This study investigates race views of students from a Midwestern, predominantly White, all-male high school. Findings corroborate a belief that students at the pre-sophomore college level lack a proper understanding of affirmative action (AA). Forty-three percent (n = 266) lacked knowledge altogether, whereas 30% (n = 188) opposed AA as a job hiring and promotion (out-come) measure. Conversely, a majority of students (n = 394, 65%) supported AA as an academic scholarship (front-end) measure, compared to those opposed (n = 188, 30%). When using a .05 alpha criterion, significant differences were shown for relationships between (a) job-hiring AA and age of student, grade average, and four selected social policy variables, and (b) academic scholarship AA and five of the social welfare indices. Five of the eleven relationships disappeared, however, when a stricter .01 rule was applied. In spite of the school's elitist reputation, students were supportive of multicultural education, adding credence to the argument that blatant racism is not the only factor that drives the antiracial preference movement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrew, S. (1998). Still haunted by the ghosts of slavery. New Statesman, 127(4414), 30.
2.
Bobo, L. (1998). Race, interests, and beliefs about affirmative action: Unanswered questions and new directions. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(7), 985-1004.
3.
Brimelow, P. (1992). Spiral of silence. Forbes, 149(11), 76-77.
4.
Champion, C. (1996). Male honkies need not apply. Alberta Report Newsmagazine, 23(30), 24-25.
5.
Chang, M. J. (2001). Linking diversity and educational purpose: How diversity affects the classroom environment and student development. In G. Orfield, & M. Kurlaender (Eds.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 175-186). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
6.
Corporate Source. (1998a). Attitudes and opinions from the nation's high achieving teens: 29th annual survey of high achievers (Report No. PS027313). Lake Forest, IL: Who's Who Among American High School Students Survey. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED429671)
7.
Corporate Source. (1998b). Reconsidering affirmative action. Wilson Quarterly, 22(4), 123-125.
8.
Cortese. A. J. (1992). Affirmative action: Are white women gaining at the expense of black men? Equity and Excellence, 25(2-4), 77-89.
9.
Cose, E. (1993). To the victors, few spoils. Newsweek Magazine, 121(13), 54.
10.
Elder, L. (2000). The ten things you can't say in America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
11.
Elder, L. (2002). Showdown: Confronting bias, lies, and the special interests that divide America. New York: St. Martin's Press.
12.
Emilius, P. J. (1999). Don't shut out white males. Engineering News Record, 242(16), 95.
13.
Farley, J. E. (2000). Majority-minority relations (4th ed., chapter 15). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Farrell, C. S. (1996). Is racism a male thing? Black Issues in Higher Education, 13(16), 22-25.
15.
Foner, E. (1995). Hiring quotas for white males only. Nation, 120(25), 924-925.
16.
Gamson, W. A. (1999). Ambivalence about affirmative action. Society, 26(6), 41-45.
17.
Gose, B. (2000). Most students oppose racial preferences in admissions, survey finds. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(35), A52.
18.
Gravetter, F., & Wallnau, L. B. (2000). Statistics for the behavior sciences (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning.
19.
Hiebert, R. (1996). Especially no white males. Alberta Report Newsmagazine, 23(42), 34-36.
20.
Jacob-Arriola, K. R., & Cole, E. R. (2001). Framing the affirmative action debate: Attitudes toward out-group members and white identity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31(12), 2462-2483.
21.
Kahlenberg, R. D. (1996). The remedy: Class, race, and affirmative action. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
23.
Kinder, D. R., & Sanders, L. (1996). Divided by color: Racial politics and democratic ideals. Chicago: University Press.
24.
Klugel, J. R. (1985). If there isn't a problem, you don't need a solution: The bases of contemporary affirmative action attitudes. American Behavioral Scientist, 28(July), 761-784.
25.
Klugel, J. R., & Smith, E. R. (1983). Affirmative action attitudes: Effects of self-interest, racial affect, and stratification beliefs on whites' views. Social Forces, 61(March), 797-824.
26.
Lewis, A. E., Chesler, M., & Forman, T. A. (2000). The impact of colorblind ideologies on students of color: Intergroup relations at a predominantly white university. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1), 74-91.
