This study was designed to determine the effects of assigning attributes on teacher perceptions of labeled students. Regular and special education teachers were included in the study. Results indicated that the label condition significantly affected their perceptions of student academic behavior, and to a lesser degree, social behavior. Further, the assigned attribute did not alter the teacher perception. Implications of these results were discussed.
AloiaG., MaxwellJ., & AloiaS.Influence of a child's race and the EMR label on initial impressions of regular-classroom teachers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1981, 85, 619–623.
3.
BarberT., ClaverlyB., ForgioneA., McPeakeJ., ChavesJ., & BowenB.Five attempts to replicate the experimenter's bias effect. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1969, 33, 11–14.
4.
CopelandA., & WeissbrodC.Differences in attitudes toward sex-typed behavior of nonretarded and retarded children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976, 81, 280–288.
5.
DusekJ., & O'ConnellE.Teacher expectancy effects on the achievement test performance of elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1973, 65, 371–377.
6.
FoleyJ.Effect of labeling and teacher behavior on children's attitudes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1979, 83, 380–384.
7.
FosterG., & YsseldykeJ.Expectancy and halo effects as a result of artificially induced bias. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1976, 1, 37–45.
8.
FreemanS., & AlgozzineB.Social acceptability as a function of labels and assigned attributes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1980, 84, 589–595.
9.
GibbonsF., SawinL., & GibbonsB.Evaluations of mentally retarded persons: Sympathy or patronization?American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1979, 84, 124–131.
10.
GoodT., & BrophyJ.Behavioral expression of teacher attitudes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972, 63, 617–624.
11.
GottliebJ.Attitudes toward retarded children: Effects of labeling and academic performance. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 268–274.
12.
GottliebJ.Attitudes toward retarded children: Effects of labeling and behavioral aggressive-ness. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1975, 67, 581–585.
13.
GottliebJ.Mainstreaming: Fulfilling the promise?American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1981, 86, 115–126.
14.
HarrisR. J.A primer of multivariate statistics. New York: Academic Press, 1975.
15.
JacobsW.The effect of learning disability label on classroom teachers’ ability objectively to ob-serve and interpret child behaviors. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1978, 1, 50–55.
16.
KurtzP., HarrisonM., NeisworthJ., & JonesR.Influence of “mentally retarded” label on teachers’ nonverbal behavior toward preschool children. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977, 82, 204–206.
17.
MacMillanD., JonesR., & AloiaG.The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 241–261.
18.
SchurrK., TowneR., & JoinerL.Trends in self-concept of ability over 2 years of special class placement. Journal of Special Education, 1972, 6, 161–166.
19.
SeveranceL., & GasstromL.Effects of the label “mentally retarded” on causal explanations for success and failure outcomes. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977, 81, 547–555.
20.
SutherlandJ., & AlgozzineB.The learning disabled label as a biasing factor in the visual motor performance of normal children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1979, 12, 17–23.
