There are few instances in the literature on urban school reform that have closely studied specific school buildings to describe the grant resource appropriation process. This study attempts to fill that gap by developing case studies of two middle schools with divergent profiles in resource utilization through micro-ethnographies. One school exhibited optimal engagement with opportunities made available through a large federally funded grant, whereas the second school failed to do the same through this initiative. We investigated how the unique features of these schools and key individuals within them intersected with the structure of the grant program to shape the nature of school engagement. These two case study narratives illuminate the range of factors that might be implicated in the implementation of school reform initiatives, particularly in urban settings.
Bateson, M.C. (February 9, 2004). Women’s breakfast. Guest speaker at the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education, Committee on Women’s issues, Chicago.
2.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. ( 2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Brown, C.A. ( 2007). Are America’s poorest children receiving their share of federal education funds? School-level Title 1 funding in New York, Los Angeles and Chicago?Journal of Education Finance, 33(2), 140-146.
4.
Bruner, J. ( 1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Bruner, J. ( 1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Bruno, J.E. ( 2000). Teacher orientation and management of the urban school reform and change process. Urban Education35, 141-164.
7.
Cobb, P., McClain, K., & Lamberg, T. ( 2003). Situating teachers’ instructional practices in the institutional setting of the school and district. Educational Researcher, 32(6), 13-24.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L. ( 2000). New standards and old inequities: School reform and the education of AfricanAmerican students. Journal of Negro Education69, 263-287.
9.
East-West Gateway Council of Governments. ( 2006). Where we stand: The strategic assessment of the St. Louis region. (5th ed.). Retrieved July 26, 2010, from http://www.ewgateway.org/pdffiles/library/wws/wws06.pdf
10.
Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C. (2001). Analyzing cultural models and settings to connect minority achievement and school improvement research . Educational Psychologist, 36(1), 45-56.
11.
Gutierrez, C., Field, S., Basile, C.G., & Simmons, J. ( 2007). Principals as knowledge managers: Helping principals in Professional Development Schools intentionally utilize the resources of partnership. School-University Partnerships1(2), 42-54.
12.
Heaney, G.W., & Uchitelle, S. ( 2004). Unending struggle: The long road to an equal education in St. Louis. St. Louis, MO: Reedy Press.
13.
Holmes Group. (1990). Tomorrow’s schools: Principles for the design of professional development schools. East Lansing, MI: Author.
14.
Holmes Group. (1995). The Holmes Trilogy: Tomorrow’s teachers, tomorrow’s schools, and tomorrow’s schools of education. East Lansing, MI: Author.
15.
Holmes Partnership. (2006). The Holmes partnership trilogy: Tomorrow’s teachers, tomorrow’s schools, tomorrow’s schools of Education . New York: Peter Lang.
16.
Johnston, B. ( 2002). Absent from school: Educational policy and comprehensive reform. Urban Review, 34, 205-251.
17.
Lieberman, A. ( 1995). The work of restructuring schools: Building from the ground up. New York: Teachers College Press
18.
Maxwell, J.A. ( 1996). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
19.
Miron, L., & Edward, J. (Eds.). (2003). Reinterpreting urban school reform: Have urban schools failed, or has the reform movement failed urban schools? (ERIC report ED477788).
20.
Morris, V.G., & Sterbinsky, A. (2006). Retaining highly effective teachers in an urban school district. In K. Howey, L. Post, & N. Zimpher (Eds.), Recruiting, preparing and retaining teachers for urban schools (pp.167-188). Washington, DC: AACTE.
21.
National Assessment of Educational Progress (2005-2006). Retrieved October 11, 2007, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/stateprofiles/sresult.asp?mode=short&s1=29
22.
Navarro, V. ( 2005). Context matters: Situated assessment practices in urban teaching. In F. Peterman (Ed.). Designing performance assessment systems for urban teacher preparation (pp. 173-190). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum
23.
Navarro, V., Ingram, J., & Teferi, M. ( 2007, January). Sustaining urban partnerships: Overcoming revolving door leadership syndrome. Paper presented at the national meeting of The Holmes Partnership, San Antonio, TX.
24.
Odden, A.R., & Archibald, S.J. (2001). Reallocating resources: How to boost student achievement without asking for more. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
25.
Peterman, F. (Ed.). (2005). Designing performance assessment systems for urban teacher preparation. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
26.
Polkinghorne, D.E. ( 1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany: State University of New York Press.
27.
Sabourin, S. ( 1992). Another foundation goes to school: The Panasonic Foundation’s school restructuring program. Teachers College Record, 93, 463-471.
28.
Schmitz, C., Baber, S., John, D., & Brown, K.S. ( 2000, November). Creating the 21st century school of education: Collaboration, community and partnership in St. Louis [Special Issue]. Peabody Journal of Education, 75(3), 64-84. Retrieved July 26, 2010 from http://www.leaonline.com
29.
Shakeshaft, C., Sarason, S.B., & Shaker, P. ( 2004). Big change question What is needed to resolve the social and critical issues affecting large scale reform? Macro change demands micro involvement. Journal of educational Change, 5, 289-302
30.
Stake, R.E. ( 1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
31.
Steinberg, S.R., & Kincheloe, J.L. (2004). 19 urban questions: Teaching in the city. New York; Peter Lang
32.
Thurman, A., & Lanier, J. ( 2007). The Holmes partnership trilogy. New York: Peter Lang.
33.
Tyack, D., & Cuban, L. ( 1995). Tinkering towards Utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34.
Warren, S., & Higbee, B.B. ( 2007). Principals’ perceptions of educational change; Critical external agent support to K-12 schools. Journal of Urban Learning, Teaching, and Research, 3, 111-119.
