In light of the elimination of busing to achieve racial integration and judicial reluctance to consider creative, new ways to provide integrated, high quality learning environments for poor and minority children, advocates of the principles established by Brown must no longer accept the public schools as the best hope for providing integrated schooling. Educators should seriously consider supporting Catholic schools as a viable option in effort to advance racial integration since absent immediate support, these models for integration might be lost for future generations.
Board of Education of Oklahoma City Public Schools v. Dowell, 498 U.S. 237 (1991).
4.
Brown v. Board of Education Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
5.
Brown v. Board of Education Topeka, 349 U.S. 294 (1955).
6.
Brown, J. A. (1996). Little David, play on your harp: A philosophy of Black religious pedagogy. In M. A. Chineworth (Ed.), Rise ‘n’ shine: Catholic education and the African-American community (pp. 29-49). Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
7.
Bryk, A. S., Easton, J. Q., Kerbow, D., Rollow, S. G., & Sebring, P. A. (1993). A view from the elementary schools: The state of reform in Chicago. Chicago: Steering Committee of the Consortium on Chicago School Research.
8.
Bryk, A. S., Lee, V. E., & Holland, P. B. (1993). Catholic schools and the common good. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
Bryk, A. S., Holland, P. B., Lee, V. E., & Carriedo, R. A. (1984). Effective Catholic schools: An exploration. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
10.
Buetow, H. A., (1970). Of singular benefit: The history of U.S. Catholic education. New York: Macmillian.
11.
Cibulka, J. G., O’Brien, T. J., & Zewe, D. (1982). Inner-city private elementary schools. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press.
12.
Clinchy, E. (2000). Creating new schools: How small schools are changing American education. New York: Teachers College Press.
13.
Coleman, J. S. (1988). “Social capital” and schools: One reason for higher private school achievement. Education Digest, 53, 6-9.
14.
Coleman, J., & Hoffer, T. (1987). Public and private schools: The impacts of communities. New York: Basic Books.
15.
Coleman, J., Hoffer, T., & Kilgore, S. (1982). Public and private schools. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
16.
Convey, J. (1992). Catholic schools make a difference: Twenty-five years of research. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
Crain, R. (1984). Private schools and Black-White segregation: Evidence from two big cities. Stanford, CA: Institute for Research on Educational Finance and Government.
19.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1997). The right to learn: A blueprint for creating schools that work. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
20.
Evans, W., & Schwab, R. (1995). Finishing high school and starting college: Do catholic schools make a difference? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 947-974.
21.
Fife, B. L. (1996). The supreme court and school desegregation since 1896. Equity and Excellence in Education, 29(2), 46-55.
22.
Figlio, D. N., & Stone, J. A. (1997). School choice and student performance: Are private schools really better (Discussion Paper No. 1141-97). Madison, WI: Institute for Research on Poverty.
23.
Fisher, M. T. (Ed.). (1997). NCEA/Ganley: Catholic schools in America elementary and secondary. Silverthorne, CO: Fisher.
24.
Franklin, V. P., & McDonald, E. B. (1988). Blacks in urban Catholic schools in the United States: A historical perspective. In D. T. Slaughter& O. J. Johnson (Eds.), Visible now: Blacks in private schools. Westport, CT: Greenwood.
25.
Freeman v. Pitts, 503 U.S. 467 (1992).
26.
Gales, W. G., & Park, J. R. (2000). Brookings-Wharton papers on urban affairs. Washington, DC: Brooking.
27.
Geredes, M. R. (1988). To educate and evangelize: Black Catholic schools of the oblate sisters of Providence. U.S. Catholic Historian, 7(2-3), 183-199.
28.
Greeley, A. W. (1982). Catholic high schools and minority students. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
29.
Greeley, A. M., & Rossi, P. B. (1966). The education of American Catholics. Chicago: Aldine.
30.
Greene, J. P. (1998). Civic values in public and private schools. In P. E. Peterson & B. C. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 83-106). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
31.
Greene, J. P. (2001) The surprising consensus on school choice. The Public Interest, 144, 19-35.
32.
Greene, J. P., & Mellow, N. (1998). Integration where it counts: A study of racial integration in public and private school lunchrooms. Retrieved December 2, 2003, from http://www.schoolchoices.org/roo/jay1.htm
33.
