How does the organization affect the occupation? This article takes a collective look at school organizations, magnet schools as instruments of school choice and traditional schools, and the effect they have on teacher professionalization. Research indicates that the benefits of increased teacher professionalization include greater commitment, higher retention rates, and higher student outcomes—all major issues in school reform debates. Using a national-level data set, the author investigates four elements of professionalization in both the magnet and traditional school contexts to ascertain the impact the school organization has on teacher professionalization. The results indicate the magnet school context is indeed noteworthy in the areas of autonomy, both classroom control and influence on school policy, and professional development and salary, but is not significant in teacher credentialing.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abbott, A.
(1988). The systems ofprofessions: An essay on the division ofexpert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Baker, D.
, & Smith, T. (1997). Trend 2: Teacher turnover and teacher quality: Refocusing the issue. Teachers College Record, 99, 29-36.
3.
Bascia, N.
(2000). The other side of the equation: Professional development and the organizational capacity of teacher unions. Educational Policy, 14, 385-405.
4.
Blank, R.
(1990). Educational effects of magnet high schools. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Choice and control in American education (Vol. 2). London: Falmer.
5.
Blank, R.
, & Archbald, D. (1992). Magnet schools and issues of equity. Clearing House, 66, 81-89.
6.
Blank, R.
, Levine, R., & Steele, L. (1996). After 15 years: Magnet schools in urban education. In B. Fuller, R. Elmore, & G. Orefield (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 154-172). New York: Teachers College Press.
7.
Blank, R. K.
, Dentler, R. A., Baltzell, D. C., & Chabotar, K. (1983). Survey ofmagnet schools (Final Report). Washington, DC: Department of Education.
8.
Chubb, J.
, & Moe, T. (1990a). America’s public schools: Choice is a panacea. Brookings Review, 8, 4-13.
9.
Chubb, J.
, & Moe, T. (1990b). Politics, markets and America’s schools. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
10.
Cohn, M. M.
, & Kottkamp, R. B. (1993). Teachers: The missing voice in education. Albany: State University of New York Press.
11.
Darling-Hammond, L.
(1997). School reform at the crossroads: Confronting the central issue of teaching. Educational Policy, 11, 151-167.
12.
Darling-Hammond, L.
(2000). Reforming teacher preparation and licensing: Debating the evidence. Teachers College Record, 102, 28-57.
13.
Desimone, L.
(2000). Defining professional development that works. Educational Leadership, 57, 8-8.
14.
Devaney, K.
, & Sykes, G. (1988). Making the case for professionalism. In A. Lieberman (Ed.), Building a professional culture in schools (pp. 3-23). New York: Teachers College Press.
15.
Enderlin-Lampe, S.
(1997). Shared decision making in schools: Effect on teacher efficacy. Education, 118, 150-157.
16.
Esposito, F.
(1995). The new improved sorting machine. In M. Tannenbaum (Ed.), Concepts and issues in school choice. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
17.
Etzioni, A.
(1969). The semi-professions and their organizations. New York: Free Press.
18.
Farmer, B.
, & Farmer, E. (2000). Organizational structures of teachers in traditional and magnet schools in a large urban school district. Education and Urban Society, 33, 60-74.
19.
Firestone, W.
, & Bader, B. (1991). Restructuring teaching: An assessment of frequently considered options. Educational Policy, 5, 119-137.
20.
Gamoran, A.
(1996, October). Do magnet schools boost achievement?Educational Leadership, pp. 42-46.
21.
Hall, R.
(1968). Professionalization and bureaucratization. American Sociological Review, 33, 92-104.
22.
Hausman, C.
, Goldring, E., & Moirs, K. (1997). Organizational capacity for school improvement: Teacher reports in magnet and non-magnet schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 407709)
23.
Heid, C.
, & Leak, L. (1991). School choice plans and the professionalization of teaching. Education and Urban Society, 23, 219-228.
24.
Henig, J.
(1999). School choice outcomes. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kramer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy (pp. 68-107). Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
25.
Henig, J.
, & Sugarman, S. (1999). The nature and extent of school choice. In S. D. Sugarman & F. R. Kramer (Eds.), School choice and social controversy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.
26.
Hess, F.
, Maranto, R., & Millman, S. (2000). Resistance in the trenches: What shapes teachers’ attitudes to school choice?Educational Policy, 14, 195-214.
