This study reports the results of efforts of school officials to implement family and community involvement activities to reduce the number of disciplinary actions and to ensure a school climate focused on learning. Using longitudinal data from elementary and secondary schools, analyses indicate that regardless of schools’prior rates of discipline, the more family and community involvement activities were implemented, the fewer students were disciplined by being sent to principals’offices or given detention or in-school suspension. Activities for two types of involvement, parenting and volunteering, were most predictive of reducing the percentages of students who were subject to discipline. Also, schools that improved the quality of their partnership programs reported fewer students in need of discipline. The results suggest that creating more connections and greater cooperation among the school, family, and community contexts may be one way for schools to improve student behavior and school discipline.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adelman, H. S.
, & Taylor, L. (1998). Reframing mental health in schools and expanding school reform. Educational Psychologist, 33, 135-152.
2.
Anderson, M.
, Kaufman, J., Simon, T., Barrios, L., Paulozzi, L., Ryan, G., et al. (2001). School-associated violent deaths in the United States, 1994-1999. Journal of the American Medical Association, 286, 2695-2702.
3.
Astor, R. A.
, Meyer, H. A., & Pitner, R. O. (2001). Elementary and middle school students’perceptions of violence-prone school subcontexts. The Elementary School Journal, 101, 511-528.
4.
Balli, S. J.
, Demo, D. H., & Wedman, J. F. (1998). Family involvement with children’s homework: An intervention in the middle grades. Family Relations, 47, 149-157.
5.
Barton, P. E.
, Coley, R. J., & Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Order in the classroom: Violence, discipline, and student achievement. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
6.
Berends, M.
, Pallas, A. M., & Spade, J. Z. (1996). Safe, disciplined, and drug-free schools: Issue sheet. In K. M. Borman, P. W. Cookson, Jr., A. R. Sadovnik, & J. Z. Spade (Eds.), Implementing educational reform: Sociological perspectives on educational policy (pp. 82-86). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
7.
Bowen, N. K.
(1999). A role for school social workers in promoting student success through school-family partnerships. Social Work in Education, 21, 34-47.
8.
Bowen, N. K.
, & Bowen, G. L. (1999). Effects of crime and violence in neighborhoods and schools on the school behavior and performance of adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 14, 319-342.
9.
Brener, N. D.
, Simon, T. R., Krug, E. G., & Lowry, R. (1999). Recent trends in violence-related behaviors among high school students in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 440-446.
10.
Catsambis, S.
, & Beveridge, A. A. (2001). Does neighborhood matter? Family, neighborhood, and school influences on eighth grade mathematics achievement. Sociological Focus, 34, 435-457.
11.
Clark, S.
(2002, December/January). District chops away at suspensions: Are schools calmer?Catalyst for Cleveland Schools, pp. 4-6.
12.
Dauber, S. L.
, & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parents’attitudes and practice of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 53-71). Albany: State University of New York Press.
13.
Dwyer, K.
, Osher, D., & Warger, C. (1998). Earlywarning timelyresponse: A guide to safe schools. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
14.
Elliott, D. S.
, Wilson, W. J., Huizinga, D., Sampson, R. J., Elliott, A., & Rankin, B. (1996). The effects of neighborhood disadvantage on adolescent development. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 33, 389-426.
15.
Epstein, J. L.
(1987). Toward a theory of family-school connections: Teacher practices and parent involvement. In K. Hurrelman, F. Kaufmann, & F. Losel (Eds.), Social intervention: Potential and constraints (pp. 121-136). New York: Aldine.
16.
Epstein, J. L.
(1991). Effects on student achievement of teacher practices of parent involvement. In S. Silvern(Ed.), Advances in reading/language research: Literacythrough family, community, and school interaction. (Vol. 5, pp. 261-276). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
17.
Epstein, J. L.
(1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan, 76, 701-712.
18.
Epstein, J. L.
(2001). School, family, and community partnerships: Preparing educators and improving schools. Boulder, CO: Westview.
19.
Epstein, J. L.
, & Sheldon, S. B. (in press). Present and accounted for: Improving student attendance through family and community involvement. Journal of Education Research.
20.
Flaxman, E.
(Ed.). (2001). Evaluating school violence programs. New York: ERIC Clearninghouse on Urban Education.