Haycock, K., & Duany, L. (1991). Developing the potential in Latino students. Principal, 70(3), 25-27.
34.
Hendrie, C. (1997, April 30). Without court orders, schools ponder how to pursue diversity. Education Week, XVI(31), pp. 1, 36.
35.
Hill, P. T., Foster, G. E., & Gendler, T. (1990). Magnet schools: Recent developments and perspectives. Austin, TX: Morgan Printing.
36.
Irvine, J. J. (1996). Segregation and academic excellence: African American catholic schools in the south. In J. J. Irvine & M. Foster (Eds.), Growing up African American in Catholic schools. New York: Teachers College Press.
37.
Keyes v. School District No. 1, Denver, Colorado, 413 U.S. 189 (1973).
38.
McDonald, D. (2002). United States Catholic elementary and secondary schools 2001-2002. Washington, DC: National Catholic Educational Association.
39.
Milliken v. Bradley, 418 U.S. 717 (1974).
40.
Mortimer, P., Rutter, M., Maugham, B., & Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41.
National Catholic Educational Association (NCEA). (1986). Catholic high schools: Their impact on low-income students. Washington, DC: NCEA
42.
National Catholic Educational Association (NCEA). (2004). Annual report on Catholic elementary and secondary schools. Retrieved December 6, 2003 from http://www.ncea.org/newinfo/catholicschooldata/
43.
National Research Council. (1989). A common destiny. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
44.
Neal, D. (1997). The effect of Catholic secondary schooling on educational attainment. Journal of Labor Economics, 15, 98-123.
45.
Orfield, G. (1996). Turning back to desegregation. In G. Orfield, S. Eaton, & The Harvard Project on Desegregation (Eds), Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of education (pp. 1-22). New York: The New Press.
46.
Orfield, G., Bachmeier, M. D., James, D. R., & Eitle, T. (1997). Deepening Segregation in American Schools: A Special Report from the Harvard Project on School Desegregation. Equity and Excellence in Education, 30(2), 5-24.
47.
Orfield, G., Eaton, S. E., & Jones, E. R. (1997). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. Board of education. New York: The New Press.
48.
Orfield, G., Monfort, F., & Aaron, M. (1989). Status of school desegregation 1968-1986. A report of the Council of Urban Boards of Education and the National School Desegregation research project, University of Chicago. Washington, DC: National School Boards Association, Council of Urban Boards of Education.
49.
Orland, M. E. (1990). Demographics of disadvantage. In J. I. Goodlad & P. Keating (Eds.), Access to knowledge: An agenda for our nation’s schools (pp. 43-58). New York: The College Board.
50.
Peterson, P. E., & Walberg, H. J. (2002). Countering the Negative Effective of Poverty on Learning. Chicago: The Heartland Institute.
51.
Portes, A., & Gran, D. E. (1991). Characteristics and performance of high school students in Dade County (Miami SMSA) schools. New York: The College Board.
52.
Ravitch, D., & Galston, W. A. (1996, December 17). Scholarships for inner-city school kids. The Wall Street Journal, p. 8.
53.
Riley, R.W. (1996). Promoting involvement in learning. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 27, 3-4.
54.
Sander, W. (1996). Catholic grade schools and academic achievement. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 540-548.
55.
Sander, W., & Krautmann, A.C. (1995). Catholic schools, dropout rates, and educational attainment. Economic Inquiry, 33(2), 217-233.
56.
Steinberg, A. (1992). Catholic schools: Do they offer lessons for public school reform? The Harvard Education Letter, 111, 3.
57.
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1 (1971).
58.
Taeuber, K., Smock, P J., & Taeuber, A. F. (1990). Resegregation of Public School Districts: 1968-1986. Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, Center for Demography and Ecology.
59.
Taylor, W. L., & Piche, D. M. (1990). A report on shortchanging children: The impact of fiscal inequality on the education of students at risk. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Education, NCES. (1988). National Education Longitudinal Study of 1988, “Fourth Follow-Up.” Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
62.
U.S. Department of Education, NCES. (2000). Public, Public Charter, and Private School Surveys. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
63.
Willis, H. D. (1994). The Shifting Focus in School Desegregation. Paper presented to the SWRL Board of Directors and The 1995 Equity Conference.