27.
Hughes, E.
(1965). Professions. In K. Lynn (Ed.), The professions in America (pp. 1-14). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
28.
Inger, M.
(1991). Improving urban education with magnet schools. ERIC/CUE Digest, 76. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED340813)
29.
Ingersoll, R.
(1997). Teacher professionalization and teacher commitment: A multilevel analysis (NCES No. 97-069). Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics.
30.
Ingersoll, R.
(2001). The status of teaching as a profession. In J. Ballantine & J. Spade (Eds.), Schools and society. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
31.
Johnson, S.
(1990). Teachers, power, and school change. In W. H. Clune & J. F. Witte (Eds.), Control and choice in American education (pp. 343-390). London: Falmer.
32.
Larson, J. C.
, & Allen, B. (1988). A microscope on magnet schools, 1983 to 1986: Vol. 2. Pupil and parent outcomes. Rockville, MD: Montgomery Public Schools.
33.
Lee, V. E.
(1995). Rewarding or creaming?Social Science Quarterly, 76, 513-531.
34.
Lieberman, A.
(1988). Building a professional culture in schools. New York: Columbia University.
35.
Lieberman, A.
, & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: Transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.
36.
Lortie, D.
(1975). Schoolteacher—A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37.
Louis, K. S.
(1990). Social and community values and the quality of teachers’work life. In M. McLaughlin, T. Talbert, & N. Bascia (Eds.), The contexts ofteaching in secondary schools: Teachers’realities (pp. 17-39). New York: Teachers College Press.
38.
Magi Educational Services
. (1985). New York State magnet school research study. Albany: State Education Department.
39.
Martinez, V.
, Goodwin, K., Kremmer, F., & Perna, L. (1995). The consequence of school choice: Who leaves and who stays in the inner city?Social Science Quarterly, 76, 485-501.
40.
McClure, R.
(1999). Individual growth and institutional renewal. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Staff development for education in the 90s: New demands, new realities, new perspectives (pp. 221-241). New York: Teachers College Press.
41.
McNeil, L.
(1985). Teacher culture and the irony of school reform. In P. G. Altbach, G. P. Kelly, & L. Wies (Eds.), Excellence in education. New York: Prometheus Press.
42.
Metz, M. H.
(1990). Magnet schools and the reform of public schools. In W. L. Boyd & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Choice in education: Potential and problems. Berkeley, CA: McCutchan.
43.
National Center for Education Statistics
. (1993-1994). Schools and staffing survey. User’s manual. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
44.
National Center for Education Statistics
. (1996). Public school choice programs, 1993-94: Availability and student participation (IB-9-96). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
45.
Olsen, L.
(1986, April). Teachers’ work environment not supportive poll confirms. Education Week, pp. 1-1, 43-43.
46.
Owens, R. G.
(1987). Organizational behavior in education. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
47.
Pyszkowski, I. S.
(1991). Teaching: The at risk profession. Education, 111, 586-592.
48.
Raywid, M. A.
(1989). The mounting case for schools of choice. In J. Nathan (Ed.), Public schools by choice: Expanding opportunities for parents, students and teachers (pp. 13-14). St. Paul, MN: Institute for Teaching and Learning.
49.
Rosenholtz, S.
(1989). Teachers’ workplace: The social organization ofschools. New York: Longman.
50.
Rosenholtz, S.
, & Simpson, C. (1990). Workplace conditions and the rise and fall of teacher commitment. Sociology of Education, 63, 241-257.
51.
Saporito, S.
, & Lareau, A. (1999). School selection as a process: The multiple dimensions of race framing choice. Social Problems, 46, 3-3.
52.
Smrekar, C.
, & Goldring, E. (1999). School choice in urban America—Magnet schools and the pursuit ofequity. New York: Teachers College Press.
53.
Squires, G.
(1999). Teaching as a professional discipline. London: Falmer.
54.
Steel, L.
, & Levine, R. (1994). Education innovation in multiracial context: The growth ofmag net schools in American education. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
55.
Teberg, A.
(1999). Identified professional development needs of teachers in curriculum reform. Paper presented at the American Research Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED430976)
56.
Vollmer, H.
, & Mills, D. (1966). Professionalization. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
57.
Wilensky, H.
(1964). The professionalization of everyone. American Journal of Sociology, 70, 137-158.
