Anderson, G. L.
, & Grinberg, J. (1998). Educational administration as a disciplinary practice: Appropriating Foucault’s view of power, discourse, and method. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 329-353.
2.
Berliner, D.
, & Biddle, B. (1995). The manufactured crisis: Myths, fraud, and the attack on America’s public schools. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Carnoy, M.
, Loeb, S., & Smith, T. L. (2000, April). Do higher state test scores in Texas make for better high school outcomes? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
5.
Dennis, D.
(1995). Brave new reductionism. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 3(9), 1-20.
6.
Derber, C.
(1998). Corporation nation: How corporations are taking over our lives and what we can do about it. New York: St. Martin’s.
7.
Fuller, E. J.
, & Johnson, J. F., Jr. (2001). Can state accountability systems drive improvements in school performance for children of color and children from low-income homes?Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 260-283.
8.
Haney, W.
(2000). The myth of the Texas miracle in education. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(41) [Online]. Available: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n41
9.
Johnson, J. F.
(1998). The promise of school reform in Texas. Austin, TX: The Charles Dana Center [Online]. Available: www.starcenter.org/documents/prac.htm
10.
Klein, S. P.
, Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., & Stecher, B. M. (2000). What do test scores in Texas tell us? (RAND Education Issue Paper) [Online]. Available: www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP202
11.
Kozol, J.
(1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America’s schools. New York: Harper.
12.
Levin, H.
(1998). Educational performance standards and the economy. Educational Researcher, 27(4), 4-10.
13.
McNeil, L.
(2000). Contradictions of school reform: The educational costs of standardized testing. New York: Routledge.
14.
Meier, D.
(2000). Will standards save public education?Boston: Beacon.
15.
Meyer, J.
, & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 341-363.
16.
National Commission on Excellence in Education
. (1983). A nation at risk. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
17.
Ogawa, R.
, Stine, D., & Huston, D. (1998). California’s class-size reduction initiative: Differences in teacher experience and qualifications across schools. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 424628)
18.
Scheurich, J. J.
, Skrla, L., & Johnson, J. F., Jr. (2000). Thinking carefully about equity and accountability. Phi Delta Kappan, 82(4), 293-299.
19.
Schrag, P.
(2000). Too good to be true. American Prospect, 3, 46-49.
20.
Shirley, D.
(1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin: University of Texas Press.
21.
Skrla, L.
, & Scheurich, J. J. (2001). Displacing deficit thinking in school district leadership. Education and Urban Society, 33(3), 235-259.
22.
Skrla, L.
, Scheurich, J. J., & Johnson, J. F., Jr. (2000). Equity-driven, achievement-focused school districts: A report on systemic school success in four Texas school districts serving diverse student populations. Austin, TX: Charles A. Dana Center.
23.
Tyack, D.
, & Cuban, L. (1995). Tinkering toward utopia: A century of public school reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
