In summary, introductory MR texts by Blodgett (1971), Koch and Koch (1974), and Sellin (1979) were the easiest to read. They were also the most interesting. Results of this study should be interpreted with caution, particularly the human interest scores. Researchers in the future may wish to compare readability and human interest with frequency of use and student popularity. Information in these areas is not currently available.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaroffG. S.Mental retardation: Nature, cause, and management. New York: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, 1974.
DasJ. P., & BaineD.Mental retardation for special educators. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas, 1978.
7.
EdgertonR. B.Mental retardation. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1979.
8.
EhlersW. H., KrishefC. H., & ProtheroJ. C.An introduction to mental retardation: A programmed text. Columbus, Ohio: Charles C. Merrill Publishing Co., 1977.
9.
FleschR.The art of readability writing. New York: Harper & Row, 1949.
10.
FleschR.How to test readability. New York: Harper & Row, 1949.
11.
GillenB.Readability and human interest scores of thirty-four current introductory psychology texts. American Psychologist, 1973, 28, 1010–1011.
12.
HirshorenA., HuntJ. T., & KavaleK.Readability, human interest, and completeness of 15 special education survey texts. Journal of Special Education, 1976, 10, 233–236.
13.
HoffmanR. J., & VyhonskyR. J.Readability and human interest scores of thirty-six recently published introductory educational psychology texts. American Psychologist, 1975, 30, 790–792.
14.
IngallsR. P.Mental retardation: The changing outlook. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1978.
15.
JordanT. E.The mentally retarded (4th ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1976.
16.
KauffmanJ. M., & PayneJ. S.Mental retardation: Introduction and personal perspectives. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Co., 1975.
