Research has found strong linkages between adolescent substance use and attitudes toward school. Few studies of this relationship, however, consider the different dimensions of students’ school attitudes, separating perceptions of the importance of school from the quality of students’ affective experiences therein. Using a sample of 301 urban adolescents, evenly divided into substance users and nonusers, this study examines the relationships between these two dimensions of school attitudes and substance use. Findings highlight a subset of adolescent substance users who see school as the most important place in which they routinely spend time and who differ significantly from other users, but not from nonusers, in their expressed satisfaction with school. Results also call attention to the ubiquity of urban adolescents’ dissatisfaction with their teachers, showing such dissatisfaction as unrelated to their rates of substance use. Implications for school reform, dropout prevention programs, and future research are discussed.
BridgelandJ. M.DilulioJ. J.MorisonK. B. (2006). The silent epidemic: Perspectives of high school dropouts. Seattle, WA: The Gates Foundation.
2.
BronfenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
3.
BryantA. L.SchulenbergJ.BachmanJ. G.O’MalleyP. M.JohnstonL. D. (2000). Understanding the links among school misbehavior, academic achievement and cigarette use during adolescence: A national panel study of adolescents. Prevention Science, 1, 71-87.
4.
BryantA. L.ZimmermanM. A. (2002). Examining the effects of academic beliefs and behaviors on changes in substance use among urban adolescents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 621-637.
5.
BryantA. L.ZimmermanM. A. (2003). Role models and psychosocial outcomes among African American adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 18, 36-67.
6.
EcclesJ. S.LordS.RoeserR. W.BarberB. L.JozefowiczD. M. H. (1997). The association of school transitions in early adolescence with developmental trajectories through high school. In SchulenbergJ.MaggsJ. L.HurrelmannK. (Eds.), Health risks and developmental transitions during adolescence (pp. 283-320). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks & burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
8.
EllicksonP.BuiK.BellR.McGuiganK. A. (1998). Does early drug use increase the risk of dropping out of high school?Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 357.
9.
FallisR.OpotowS. (2003). Are students failing school or are schools failing students? Class cutting in high school. Journal of Social Issues, 59, 103-119.
10.
GarnierH. E.SteinJ. A.JacobsJ. K. (1997). The process of dropping out of high school: A 19-year perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 395-419.
11.
HawkinsJ. D.CatalanoR. E.MillerJ. Y. (1992). Risk and protective factors for alcohol and other drug problems in adolescence and early adulthood: Implications for substance abuse prevention. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 64-105.
12.
HawkinsJ. D.GuoJ.HillK. G.Battin-PearsonS.AbbottR. D. (2001). Long-term effects of the Seattle social development intervention on school bonding trajectories. Applied Developmental Science, 5, 225-236.
13.
HubermanA. M.MilesM. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-444). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
LutharS. S.CushingG. (1997). Substance use and personal adjustment among disadvantaged teenagers: A prospective study. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 353-372.
15.
MacLeodJ. (1995). Ain’t no makin’ it: Aspirations and attainment in a low-income neighborhood. Boulder, CO: Westview.
16.
MasonM.CheungI.WalkerL. (2004). Substance use, social networks and the geography of urban adolescents. Substance Use and Misuse, 9(10-12), 1751-1778.
17.
MasonM.ValenteT.CoatsworthJ. D.MennisJ.LawrenceF.ZelenakP. (2010). Place-based social network quality and correlates of substance use among urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 33, 419-427.
18.
McCluskeyC. P.KrohnM. D.LizotteA. J.RodriguezM. L. (2002). Early substance use and school achievement: An examination of Latino, White and African American youth. Journal of Drug Issues, 32, 921-944.
19.
MobergD. P.HahnL. (1991). The adolescent drug involvement scale. Journal of Adolescent Chemical Dependency, 2, 75-88.
20.
National Research Council. (2003). Engaging schools: Fostering high school students’ motivation to learn. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
21.
PrinsA.OuimetteP.KimerlingR.CamerondR. P.HugelshoferD. S.Shaw-HegwerJ.. . .SheikhJ. I. (2004). The Primary Care PTSD screen (PC-PTSD): Development and operating characteristics. Primary Care Psychiatry, 9(1), 9-14.
22.
RegisterC. A.WilliamsD. R.GrimesP. W. (2001). Adolescent drug use and educational attainment. Education Economics, 9, 1-18.
23.
ReynoldsC.KamphausR. (2004). Behavior Assessment System for Children (2nd ed.). Bloomington, IN: Pearson Assessments.
24.
RoeserR. W.EcclesJ. S.Freedman-DoanC. (1999). Academic functioning and mental health in adolescence: Patterns, progressions, routes from childhood. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 135-174.
25.
SwansonC. (2004). Who graduates? Who doesn’t? A statistical portrait of public high school graduation. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.
26.
TownsendL.FisherA. J.KingG. (2007). A systematic review of the relationship between high school dropout and substance use. Clinical Child and Family Psychology, 10, 295-317.
27.
VermaS.SaraswathiT. S. (1992). At the crossroads: Time use by university students. New Delhi, India: International Development Research Center.
28.
VoelklK. E.FroneM. R. (2000). Predictors of substance use at school among high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 583-592.
29.
WilliamsJ. H.DavisL. E.JohnsonS. D.WilliamsT. R.SaundersJ. A.NebbittV. E. (2007). Substance use and academic performance among African-American high school students. Social Work Research, 31, 151-161.
30.
WillmsJ. D. (2003). Student engagement at school: A sense of belonging and participation. Results from PISA 2000. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.
31.
WintersK. C.BotzetM. A.AndersonN.BellehumeurT.EganB. (2001). Screening and assessment study: Wisconsin division of juvenile corrections, alcohol & other drug abuse. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Adolescent Substance Abuse Research.
32.
Youth Risk Behavior Survey: 2009. [Data file]. Atlanta, GA: Center for Disease Control and Prevention. Available from CDC Web site, http://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/
33.
ZenkovK.DutroE. (Eds.). (2009). Urban students’ perspectives on school, teachers, pedagogy and curriculum. Theory into Practice, 48, 165-168.
34.
ZimmermanM. A.Schmeelk-ConeK. H. (2003). A longitudinal analysis of adolescent substance use and school motivation among African American youth. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 185-210.
