This case study examines St. Malachy, an urban Catholic elementary school primarily serving children traditionally marginalized by race, class, linguistic heritage, and disability. As a private school, St. Malachy serves the public good by recruiting and retaining such traditionally marginalized students. As empirical studies involving Catholic schools frequently juxtapose them with public schools, the author presents this examination from a different tack. Neither vilifying nor glorifying Catholic schooling, this study critically examines the pursuit of social justice in this school context. Data gathered through a 1-year study show that formal and informal leaders in St. Malachy adapted their governance, aggressively sought community resources, and focused their professional development to build the capacity to serve their increasingly pluralistic student population. The analysis confirms the deepening realization that striving toward social justice is a messy, contradictory, and complicated pursuit, and that schools in both public and private sectors are allies in this pursuit.
Alt, M.N., & Peter, K. ( 2002). Private schools: A brief portrait. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
2.
Baker, D., & Riordan, C. ( 1998). The "eliting" of the common American Catholic school and the national education crisis. Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 16-23.
3.
Baker, D., & Riordan, C. ( 1999). It’s not about the failure of Catholic schools . Phi Delta Kappan, 80, 462-463.
4.
Barton, J. ( 2000). "To include or not to include?" That is not the question . Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 3, 329-341.
5.
Berliner, D. ( 2005). Our impoverished view of educational reform. Teachers College Record, 108, 949-995.
6.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S.K. ( 1992). Qualitative research for education (2nd. ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon .
7.
Brachear, M., & Ramirez, M. ( 2005, February 25). Latino, black parishes hit hardest by decision . Chicago Tribune.
8.
Brennan, L., Callahan, L., & Haney, R. ( 1999). The board’s role in financing and resourcing Catholic schools. In R. Haney & J. O’Keefe (Eds.), Creatively financing and resourcing Catholic schools (pp. 115-125). Washington, DC : National Catholic Educational Association.
9.
Broughman, S., & Swaim, N. ( 2006). Characteristics of private schools in the United States: Results from the 2003-2004 Private School Universe Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics .
10.
Bryk, A., Lee, V., & Holland, P. ( 1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
11.
Byron, W. ( 1999). Framing the principles of Catholic social thought. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 3, 7-14.
12.
Carger, C.L. ( 1996). Of borders and dreams: A Mexican-American experience of urban education. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Cattaro, G.M. ( 2002). Catholic schools: Enduring presence in urban America . Education and Urban Society, 35, 100-110.
14.
Cibulka, J., O’Brien, T., & Zewe, D. ( 1982). Inner-city private elementary schools: A study. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
15.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. ( 1982). High school achievement: Public, Catholic, and private compared. New York: Basic Books .
16.
Convey, J. ( 1992). Catholic schools make a difference: Twenty-five years of research. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
17.
Curran, C. ( 2002). Catholic social teaching: A historical, theological, and ethical analysis. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
18.
Discipline with Purpose. (2007). Discipline with purpose. Retrieved December 8, 2007, from www.selfdisciplinedwp.com
19.
Dwyer, J. ( 2005, February 13). Once mighty, Catholic schools find status is diminished. New York Times, p. 37.
20.
Ferri, B., & Connor, D. ( 2005). Tools of exclusion: Race, disability, and (re)segregated education. Teachers College Record, 107, 22.
21.
Freire, P. ( 1973). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Hagerstown, MN: Harper and Row. Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers. New York: Longman.
22.
Gray, M., & Gautier, M. ( 2006). Primary trends, challenges, and outlook: A report on U.S. Catholic elementary schools 2000-2005. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
23.
Haney, R., & O’Keefe, J. (1999). Creatively financing and resourcing Catholic schools. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
24.
Harris, J.C. ( 2000). The funding dilemma facing Catholic elementary and secondary schools. In J. Youniss & J. Convey (Eds.), Catholic schools at the crossroads: Survival and transformation (p. 55). New York: Teachers College Press.
25.
