Arizona Revised Statute §15-183, §15-185 [Online]. (2000). Retrieved September 25, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.azleg.state.az.us/ars/15/183.htm
2.
Budde, R.
(1988). Education by charter: Restructuring school districts, key to long-term continuing improvement in American education. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast & Islands.
3.
Center for Education Reform
. (2000). Charter school legislation: State rankings [Online]. Retrieved May 18, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://edreform.com/laws/ranking.htm
4.
Charter School Accountability Framework [Online]. (2000). Retrieved September 25, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://cfl.state.mn.us/charter/accountability.pdf
5.
Chubb, J. E.
, & Moe, T. M. (1988). What price democracy?Politics, markets and American schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
6.
Cronbach, L. J.
(1991). Functional evaluation design for a world of political accommodation. In W. R. Shadish, T. D. Cook, & L. C. Leviton (Eds.), Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice (pp. 323-376). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
7.
Darling-Hammond, L.
(1988, Winter). Accountability and teacher professionalism. American Educator, 8-13, 38-43.
8.
Darling-Hammond, L.
(1989, Fall). Accountability for professional practice. Teachers College Record, 91(1), 59-80.
9.
Dorn, S.
(1998). The political legacy of school accountability systems. Education Policy Analysis Archives, [Online] 6(1). Retrieved March 2, 1998, from the World Wide Web: http://olam.ed.asu.edu/epaa/v6n1/
10.
Flake, J. L.
(1995, August 26). Odd view of accountability. The Arizona Republic, p. B6-B6.
11.
Garn, G. A. (2000). Moving from bureaucratic to market accountability: The problem of imperfect information. Manuscript submitted for publication.
12.
Gintis, H.
(1995). The political economy of school choice. Teachers College Record, 96(3), 492-511.
13.
Glass, G. V.
(1972, June). The many faces of educational accountability: What is genuine accountability and what is sham?Phi Delta Kappan, 53, 636-639.
14.
Glasser, B. G.
, & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
15.
Hartley, M.
(1995, August 20). Accountability missing from charter schools. The Arizona Republic, p. E3-E3.
16.
House, E. R.
(1993). Professional evaluation: Social impact and political consequences. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17.
Kansas Revised Statute §72-1904, §72-1905, §72-1906, §72-1910 [Online]. (2000). Retrieved September 1, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.ksbe.state.ks.us/charter/ law.html
18.
Kirp, D.
(1982). Professionalization as a policy choice. World Politics, 34(2), 137-174.
19.
Kirst, M.
(1990). Accountability: Implications for state and local policymakers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Information Services.
20.
Levin, H.
(1974). A conceptual framework for accountability in education. School Review, 82, 363-391.
21.
Miles, M. B.
, & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An expanded sourcebook: Qualitative data analysis (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22.
Minnesota Statutes [Online]. (2000). Retrieved September 25, 2000, from the World Wide Web: http://www.revisor.leg.state.mn.us/stats/124D/10.html
23.
Rivera, M. J. (1994). Accountability and educational reform in Rochester, New York (Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, 1994). Dissertation Abstracts International. (University Microfilms No. 9432425)
24.
Shadish, W. R., Jr.
, Cook, T. D., & Leviton, L. C. (Eds.). (1991). Foundations of program evaluation: Theories of practice. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
25.
Shanker, A.
(1988). Restructuring our schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 65(3), 88-100.
26.
Smith, M. S.
(1988). Educational indicators. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(7), 487-491.
27.
Winthrop, H.
(1975, January). Accountability in education via a policy-making and planning orientation. Peabody Journal of Education, 52, 127-134.
28.
Wohlstetter, P.
(1991). Accountability mechanisms for state education reform: Some organizational alternatives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13(1), 31-48.
