2012). “An honest response to serious losses”: Recent initiatives in American Catholic Education. American Catholic Studies, 123(3), 53-67.
58.
WeberM.ParsonsT. (1998). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York, NY: Roxbury.
