The purpose of this study was to examine general physical education (GPE) teachers’ beliefs about teaching differently abled students in inclusive classes.The participants were 5 GPE teachers from a large urban school district. The research method was explanatory multiple-case study situated in planned behavior theory. Data were gathered using a demographic questionnaire, attitude survey, and interviews. Survey data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and revealed that the teachers’ judgments vary on inclusion and their level of acceptance in teaching differently abled students. The teachers agreed that more professional training was a need. Interview data were analyzed with constant comparative method.The emergent themes were: (a) teachers’ pedagogies troubled, (b) dependent self-efficacy, (c) paradoxes, (d) motives, and (e) concerns. Findings thus implied that urban school districts should regularly engage teachers in professional development focused on teaching differently abled students.
Ajzen, I. ( 1985). From intentions to action: A theory of planned behavior . In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action-control from cognition to behavior (pp. 11-19). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
2.
Ajzen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179-211.
3.
Ajzen, I. ( 2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32, 1-20.
4.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. ( 2000). Attitudes and the attitude-behavior relation: Reasoned and automatic processes. In W. Stroebe & M. Hewstone (Eds.), European review of social psychology (pp. 1-33). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
Akuffo, P.B., & Hodge, S.R. ( 2008). Roles and responsibilities of adapted physical education teachers in an urban school district. Education and Urban Society, 40, 243-268.
6.
Ammah, J.O.A., & Hodge, S.R. ( 2005). Secondary physical education teachers’ beliefs and practices in teaching students with severe disabilities: A descriptive analysis. High School Journal, 89, 40-54.
7.
Bechtel, P.A., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Chapter 2: Effective professional development- What we now know. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 363-378.
8.
Brantlinger, E., Jimenez, R., Klingner, J., Pugach, M., & Richardson, V. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 195-207.
9.
City of Columbus. (2006). Columbus population profile: 1990-2000. Retrieved November 28, 2006, from http://development.columbus.gov/Bizdevelopment/Demographics/Columbus/index.asp
10.
Columbus Public School District (CPS). (2006 ). Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://www.columbus.k12.oh.us
11.
DePauw, K.P., & Doll-Tepper, G. (2000). Toward progressive inclusion and acceptance: Myth or reality? The inclusion debate and bandwagon discourse . Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 135-143.
12.
Goodwin, D.L., Fitzpatrick, D.A., Thurmeier, R., & Hall, C. ( 2006). The decision to join Special Olympics: Parents’ perspectives. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23, 163-183.
13.
Goodwin D.L., & Watkinson, E.J. (2000). Inclusive physical education from the perspective of students with physical disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 17, 144-160.
14.
Grenier, M. ( 2006). A social constructionist perspective of teaching and learning in inclusive physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 23, 245-260.
15.
Hodge, S.R., & Akuffo, P.B. ( 2007). Adapted physical education teachers’ concerns in teaching students with disabilities in an urban public school district. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 54, 399-416.
16.
Hodge, S.R., Ammah, J.O.A., Casebolt, K., LaMaster, K., & O’Sullivan, M. (2004). High school general physical education teachers’ behaviors and beliefs associated with inclusion . Sport, Education and Society. Society, 9, 395-419.
17.
Hodge, S.R., Davis, R., Woodard, R., & Sherrill, C. ( 2002). Comparison of practicum types in changing preservice teachers’ attitudes and perceived competence. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 155-171.
18.
Hodge, S.R., & Jansma, P. ( 1999). Effects of contact time and location of practicum experiences on attitudes of physical education majors. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 16, 48-63.
19.
Hodge, S.R., Kozub, F.M., Robinson, L.E., & Hersman, B.L. ( 2007). Reporting gender, race, ethnicity, and sociometric status: Guidelines for research and professional practice. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 24, 21-37.
20.
Hodge, S.R., Murata, N.M., & Kozub, F. ( 2002). Physical educators’ judgments about inclusion: A new instrument for pre-service teachers. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 435-452.
21.
Hodge, S.R., Tannehill, D., & Kluge, M.A. ( 2003). Exploring the meaning of practicum experiences for PETE students. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 20, 381-399.
22.
Hutzler, Y., Fliess, O., Chacham, A., & Van den Auweele, Y. (2002). Perspectives of children with physical disabilities on inclusion and empowerment: Supporting and limiting factors. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 300-317.
23.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act (IDEIA) of 2004, Pub. L. No. 108-446, Sec. 602, 118 Stat. 2657.
24.
Kowalski, E.M. ( 1995). The infusion approach to teacher development. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 66, 49-54.
25.
LaMaster, K., Gall, K., Kinchin, G., & Siedentop, D. ( 1998). Inclusion practice of effective elementary physical education specialists. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 15, 64-81.
26.
Leininger, M. ( 1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.), Critical issues in qualitative research methods (pp. 95-115). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
27.
Lieberman, L.J., Houston-Wilson, C., & Kozub, F.M. ( 2002). Perceived barriers to including students with visual impairments in general physical education. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 19, 364-377.
28.
Lienert, C., Sherrill, C., & Myers, B. ( 2001). Physical educator’s beliefs about integrating children with disabilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 1-17.
29.
Marín, G., & Marín, B.V. (1991). Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
30.
Merriam, S.B. ( 1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education . San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass .
31.
MINITAB Statistical Software. (2000). MINITAB Release 13 for windows. State College, PA: Minitab.
32.
Obrusníková, I., Válková, H., & Block, M. ( 2003). Impact of inclusion in general physical education on students without disabilities. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly , 20, 230-245.
33.
O’Sullivan, M., & Deglau, D. ( 2006). Chapter 7: Principles of professional development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 441-449.
34.
Patton, M.Q. ( 1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
35.
Place, K., & Hodge, S.R. ( 2001). Social inclusion of students with physical disabilities in general physical education: A behavioral analysis. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 18, 389-404.
36.
Rizzo, T.L., & Kirkendall, D.R. (1995). Teaching students with mild disabilities: What affects attitudes of future physical educators? Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 205-216.
37.
Sato, T., Hodge, S.R., Murata, N.M., & Maeda, J.K. ( 2007). Japanese physical education teachers’ beliefs about teaching students with disabilities. Sport, Education and Society, 12, 211-230.
38.
Suomi, J., Collier, D., & Brown, L. ( 2003). Factors affecting the social experiences of students in elementary physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 22, 186-202.
39.
Theodorakis, Y., Bagiatis, K., & Goudas, M. ( 1995). Attitudes toward teaching individuals with disabilities: Application of planned behavior theory. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 12, 151-160.
40.
Thomas, J.R., & Nelson, J.K. ( 2001). Research methods in physical activity (4th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
41.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services, Office of Special Education Programs ( 2006). 26th Annual (2004) Report to Congress on the implementation of the individuals with disabilities education act, 2. Washington, DC: Author.
42.
Ward, P., & O’Sullivan, M. (2006). Chapter 1: The contexts of urban settings. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education , 25, 348-362.
43.
Yin, R.K. ( 2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