21.
Gottfredson, D. C.
(1996). The social organization of safe high schools. In K. M. Borman, P. W. Cookson, Jr., A. R. Sadovnik, & J. Z. Spade (Eds.), Implementing educational reform: Sociological perspectives on educational policy (pp. 339-358). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
22.
Gottfredson, D. C.
, Gottfredson, G. D., & Hybl, L. G. (1993). Managing adolescent behavior: A multiyear, multischool study. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 179-215.
23.
Gottfredson, G. D.
, & Gottfredson, D. C. (1985). Victimization in schools. New York: Plenum.
24.
Hess, F. M.
(2002). School boards at the dawn of the 21st century: Conditions and challenges of district governance. Alexandria, VA: National School Board Association.
25.
Kaufman, P.
, Chen, X., Choy, S. P., Ruddy, S. A., Miller, A. K., Fleury, J. K., et al. (2000). Indicators of school crime and safety: 2000. Education Statistics Quarterly, 2, 43-47.
26.
Learning First Alliance
. (2001) Everychild learning: Safe and supportive schools. Washington, DC: Associationfor Supervisionand Curriculum Development.
27.
Lee, S. (1994). Family-school connections and students’ education: Continuity and change of family involvement from the middle grades to high school. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
28.
Lee, V. E.
, & Croninger, R. G. (1996). The social organization of safe high schools. In K. M. Borman, P. W. Cookson, Jr., A. R. Sadovnik, & J. Z. Spade (Eds.), Implementing educational reform: sociological perspectives on educational policy (pp. 359-400). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
29.
Ma, X.
(2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims?American Educational Research Journal, 38, 351-370.
30.
McLaughlin, M. W.
, & Irby, M. A. (1994). Urban sanctuaries: Neighborhood organizations that keep hope alive. Phi Delta Kappan, 75, 300-306.
31.
McPartland, J. M.
, & Nettles, S. M. (1991). Using community adults as advocates or mentors for at-risk middle school students: A two-year evaluation of project RAISE. American Journal of Education, 99, 568-586.
32.
Nansel, T. R.
, Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bully behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285. Retrieved May 9, 2001 from jama.ama-assn.org/issues/v285n16/rfull/joc01746.html
33.
Nettles, S. M.
(1991). Community contributions to school outcomes of African-American students. Education and Urban Society, 24, 132-147.
34.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat 1425.
35.
Noguera, P. A.
(1995). Preventing and producing violence: A critical analysis of responses to school violence. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 189-212.
36.
Perry, K. E.
, & Weinstein, R. S. (1998). The social context of early schooling and children’s school adjustment. Educational Psychologist, 33, 177-194.
37.
Rothstein, R.
(2001, February 14). Lessons: A school district refuses to worship scores alone. The New York Times. Retrieved February 14, 2001, from www.nytimes.com/2001/02/14/national/14LESS.html
38.
Sanders, M. G.
(1996). School-family-community partnerships focused on school safety: The Baltimore example. Journal of Negro Education, 65, 369-374.
39.
Sanders, M. G.
(2001). The role of “community” in comprehensive school, family, and community partnership programs. Elementary School Journal, 102, 19-34.
40.
Sanders, M. G.
, & Harvey, A. (2000, April). Developing comprehensive programs of school, family, and community partnerships: The community perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
41.
Sheldon, S. B.
, & Epstein, J. L. (2001). Focus on math achievement: Effects of familyand community involvement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Anaheim, California.
42.
Simon, B. S. (2000). Predictors of high school and family partnerships and the influence of partnerships on student success. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
43.
Snyder, J.
, & Patterson, G. (1987). Family interaction and delinquent behavior. In H. C. Quay (Ed.), Handbook of juvenile delinquency (pp. 216-243). New York: JohnWiley.
44.
Taylor, L.
, & Adelman, H. S. (2000). Connecting schools, families, and communities. Professional School Counseling, 3, 298-307.
45.
Tosto, P.
(2002, May 7). Suspending very young can harm more than help. Pioneer Press,p.A1-A1.
46.
VanVoorhis, F. L. (2000). The effects of interactive (TIPS) homework on family involvement and science achievement of middle grade students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, Gainesville.
47.
Wilson, W. J.
(1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner-city, the underclass and public policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
