Abstract
The credibility of programed materials in arithmetic as an instructional technique with junior high mentally retarded pupils was investigated in a population sample from five school districts. The group of pupils using programed instruction achieved as well as the matched control group using a variety of conventional techniques in the classrooms of five experienced teachers. Neither group's pre- or posttest gains were significant though slight indications were found to favor the experimental group using programed instruction. Evidence was found to qualify programed instruction as a credible instructional technique with pupils similar to the population used for this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