27.
Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1978). The Bakke case: How would it be decided at the bar of public opinion? Public Opinion, 1, 34-38.
28.
Lipson, H. D. (1996). How does race matter: White male college students' perspectives on institutional racism and affirmative action (Report No. HE029123). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394429)
29.
Lynch, F. R. (1992). Race unconsciousness and the white male. Society, 29(2), 30-35.
30.
Lynch, F. R., & Beer, W. R. (1990). You ain't the right color, pal: White resentment of affirmative action. Policy Review, 51(Winter), 64-67.
31.
Maier, M. (1997, Summer). Invisible privilege: What white men don't see. The Diversity Factor, 28-33.
32.
McLean, C. (2002). The merit of merit. Report Newsmagazine, 29(8), 34-35.
33.
McQueen, A. (1999). Conservatives attack affirmative action. Community College Week, 11(15), 3-4.
34.
McWhorter, J. H. (2000). Losing the race: Self-sabotage in black America. New York: Free Press.
35.
Miller, F., & Clark, M. A. (1997). Looking forward. American Behavioral Scientist, 41(2), 262-271.
36.
Miller, G. (2000). Study: Racial prejudice is reason for affirmative action resistance. Black Issues in Higher Education, 17(2), 14.
37.
Nebraska Department of Health and Human Services. (1998). Racial breakouts of temporary assistance for needy families (TANF) recipients. (Available from State of Nebraska, P.O. Box 95026, Lincoln, NE 68509-5026.)
38.
Nelson, T. E. (1999). Group affect and attribution in social policy opinion. Journal of Politics, 61,(2), 331-363.
39.
Phillip, D. (1996). White males get hosed. Alberta Report Newsmagazine, 23(19), 14.
40.
Rai, K. B., & Critzer, J. W. (2000). Affirmative action and the university: Race, ethnicity, and gender in higher education. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
41.
Sax, L. J., & Arredondo, M. (1996). Student attitudes toward affirmative action in higher education: Findings from a national study (Report No. HE029163). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED394467)
42.
Sax, L. J., & Arredondo, M. (1999). Student attitudes toward affirmative action in college admissions. Research in Higher Education, 40(4), 439-459.
43.
Sears, D. O., Van Larr, C., Carrillo, M., & Kosterman, R. (1997). Is it really racism? The origins of white Americans' opposition to race-targeted policies. Public Opinion Quarterly, 61, 16-53.
44.
Siegel, S., & Castellan, N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
45.
Smith, K. M. (1993). The impact of college on white students' racial attitudes (Report No. HE026661). Paper presented at the Annual Forum for the Association for Institutional Research Association, Chicago, IL. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED360923)
46.
Smith, W. A. (1998). Gender and racial/ethnic differences in the affirmative action attitudes of U.S. college students. Journal of Negro Education, 67(2), 127-141.
47.
Sniderman, P. M., & Carmines, E. G. (1997). Reaching beyond race. Political Science and Politics, 30(3), 466-471.
48.
Sniderman, P. M., & Piazza, T. (1993). The scar of race. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
49.
Sowell, T. (1975). Affirmative action reconsidered: Was it necessary in academia? Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
50.
Sowell, T. (1990). Preferential policies: An international perspective. New York: W. Morrow Publishers.
51.
Steele, S. (1990). Content of our character: A new vision of race in America. New York: St. Martin Press.
52.
Steele, S. (1998). A dream deferred: The second betrayal of black freedom in America. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
53.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Temporary assistance for needy families report to Congress. Retrieved August 16, 2002, from the Administration for Children and Families Web site: http://www.acf.dhhs.gov/programs/opre/ar2001/charter10.doc
54.
Whitaker, C. (2001). Affirmative action's last stand. Ebony Magazine, 56(9), 108-111.
55.
Williams-Harold, B. (1998). Perception is nine-tenths of reality. Black Enterprise, 28(6), 18.
56.
Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
57.
Wolf-Devine, C. (1997). Which side are the angels on? Academe, 83(1), 24-28.
