Beck, L.
, & Murphy, J. (1995). Searching for a robust understanding of the principalship. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 387-396.
2.
Brubaker, D.
(1995). How the principalship has changed: Lessons from principals’ life stories. NASSP Bulletin, 79(574), 88-95.
3.
Cooley, V. E.
, & Shen, J. (2000). Factors influencing applying for urban principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 443-454.
4.
Crow, G.
, Matthews, J., & McCleary, L. (1996). Leadership: A relevant and realistic role for principals. Princeton, NJ: Eye on Education.
5.
Daresh, J.
(1990). Formation: The missing ingredient in administrator preparation. NASSP Bulletin, 74(526), 1-5.
6.
Goodlad, J. I.
(1990). Teachers for our nation’s schools. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
7.
Hallinger, P.
(1992). Changing norms of principal leadership in the United States. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-48.
8.
Hallinger, P.
, & Heck, R. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157-191.
9.
Heck, R.
, Larson, T., & Marcoulides, G. (1990). Principal instructional leadership and school achievement: Validation of a causal model. Educational Administration Quarterly, 26, 94-125.
10.
Heck, R.
, & Marcoulides, G. (1992). Principal assessment: Conceptual problem, methodological problem, or both?Peabody Journal of Education, 68(1), 124-144.
11.
Heller, G.
(1995). Helping students celebrate diversity in our schools. NASSP Bulletin, 79(567), 31-39.
12.
Kimball, K.
, & Sirotnik, K. A. (2000). The urban school principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 535-543.
13.
Malen, B.
(1999). The promises and perils of participation on site-based councils. Theory Into Practice, 38, 209-216.
14.
Mitchel, L. Z.
(2000). A place where every teacher teaches and every student learns. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 506-518.
15.
Mosrie, D.
(1990). An effective principal training and support system. NASSP Bulletin, 74(526), 12-15.
16.
Murphy, J.
(1994). Redefining the principalship in restructuring schools. NASSP Bulletin, 78(560), 94-99.
17.
Ogawa, R. T.
, & Malen, B. (1991). Towards rigor in reviews of multivocal literatures: Applying the exploratory case study method. Review of Educational Research, 61, 265-313.
18.
Parkay, F.
, Currie, G., & Rhodes, J. (1995). Professional socialization: A longitudinal study of first-time high school principals. Educational Administration Quarterly, 28, 43-75.
19.
Polite, V. C.
, McClure, R. M., & Rollie, D. L. (1997). The emerging reflective urban principal: The role of the shadowing encounters. Urban Education, 31, 466-489.
20.
Portin, B.
(2000). The changing urban principalship. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 492-505.
21.
Schmuck, P.
, & Schmuck, R. (1994). Gender equity: A critical democratic component of America’s high schools. NASSP Bulletin, 78(558), 22-27.
22.
Shen, J.
(1998). Do teachers feel empowered?Educational Leadership, 55(7), 35-36.
23.
Stronge, J. H.
(1993). Defining the principalship: Instructional leader or middle manager. NASSP Bulletin, 77, 1-7.
24.
Su, Z.
, Adams, J., & Mininberg, E. (2000). Profiles and preparation of urban school principals. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 455-480.
25.
Wegenke, G.
(2000). Principal’s role in school restructuring in the Des Moines public schools. Education and Urban Society, 32(4), 519-534.
26.
Weindling, D.
(1990). The secondary school headteacher: New principals in the United Kingdom. NASSP Bulletin, 74(526), 40-45.
