The work activity center (WAC) has been severely criticized in recent times for its inability to provide clients with an adequate work component. The focus of this criticism is on the lack of quality and remunerative subcontracts and the inability of WAC to combine production and training to satisfactorily meet the developmental needs of the clients. This paper is an attempt to address these problems by proposing a new model which can be utilized by WAC. The model is based on the job module which is a work task utilized in training, curriculum development, and subcontract procurement. The goals of the model include the development of (a) a competent workforce, (b) a contract procurement, and (c) a training curriculum.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AsherJ. J., & SciarrinoJ. A.Realistic work sam- ple tests: A review. Personnel Psychology, 1974, 27, 519–533.
2.
BellamyT., HornerR., & InmanD. (Eds.). Ha- bilitation of severely and profoundly retarded adults: Reports from the specialized training program, (Vol. II). Eugene, Oregon: The University of Oregon Press, 1977.
3.
BellamyG. T., HornerR. H., & InmanD. P.Vocational habilitation of severely retarded adults. Baltimore: University Park Press, 1979.
4.
BerksonG., & Landesman-DwyerS.Behavioral research on severe and profound mental retar- dation (1955-1974). American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1977, 81, 428–454.
5.
BrolinD. E.Vocational preparation of retarded citi- zens. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill, 1976.
6.
CohenS. L., & PennerL. A.The rigors of pre- dictive validation: Some comments on “a job learning approach to performance prediction.”Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 595–600.
7.
CrossonJ.A technique for programming shel- tered workshop environments for severely re- tarded workers. American Journal of Mental De- ficiency, 1969, 73, 814–818.
8.
GoldM. W.Stimulus factors in skill training of the retarded on a complex assembly task: Ac- quisition, transfer and retention. American Jour- nal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 76, 517–526.
9.
GoldM. W.Research on the vocational habilitation of the retarded: The present, the future. In N. R. Ellis, (Ed.), International review of re- search in mental retardation, (Vol. 6). New York: Academic Press, 1973.
10.
GoldM. W.Task analysis of a complex assembly task by the retarded blind. Exceptional Children, 1976, 43 (2), 78–84.
11.
GordonM. E., & KleinmanL. S.The prediction of trainability using a work sample test and an aptitude test: A direct comparison. Personnel Psychology, 1976, 29, 243–253.
12.
Greenleigh Associates. The role of the sheltered work- shop in the rehabilitation of the severely handicapped. Washington, D.C.: Department of Health, Ed- ucation and Welfare, Rehabilitation Service Administration, 1975. (ERIC Document Repro- duction Service No. ED 117475).
13.
HardyR. E., & CullJ. G.Vocational evaluation for rehabilitation services. Springfield, Illinois: Charles Thomas Publishers, 1973.
14.
LadasP. G.Work sample learning rates of the mentally retarded trainers as indicators of pro- duction in a work-training center. Personnel and Guidance Journal, 1961, 39, 396–402.
15.
LevyS. M.The development of work skill training procedures for the assembly of printed cir- cuit boards by the severely handicapped. AAESPH Review, 1975, 1 (1), 1–10.
16.
LevyS. M.The debilitating effects of the habili- tation process. In C. L. Hansen & N. G. Haring, (Eds.), PDAS Monograph. Seattle, Washington: University of Seattle, 1980.
17.
MallasA. A.Current workshop practices: Strengths and weaknesses. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1976, 11, 338–341.
McCormickE.Job analysis methods and applications. New York: AMACOM, 1979.
20.
MountM. K., MuchinskyP. M., & HanserL. M.The predictive validity of a work sample: A lab- oratory study. Personnel Psychology, 1977, 30, 637–645.
21.
NeffW.Work and human behavior. New York: Al- dine-Atherton, 1968.
22.
PattersonC.Methods of assessing the vocational adjustment potential of the mentally handi- capped. Training School Bulletin, 1964, 61, 129–152.
23.
PomerantzD., & MarholinD.Vocational habil- itation: A time for change in existing service delivery systems. In E. Sontag, N. Certo, & J. Smith (Eds.), Educational programming for the se- verely and profoundly handicapped. Reston, Vir- ginia: Council for Exceptional Children, Division of Mental Retardation, 1977.
24.
PowerD. W., & MarinelliR. P.Normalization and the sheltered workshop. Rehabilitation Lit- erature, 1974, 35 (3), 66–72.
25.
PruittW.Basic assumptions underlying work sample theory. Journal of Rehabilitation, 1970, 36 (1), 24–26.
26.
SanlovskyR., ArthurG., & MannJ. (Eds.). Vo- cational evaluation and work adjustment. Auburn, Alabama: Materials and Information Center, Auburn University, 1971.
27.
SchmidtF. L., GreenthalA. L., HunterJ. E., BernerJ. G., & SeatonF. W.Job sample vs. paper-and-pencil trades and technical tests: Ad- verse impact and examinee attitudes. Personnel Psychology, 1977, 30, 187–197.
28.
SchreinerJ.Prediction of retarded adults’ work performance through components of general ability. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1978, 83, (1), 77–79.
29.
StanfieldJ. S.Graduation: What happens to the retarded child when he grows up?Exceptional Children, 1973, 39, 548–552.
30.
StoddenR. A., CasaleJ., & SchwartzS. E.Work evaluation and the mentally retarded: Review and recommendations. Mental Retardation, 1977, 15, 25–27.
31.
TateB. G., & BaroffG. S.Training the mildly retarded in the production of a complex prod- uct: A demonstration of work potential. Exceptional Children, 1967, 33, 405–408.
32.
TobiasJ., & GorelickJ.The effectiveness of the Purdue Pegboard in evaluation the work poten- tial of retarded adults. Training School Bulletin, 1960, 57, 94–103.
33.
TraceyW. R.Designing training and development systems. New York: American Management As- sociation, Inc., 1971.
34.
WolfensbergerW.Vocational preparation and occupation. In A. A. Baumeister (Ed.), Mental retardation. Chicago: Adline Press, 1967.
