A variety of factors has been shown to be influential in teacher-student relationships; both labels and behaviors have been investigated with regard to their biasing effects within special education. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the extent to which fourth grade children's ratings of a peer would be differentially effected by categorical labels and assigned attributes. An analysis of the results suggested that positive attributes produced favorable peer ratings when compared to neutral ones. The results are discussed with regard to implications for altering the differential effects often observed in teacher-pupil relationships.
AlgozzineB.The emotionally disturbed child: Disturbed or disturbing?Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1977, 5, 205–211.
3.
AlgozzineB., & MercerC. D.Labels and expectancies for handicapped children and youth. In SabatinoD. A. & MannL. (Eds.) Fourth Review of Special Education, in press.
4.
AlgozzineB., MercerC. D., CountermineT.The effects of labels and behavior on teacher expectations. Exceptional Children, 1977, 44, 131–132.
5.
BrophyJ., & GoodT.Teacher-student relationships: Causes and consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, 1974.
6.
BryanT. H., & BryanJ. H.Understanding learning disabilities. Port Washington, N.Y.: Alfred Publishing Co., 1975.
7.
CarterR. S.How invalid are marks assigned by teachers?Journal of Educational Psychology, 1952, 43, 218–228.
8.
CoatesB.White adult behavior toward black and white children. Child Development, 1972, 43, 143–154.
9.
DamicoS. B., & PurkeyW. W.Class clowns: A study of middle school students. American Educational Research Journal, 1978, 15, 391–398.
10.
DattaL., SchaeferE., & DavisM.Sex and scholastic aptitude as variables in teachers’ ratings of the adjustment and classroom behavior of Negro and other seventh-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1968, 59, 94–101.
11.
DionK., BerscheidE., & WalsterE.What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, 285–290.
12.
FarinaA., ThawJ., FelnerR. D., & HustB. E.Some interpersonal consequences of being labeled mentally ill or mentally retarded. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976, 80, 414–422.
13.
FosterG. G., SchmidtC., & SabatinoD. A.Teacher expectancies and the label “learning disabilities.”Journal of Learning Disabilities, 1976, 9, 58–61.
14.
FosterG. G., & YsseldykeJ. E.Expectancy and halo effects as a result of artificially induced teacher bias. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 1976, 1, 37–45.
15.
FosterG. G., YsseldykeJ. E., & ReeseJ.I wouldn't have seen it if I hadn't believed it. Exceptional Children, 1975, 42, 469–473.
16.
GoodchildsJ. D.Effects of being witty on position in social structure of a small group. Sociometry, 1959, 22, 261–272.
17.
GoodmanH., GottliebJ., & HarrisonR. H.Social acceptance of EMRs integrated into a nongraded elementary school. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1972, 76, 412–417.
18.
GottliebJ.Attitudes toward retarded children: Effects of labeling and academic performance. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 268–273.
19.
GottliebJ., & DavisJ. E.Social acceptance of EMR children during overt behavioral interactions. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1973, 78, 141–143.
20.
GottliebJ., & SipersteinG. N.Attitudes toward mentally retarded persons: Effects of attitude referent specificity. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1976, 80, 376–381.
21.
JacksonP., & LahaderneH.Inequalities of teacher-pupil contacts. Psychology in the Schools, 1967, 4, 204–211.
22.
JacobsW. R.The effect of the learning disability label on classroom teacher's ability objectively to observe and interpret child behavior. Learning Disability Quarterly, 1978, 1, 50–55.
23.
JonesR. A.Self-fulfilling prophecies. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers, 1976.
24.
LippettR., & GoldM.Classroom social structure as a mental health problem. Journal of Social Issues, 1959, 15, 40–49.
25.
MacMillanD. L., JonesR. L., & AloiaG. F.The mentally retarded label: A theoretical analysis and review of research. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1974, 79, 241–261.
26.
MeyerW., & ThompsonG.Sex differences in the distribution of teacher approval and disapproval among sixth grade children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1956, 47, 385–396.
27.
MooneyC., & AlgozzineB.A comparison of the disturbingness of LD and ED behaviors. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 1978, 6, 401–406.
28.
O'ConnellW. E.The social aspects of wit and humor. Journal of Social Psychology, 1969, 79, 183–187.
29.
RossM. B., & SalviaJ.Attractiveness as a biasing factor in teacher judgments. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 1975, 80, 96–98.
30.
RubovitzP., & MaehrM.Pygmalion black and white. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, 210–218.
31.
SalviaJ., ClarkG., & YsseldykeJ.Teacher retention of stereotypes of exceptionality. Exceptional Children, 1973, 40, 651–652.
32.
SalviaJ., SheareJ., & AlgozzineB.Facial attractiveness and personal social development. Journal of Abnormal Child Development, 1975, 3, 171–178.
