ArmstrongJ. R.The relationship of mathematics curriculum innovation presented through two methods and effects upon achievement as a function of learner ability. Final Report Vol. II, April, 1968, No. 7-E-109, U.S.O.E. (Mimeo)
2.
ArmstrongJ. R.Curricular and instructional factors affecting mathematical learning. Journal of Experimental Education, November, 1969.
3.
ArmstrongJ. R.Teaching: An ongoing process of assessing, selecting, developing, generalizing, applying and reassessing. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded, 1969, 4, 168–176.
4.
CawleyJ. F., & GoodmanJ. O.Arithmetical problem solving: A program demonstration by teachers of the mentally handicapped. Storrs, Connecticut: School of Education, The University of Connecticut, 1967. (Mimeo)
5.
GagneR. M., & ParadiseN. E.Abilities and learning sets in knowledge acquisitions. Psychological Monographs, 1961, 75 (4).
6.
HarrisL., BarrettC., & OttoW.Transfer effects of training intermediate grade pupils to adjust reading speed to reading purpose. Final Report, 1966, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Laboratory for Research in Basic Skills, Cooperative Research Project No. 3137, U.S.O.E. (Mimeo)
7.
HigginsC., & RuschR.Development and evaluation of auto-instructional programs in arithmetic for the educable mentally handicapped. Final Report, August, 1967, Albany Public Schools, Albany, New York, Project No. 2514, U.S.O.E. (Mimeo)
