Research extols the benefits of parent involvement in college choice, but low-SES African American parents are unable to match efforts of wealthier parents. This qualitative study found that in their communities the high school diploma was the normative credential for upward mobility. To this end, parents used narratives of struggle to motivate their children while utilizing maps that charted the course to high school completion. Findings suggest that in these families a high level of involvement towards high school completion exists, but that to shift expectations from high school to college completion requires unified and coordinated efforts from the Academy to pull parents into the college pipeline as early as middle school. The Academy must assume parents support their child's education and work with them to aggressively deliver critical college knowledge in the form of co-constructed maps that chart the course to college completion.
Auerbach, S. (2004). Engaging Latino parents in supporting college pathways: Lessons from a college access program. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3(2), 125-145.
2.
Berger, J.B. (2000). Optimizing capital, social reproduction, and undergraduate persistence: A sociological perspective. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 95-124). Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.
3.
Burgess, N.J. (1995). Female-headed households in socio-historical perspective . In B. J. Dickerson (Ed.), African American single mothers: Understanding their lives and families (pp. 21-36). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4.
Bowen, H.R. (1977). Progress toward human equality. In H. R. Bowen (Ed.), Investment in Learning: The individual and social value of American higher education (pp. 325-358). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5.
Bowler, M.K. (1974). The Nixon guaranteed income proposal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
6.
Cabrera, A.F., & La Nasa, S.M. (2001). On the path to college: Three critical tasks facing America's disadvantaged. Research in Higher Education, 42(2), 119-149.
7.
Chavkin, N.F. (1989). Debunking the myth about minority parents. Educational Horizons, 67(4), 119-123.
8.
Chavkin, N.F., & Williams, D.L. (1985) Executive summary of the final report: Parent involvement in the education project. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory .
9.
Chavkin, N.F., & Williams, D.L. (1989). Low-income parents' attitudes toward parent involvement in education. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 16(3), pp. 17-28.
10.
Chavkin, N.F., & Williams, D.L. (1993). Minority parents and the elementary school: Attitudes and practices. In N. F. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 73-83). Albany, New York: State of New York Press.
11.
Christenson, S.L., Rounds, T., & Franklin, M.J. (1992). Home-school collaboration: Effects, issues, and opportunities. School Psychology Quarterly , 2, 178-206.
12.
Christenson, S.L., & Sheridan, S.M. (2001). Schools and families: Creating essential connections for learning. New York: Guilford.
13.
Coleman, M., & Churchill, S. (1997). Challenges to family involvement. Childhood Education, 73, 144-148.
14.
Dauber, S.L., & Epstein, J.L. (1993). Parents' attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. F. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 53-72). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
15.
Davies, D. (1989, March). Poor parents, teachers, and the schools: Comments about practice, policy, and research. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.
16.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1991). Involving parents in the schools: A process of empowerment. American Journal of Education, 100(1), 20-46.
17.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1992). School matters in the Mexican-American home: Socializing children to education. American Educational Research Journal , 29, 495-513.
18.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1994a). Spanish-speaking families' involvement in schools . In C. L. Fagnano & B. Z. Werber (Eds.), School, family, and community interaction: A view from the firing lines (pp. 85-96). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
19.
Delgado-Gaitan, C. (1994b). Consejos: The power of cultural narratives. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 25, 298-316.
20.
Finders, M., & Lewis, C. (1994). Why some parents don't come to school. Education Leadership, 51(8), 50-54.
21.
Freeman, K. (2005). African Americans and college choice: The influence of family and school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
22.
Gandara, P., Horn, C., & Orfield, G. (2005). The access crisis in higher education. Educational Policy, 19, 255-261.
23.
Geenan, S., & Powers, L.E. (2001). Multicultural aspects of parent involvement in transition planning. Exceptional Children, 67, 265-282.
24.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine.
25.
Hill Collins, P. (2000). Black feminist thought (10th Anniversary ed.)New York: Routledge.
26.
Hossler, D., Braxton, J., & Coopersmith, G. (1989). Understanding student college choice In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. V, pp. 231-288). New York: Agathon Press.
27.
Hossler, D., & Gallagher, K.S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College and University, 62, 207-221.
28.
Hossler, D., Schmit, J., & Vesper, N. (1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore : Johns Hopkins University Press.
29.
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., Bassler, O.C., & Brissie, J.S. (1987). Parent involvement: Contributions of teacher efficacy, school socioeconomic status, and other school characteristics. American Educational Research Journal, 24, 417-435.
30.
Hoover-Dempsey, K.V., & Sandler, H.M. (1997). Why do parents become involved in their children's education? Review of Educational Research, 67(1), 3-42.
31.
Hornby, G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. New York: Cassell.