Hoffer, T., Greeley, A., & Coleman, J. ( 1985). Achievement growth in public and Catholic schools. Sociology of Education, 58, 74-97.
26.
Hunt, T. ( 2000). The history of Catholic schools in the United States: An overview. In T. Hunt, T. Oldenski & T. Wallace (Eds.), Catholic school leadership: An invitation to lead (p. 34). New York: Falmer.
27.
Hunt, T., Bauch, P., Cattaro, G.M., Smith, K., Nuzzi, R., & Casino, S. ( 2006). Catholic schools in the public interest: Past, present, and future. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of American Educational Research Association. April 7-11, San Francisco.
28.
Jepsen, C. ( 2003). The effectiveness of Catholic primary schooling. Journal of Human Resources, 38, 928-941.
29.
Jeynes, W. ( 2002). A meta-analysis of the effects of attending religious schools and religiousity on black and Hispanic academic achievement. Education and Urban Society, 35, 27-49.
30.
Jeynes, W. ( 2006). A meta-analysis: The effects of Catholic and Protestant schools. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. April 7-11, San Francisco.
31.
Kearney, M.E. ( 1996). Collegial planning in classroom discipline inthe elementary schools in the Archdiocese of Omaha. University of Nebraska-Lincoln . Retrieved January 1, 1996, from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/dissertations/AAI9628237
32.
Kulgelmass, J. ( 2004). The inclusive school: Sustaining equity and standards . New York: Teachers College Press .
33.
Kvale, S. ( 2001). The interview situation. In C. Conrad, J. G. Hawworth, & L. Lattuca (Eds.), Qualitative research in higher education: Expanding perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 155-172). Boston: Pearson Publishing.
34.
Lawrence-Brown, D., & Muschaweck, K. (2004). Getting started with collaborative teamwork for inclusion. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 8, 146-161.
35.
Long, T., Brown, C., & Nagy-Rado, A. ( 2007). Preparing special educators to assume collaborative and consultative roles. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 10, 409-507.
36.
Long, T., & Schuttloffel, M.J. (2006). A rationale for special education in Catholic schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 9, 443-452.
37.
Losen, D., & Welner, K. ( 2001). Disabling discrimination in our public schools: Comprehensive legal challenges to inappropriate and inadequate special education services for minority children. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 36, 407.
38.
Maxwell, J. ( 1998). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
39.
McGreevey, J. ( 2003). Catholicism and American freedom: A history. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
40.
McGreevy, J. ( 1996). Parish boundaries: The Catholic encounter with race in the twentieth-century urban north. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
O’Keefe, J. ( 1996). No margin, no mission. In T. McLaughlin, J. O’Keefe & B. O’Keefe (Eds.), The contemporary Catholic school: Context, identity, and diversity (p. 177). Washington, DC: Falmer.
43.
O’Keefe, J., Greene, J., Henderson, S., Connors, M., Goldschmidt, E., & Schervish, K. ( 2004). Sustaining the legacy: Inner-city Catholic Elementary Schools in the United States. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
44.
O’Keefe, J., & Murphy, J. ( 2000). Ethnically diverse Catholic schools: School structure, students, staffing, and finance. In J. Youniss & J. Convey (Eds.), Catholic schools at the crossroads: Survival and transformation (p. 117). New York: Teachers College Press.
45.
O’Shea, D., & O’Shea, L. (1998). Learning to include: Lessons learned from a high school without special education services. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 40-48.
46.
Orfield, G., & Lee, C. ( 2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, The Civil Rights Project.
47.
Owens, R.F. ( 2005). Urban revitalization: A case study of one Catholic elementary school’s journey. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 9, 58-74.
48.
Patton, M.Q. ( 1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park: SAGE .
49.
Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace. ( 2004). Compendium of the social doctrine of the Church. Vatican City: Libreria Editrice Vaticana.
50.
Powell, M. ( 2004). Catholic high schools: Can inclusion work without significant publicly-funded resources? Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 8, 86-106.
