In this article the authors examine the reasons for the establishment of Hindu schools in the Netherlands and how the Dutch system of education facilitates these and other voluntarily separate schools. In particular, the authors explore the manner in which Hindu schools aim to cultivate and sustain attachments to their own group through a culturally specific approach to learning and belonging that promises greater educational equality. The authors argue that the special features of Dutch Hindu schools, as a form of voluntary separation, may better facilitate and promote equality of educational opportunity than other options available to the Dutch Hindu community.
BloembergL.NijhuisD. (1993). Hindoescholen [Hindu schools in the Netherlands] in Nederland. Migrantenstudies, 9, 35-52.
2.
BloklandT.Van EijkG. (2010). Do people who like diversity practice diversity in neighborhood life? Neighborhood use and the social networks of “diversity seekers” in a mixed neighbourhood in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36, 313-332.
3.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2003). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in the United States. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
CrulM.HoldawayJ. (2009). Children of immigrants in schools in New York and Amsterdam: The factors shaping attainment. Teachers College Record, 111, 1476-1507.
8.
DagevosJ.GijsbertsM. (2007). Integration report 2007. Summary. In DagevosJ.GijsbertsM. (Eds.), Jaarraport integratie (pp. 311-326). The Hague, Netherlands: SCP.
9.
DriessenG. (2007). “Peer group” “Peer group” effects on educational achievement. An international review of effects, explanations and theoretical and methodological considerations. Nijmegen, Netherlands: ITS.
10.
DriessenG.MerryM. (2006). Islamic schools in the Netherlands: Expansion or marginalization?Interchange, 37, 201-223.
11.
FordhamS.OgbuJ. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the burdens of “acting white.”Urban Review, 18, 176-206.
12.
KarstenS.FelixC.LedouxG.MeijnenW.RoeleveldJ.Van SchootenE. (2006). Choosing segregation or integration? The extent and effects of ethnic segregation in Dutch cities. Education and Urban Society, 38, 228-247.
13.
KoefoedG.JadoenandansingS. (1993). Surinamese languages. In ExtraG.VerhoevenL. (Eds.), Community languages in the Netherlands (pp. 51-67). Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
14.
KurienP. (2001). Religion, ethnicity and politics: Hindu and Muslim Indian immigrants in the United States. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 24, 263-293.
15.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African-American children (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16.
MerryM. (2012). Equality, self respect and voluntary separation. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 15, 79-100.
17.
MoodyJ. (2001). Race, school integration and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 679-716.
18.
MusterdS.OstendorfW. (2009). Residential segregation and integration in the Netherlands. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 1515-1532.
19.
NewmannF.RutterR.SmithM. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221-238.
20.
NiemantsverdrietL. (2009). Een zwarte school die hoog scoort [A Black school that scores high]Didaktief, 9, 32-33.
21.
PerezM.SociasM. (2008). Highly successful schools: What do they do differently and at what cost?Education Finance and Policy, 3, 109-129.
Roelsma-SomerS. (2008). De kwaliteit van hindoescholen. [The quality of Hindu schools]. Doctoral dissertation, University of Tilburg, 2008.
24.
TatumB. (1997). Why are all of the black kids sitting together in the cafeteria? And other conversations about race. New York: Basic Books.
25.
TeunissenJ. (1990). Basisscholen op islamitische en hindoeïstische grondslag. [Islamic and Hindu schools]. Migrantenstudies, 6, 45-57.
26.
TimarT.RozaM. (2010). “A false dilemma”: Should decisions about education resource use be made at the state or local level?American Journal of Education, 116, 397-422.
27.
Van AmersfoortH.Van NiekerkM. (2006). Immigration as a colonial inheritance: Post-colonial immigrants in the Netherlands, 1945-2002. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 32, 323-346.
28.
Van NiekerkM. (2000). Paradoxes in paradise. Integration and social mobility of the Surinamese in the Netherlands. In VermeulenH.PenninxR. (Eds.), Immigrant integration. The Dutch case (pp. 64-92). Amsterdam: Het Spinhuis.
29.
Van NiekerkM. (2004). Afro-Caribbeans and Indo-Caribbeans in the Netherlands: Premigration legacies and social mobility. International Migration Review, 38, 158-183.
30.
Van NiekerkM. (2007). Second-generation Caribbeans in the Netherlands: Different migration histories, diverging trajectories. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33, 1063-1081.
31.
VedderP. (2006). Black and white schools in the Netherlands. European Education, 38, 36-49.
32.
VertovecS. (1995). Indian indentured migration to the Caribbean. In The Cambridge Survey of World Migration (pp. 57-62). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
33.
VillalpandoO. (2003). Self-segregation or self-preservation? A critical race theory and Latina/o critical theory analysis of a study of Chicana/o college students. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 16, 619-646.
34.
WilliamsT.KirstM.HaertelE.. (2005). Similar students, different results: Why do some schools do better?Mountain View, CA: EdSource.