32.
Keniston, K., & The Carnegie Council on Children. (1977). All our children: The American family under pressure . New York: Harcourt, Brace, & Javanovich.
33.
Lareau, A. (1987). Social class differences in family-school relationships: The importance of cultural capital. Sociology of Education , 60, 73-85.
34.
Lareau, A., & Horvat, E.M. (1999). Moments of social inclusion: Race, class and cultural capital in family-school relationships. Sociology of Education , 71, 39-56.
35.
Lee, J., & Bowen, N.K. (2006). Parent involvement, cultural capital, and the achievement gap among elementary school children. American Educational Research Journal, 43, 193-218.
Lopez, S., Scribner, J., & Mahitivanichcha, K. (2001). Lessons from high-performing migrant-impacted schools. American Educational Research Journal , 38, 253-288.
38.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider. Freedom, CA : The Crossing Press.
39.
McDonough, P. (1994). Buying and selling higher education: The social construction of the college applicant. Journal of Higher Education , 65(4), 18-33.
40.
McDonough, P. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
41.
McDonough, P.M., & Calderone, S. (2006). The meaning of money: Perceptual differences between college counselors and low-income families about college costs and financial aid. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(12), 1-16.
42.
McKay, M.M.A., Atkins, M.S., Hawkins, T., Brown, C., Lynn, C.J. (2003). Inner-city African American parental involvement in children's schooling: Racial socialization and social support from the parent community. American Journal of Community Psychology , 31(1&2), 107-114.
43.
Moles, O.C. (1997). Reaching all families: The federal initiative in family-school partnerships. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
44.
Moles, O.C. (2000). Reaching all families: Creating family-friendly schools beginning of school year activities. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
45.
Pena, D.C. (2000). Parent involvement: Influencing factors and implications . Journal of Educational Research, 94(1), 42-54.
46.
Perez, L.X. (2000). The interface of individual, structural, and cultural constructs in Latino parents' effort to support their children in planning for college. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
47.
Prosise, R.D. (1990). The home-school relationship from an administrative perspective. Illinois School Journal, 69(2), 40-48.
48.
Rendon, L.I., Jalomo, R.E., & Nora, A. (2000). Theoretical considerations in the study of minority student retention in higher education. In J. M. Braxton (Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 127-156). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
49.
Smith, M.J. (2001). low-SES Black college choice: Playing on an unlevel playing field. Journal of College Admission, Spring(171), 16-21.
50.
Smith, M.J. (2002). Using sociological forms of capital and black feminist epistemology to understand African American parent participation in college choice. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
51.
Solorzano, D. (1992) Chicano mobility aspirations: A theoretical and empirical note. Latino Studies Journal, 3, 48-66.
52.
Stanton-Salazar, R.D. (1997). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 1-39.
53.
Staples, R., & Johnson, L.B. (1993). Black families at the crossroads: Challenges and prospects. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass .
54.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
Steiner, G.Y. (1976). The children's cause. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
56.
Striplin, J.J. (1999). Facilitating transfer for students with first-generation and low-income backgrounds (ERIC ED430627). ERIC Digest, June. Taken from http://www.eric.ed.gov.
57.
Terenzini, P.T., Springer, L., Yaeger, P.M., Pascarella, E.T., & Nora, A. (1996). First-Generation college students: Characteristics, experiences, and cognitive development. Research in Higher Education, 37(1), 1-20.
58.
Terenzini, P.T., Cabrera, A.F., & Bernal, E.M. (2001). Swimming against the tide: The poor in American higher education. College Entrance Examination Board. Retrieved November 7, 2005, from www.collegeboard.com/research/html/RDReport2001_1.pdf
59.
United States Bureau of the Census. (2007). The American Community-Blacks 2004 [ACS-04]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce: Economics and Statistics Administration.
60.
United States Department of Education. (1998 ). Parent Involvement in children's education: Efforts by public elementary schools [NCES 98-032]. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
61.
Vargas, J.H. (2004). College knowledge: Addressing information barriers to college. Boston: College Access Services: The Education Resources Institute (TERI).
62.
Walpole, M.B. (2003). Socioeconomic status and college: How SES affects college experiences and outcomes. The Review of Higher Education , 27, 45-73.
63.
Washington, V., & Oyemade, U.J. (1987). Project head start: Past, present, and future trends in the context of family needs. New York: Garland.
64.
Wilson, W.J. (1996). When work disappears: The world of the new urban poor. New York: Vintage Books.
65.
Winters, W.G. (1993). African-American mothers and urban schools: The power of participation. New York: Lexington Books.
66.
Wong, T. (2008, March). Purposive and snowball sampling in the study of ethnic and mainstream community organizations. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association , San Diego, CA.