51.
Preimesberger, J. ( 2000). Historical perspective on the implementation of inclusive education in selected schools in the Diocese of San Diego. Unpublished dissertation , University of San Diego, San Diego .
52.
Riordan, C. ( 2000). Trends in student demography in Catholic secondary schools, 1972-1992. In J. Youniss & J. Convey (Eds.), Catholic schools at the crossroads: Survival and transformation (p. 33). New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
Roberts, P. ( 2000). Education, literacy, and humanization: Exploring the work of Paulo Freire. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.
54.
Sandor, W. ( 2001a). Catholic schools: Private and social effects. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
55.
Sandor, W. ( 2001b). The effects of Catholic schools on religiosity, education, and competition (Occasional Paper No. 32). New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College .
56.
Sapon-Shevin, M. ( 2007). Widening the circle: The power of inclusive classrooms . Boston: Beacon Press.
57.
Scanlan, M. ( 2006). Problematizing the pursuit of social justice education . UCEA Review,XLV(3), 6-8.
58.
Scanlan, M. ( 2008). Grammar of Catholic schooling and radically "catholic" schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice , 12(1), 25-54.
59.
Scanlan, M., & Zehrbach, G. (in press). Improving bilingual service delivery in Catholic schools through two-way immersionCatholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice.
60.
Shields, T. ( 2002, June 14). The Miguel School Movement. USA / Toronto.
61.
Snyder, T.D., Dillow, S., & Hoffman, C. ( 2007). Digest of educational statistics 2006 (NCES 2007-017) . Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics, Institute of Educational Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
62.
St. John, E. ( 1999). Integrating liberation theology into restructuring: Toward a model for urban Catholic schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 2, 265-280.
63.
Stake, R. ( 1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
64.
Stevens-Arroyo, A., & Pantoja, S. ( 2003). History and inculturation: the Latino experience of Catholic education. In J. Augenstein, C. Kauffman & R. Wister (Eds.), One hundred years of Catholic education. Washington, DC: National Catholic Education Association .
65.
Storz, M., & Nestor, K. ( 2007). They call us to justice: Responding to the call of the Church and our students. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
66.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. ( 1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
67.
Strizek, G., Pittsonberger, J., Riordan, K., Lyter, D.M., & Orlofsky, G. ( 2007). Characteristics of schools, districts, teachers , principals, and school libraries in the United States:2003-2004 Schools and stafing survey (NCES 2006-313 Revised). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
68.
Tanner, L.N. ( 1978). Classroom discipline for effective teaching and learning . New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
69.
Theoharis, G. ( 2007). Social justice educational leaders and resistance: Toward a theory of social justice leadershipEducational Administration Quarterly, 43, 221-258.
70.
Toma, J.D. ( 2006). Approaching rigor in applied qualitative research. In C. Conrad & R. Serlin (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook for research in education: Engaging ideas and enriching inquiry (pp. 405-423). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
71.
United States Census Bureau. (2009). Current Population Survey. Retrieved July 21, 2009, from http://www.census.gov/hhes/www./macro/032008/pov/new01_100.htm
72.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. ( 1998). Summary Report of the task force on Catholic social teaching and Catholic education. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.
73.
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. ( 2002a). Catholic school children with disabilities (Statement) . Washington, DC: United States Conference of Catholic Bishops.
74.
Vitullo-Martin, T. ( 1979). Catholic inner-city schools: The future. Washington, DC: United States Catholic Conference.
75.
Yin, R. ( 2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
76.
York, D. ( 1996). The academic achievement of African Americans in Catholic schools: A review of the literature. In J. J. Irvine & M. Foster (Eds.), Growing up African American in Catholic schools (pp. 11-46). New York: Teachers College Press.
77.
Youniss, J., & McLellan, J. ( 1999, October). Catholic schools in perspective: Religious identity, achievement, and citizenship. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 105-113.
