This study addresses the segregation of English language learner (ELL) students in schools across Texas. We descriptively analyze levels of racial, economic, and linguistic isolation experienced by ELL students across the state of Texas. We also examine the association between segregation by race/ethnicity, economic disadvantage, and language proficiency with high-stakes accountability ratings. Despite nearly two decades of accountability policies that have promised equality, our statistical analyses show that a majority of ELL students in Texas still attend high-poverty and high-minority schools, and we find that segregation by socioeconomic status (SES) and race and ethnicity is highly significant for predicting whether schools will be low performing relative to high performing.
BatalovaJ.McHughM. (2010). Number and growth of students in US schools in need of English instruction. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
3.
Cisneros v. Corpus Christi ISD, 324 F. Supp. 599 (U.S. Dist. 1970).
4.
Delgado et al. v. Bastrop Independent School District, Civil No. 388 (W.D. Tex, 1948).
5.
FryR. (2009). The rapid growth and changing complexion of suburban public schools. Washington, DC: The Pew Hispanic Center.
6.
FreyW. (2011). Melting pot cities and suburbs: Racial and ethnic change in metro America in the 2000s. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
7.
GandaraP.ContrerasF. (2009). The Latino education crisis: The consequences of failed social policies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
GandaraP.RumbergerR. (2009). Immigration, language, and education: How does language policy structure opportunity?Teachers College Record, 111, 750-782.
9.
GiffordB.ValdesG. (2006). The linguistic isolation of Hispanic students in California’s public schools: The challenge of reintegration. Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, 105(2), 125-154.
10.
GonzalesG. (1990). Chicano education in the era of segregation. Philadelphia, PA: The Balch Institute Press.
11.
IcelandJ.ScopollitiM. (2008). Immigrant residential segregation in U.S. Metropolitan areas, 1990-2000. Demography, 45, 79-94.
12.
Independent School District et al. v. Salvatierra et al., 33 S.W. 2d 790 (Tex. App. 1930).
13.
Keyes v. School Dist. No. 1, 413 U.S. 189 (U.S. S.Ct. 1973).
14.
GandaraP.OrfieldG. (2010). A return to the “Mexican room”: The segregation of Arizona’s English learners. Los Angeles: UCLA Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
15.
MicklesonR. A. (2001). Subverting Swann: First- and second-generation segregation in the Charlotte-Mecklenberg schools. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 215-252.
16.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010, July). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic groups. Washington, DC: Author.
17.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). The condition of education 2011. Washington, DC: Author.
18.
OrfieldG. (2009). Reviving the goal of an integrated society: A 21st century challenge. Los Angeles: UCLA Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
19.
ReardonS.YunJ. T. (2001). Suburban racial change and suburban school segregation, 1987-1995. Sociology of Education, 74(2), 79-101.
20.
SalinasG. (1971). Mexican-Americans and the desegregation of schools in the Southwest. Riverside: University of California at Riverside, Western Regional School Desegregation Projects.
21.
Suarez-OrozcoC.Suarez-OrozcoM.TodorvaI. (2008). Learning in a New Land. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22.
TeferaA.FrankenbergE.Siegel-HawleyG.ChirichingoG. (2011). Integrating suburban schools: How to benefit from growing diversity and avoid segregation. Los Angeles: UCLA Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles.
Vasquez HeiligJ. (2011a, December9). What and why: Secondary education and ELLs in an environment of Texas-style accountability (Keynote Speaker, Lecture conducted from Washington, DC). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of English Language Acquisition.
Vasquez HeiligJ.DietzL.VolonninoM. (2011). From Jim Crow to the top 10% plan: A historical analysis of Latina/o access to a selective flagship university. Enrollment Management Journal: Student Access, Finance, and Success in Higher Education, 5, 83-109.
31.
Vasquez HeiligJ.RodriguezC.SomersP. (2011). Immigrant DREAMs: The Texas 10% admissions plan, ELL student college choice and academic success. Journal of Latinos and Education, 10(2), 106-126.
