This study examines the achievement beliefs of urban adolescents enrolled in two Catholic high schools. Qualitative analysis of individual interviews revealed that these students endorse a strong sense of personal responsibility in their own learning, adhere to adaptive beliefs about difficulty and challenge in learning, and perceive their schools as caring environments in which teachers take a deep interest in both their academic and psychosocial well-being. Results suggest that educational reform efforts can be enhanced with a greater understanding of the motivational advantage associated with Catholic education. The authors argue that concerns over self-selection should not hinder researchers' attempts to understand the factors underlying the achievement of Catholic school students.
Altonji, J.G., Elder, T.E., & Taber, C.R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151-184.
2.
Bempechat, J. (2003). Meeting the psychological and emotional needs of young adolescents: Exploring achievement and motivation in Catholic high school students. Washington, DC: National Catholic Education Association.
3.
Bempechat, J., Drago-Severson, E., & Boulay, B.A. (2002). Attributions for success and failure in mathematics: A comparative study of Catholic and public school students. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 5, 357-372.
4.
Bryk, A., Lee, V., & Holland, P. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Carbonaro, W.J. (2003). Sector differences in student learning: Differences in achievement gains across school years and during the summer. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 7(2), 219-245.
6.
Cattaro, G.M. (2002a). Catholic schools: Enduring presence in urban America. Education and Urban Society, 35(1), 100-110.
7.
Cattaro, G.M. (2002b). Immigration and pluralism in urban Catholic schools . Education and Urban Society, 34(2), 199-211.
8.
Cheung, C., & Rudowicz, E. (2003). Underachievement and attributions among students attending schools stratified by student ability. Social Psychology ofEducation, 6(4), 303-323.
9.
Chubb, J.E. (2005). Within our reach: How America can educate every child. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
10.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Cognitive outcomes in public and private schools . Sociology of Education, 55, 65-76.
11.
Covington, M.V., & Dray, E. (2002). The developmental course of achievement motivation: A need-based approach. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 33-56). San Diego, CA : Academic Press.
12.
Eccles, J.S., Roeser, R., Vida, M., Fredricks, J., & Wigfield, A. (2006). Motivational and achievement pathways through middle childhood. In L. Balter & C. S. Tamis-LeMonda (Eds.), Child psychology: A handbook of contemporary issues (2nd ed., pp. 325-355). New York: Psychology Press.
13.
EdSource. (2006). Similar students, different results: Why do some schools do better?Palo Alto, CA: Author.
14.
Eide, E.R., Goldhaber, D.D., & Showalter, M.H. (2004). Does Catholic high school attendance lead to attendance at a more selective college?Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1335-1352.
15.
Ellison, B.J., & Hallinan, M.T. (2004). Ability grouping in Catholic and public schools. Catholic Education: A Journal of Inquiry and Practice, 8(1), 107-129.
16.
Goldberger, A., & Cain, G. (1982). The causal analysis of cognitive outcomes in the Coleman, Hoffer, and Kilgore report. Sociology of Education , 55, 103-122.
17.
Grant, H., & Dweck, C.S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541-553.
18.
Heubert, J. (2002). First, do no harm. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 26-30.
19.
Hill, P.T., Foster, G.E., & Gendler, T. (1990). High schools with character. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
20.
Hoxby, C. (2003). The economics of school choice. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research Conference Report.
21.
Ilg, T.J., Massucci, J.D., & Cattaro, G.M. (2004). Brown at 50: The dream is still alive in urban Catholic schools. Education and Urban Society, 36(3), 355-367.
22.
Lepper, M.R., Corpus, J.H., & Iyengar, S.S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientation in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184-196.
23.
Marsh, H.W., Hau, K., & Craven, R. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny . American Psychologist, 59(4), 269-271.
24.
Morgan, S.L. (2001). Counterfactuals, causal effect heterogeneity, and the Catholic school effect on learning. Sociology of Education , 74, 341-374.
25.
Nelson, M.D., & Bauch, P.A. (1997, March). African American students'perceptions of caring teacher behaviors at Catholic and public schools of choice. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association , Chicago.
26.
Nicholls, J.G. (1978). The development of the concepts of effort and ability, perception of own attainment, and the understanding that difficult tasks require more ability. Child Development, 49, 800-814.
27.
Nicholls, J.G., Nolen, S.B., & Thorkildsen, T.A. (1995). Big science, little teachers: Knowledge and motives concerning student motivation. In J. G. Nicholls & T. A. Thorkildsen (Eds.), Reasons for learning: Expanding the conversation on student-teacher collaboration (pp. 5-20). New York: Teachers College Press.
28.
Noddings, N. (2005). Care and moral education. In H. S. Shapiro & D. E. Purpel (Eds.), Critical social issues in American education: Democracy and meaning in a globalizing world (pp. 297-308). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Orfield, G., Frankenberg, E.D., & Lee, C. (2002). The resurgence of school segregation. Educational Leadership, 60(4), 16-20.
30.
Peterson, P.E., & Walberg, H.J. (2002). Countering the negative effect of poverty on learning . Chicago: Heartland Institute.
31.
Rand. (2005). Children at risk: Consequences for school readiness and beyond. Santa Monica, CA: Author.
32.
Rosenthal, R. (2002). The Pygmalion effect and its mediating mechanisms . In J. Aronson (Ed.), Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 25-36). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
33.
Salganik, L., & Karweit, N. (1982). Voluntarism and governance in education. Sociology of Education, 55, 152-161.
34.
Sander, W. (2001). The effects of Catholic schools on religiosity, education, and competition (Occasional Paper NCSPE-OP-32). New York: Teachers College.
35.
Sander, W., & Krautman, A.C. (1995). Catholic schools, dropout rates and educational attainment. Economic Inquiry, 33(2), 217-233.
36.
Schunk, D.H., & Pajares, F. (2002). The development of academic self-efficacy. In A. Wigfield & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Development of achievement motivation (pp. 15-31). New York: Academic Press.
37.
Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
38.
Weiner, B. (1994). Integrating social and personal theories of achievement strivings. Review of Educational Research, 64(4), 557-573.
39.
Weiner, B. (2005). Motivation from an attributional perspective and the social psychology of perceived competence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 73-84). New York: Guilford.
40.
Wentzel, K.R. (2002). Are effective teachers like good parents: Teaching styles and student adjustment in early adolescence. Child Development, 73(1), 287-301.
41.
Wentzel, K.R. (2004). Understanding classroom competence: The role of social-motivational and self-processes. In R. V. Kail (Ed.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 32, pp. 231-241). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
