The concept of popular epidemiology is updated by examining it as a form of citizen science and a type of social movement. As a citizen science, popular epidemiology is a lay way of knowing that is based in part on an appropriation of expert knowledge by non-experts. As a social movement, popular epidemiology is a mobilization of citizens around the goal of identifying and ameliorating environmental stressors and local illness patterns. The updated concept of popular epidemiology shows the important influences of the environmental justice movement and of critical epidemiology among professional epidemiologists. Case study materials are provided to illustrate arguments.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Balshem, M. (1993) Cancer in the Community: Class and Medical Authority. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
2.
Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3.
Belenky, M. , B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger and J. M. Tarule (1986) Women's Ways of Knowing: The Development of Self, Voice, and Mind. New York: Basic Books.
4.
Blocker, T. J. and D. Eckberg (1989) `Environmental Issues as Women's Issues: General Concerns and Local Hazards', Social Science Quarterly70: 586-593.
5.
Brown, P. (1987) Popular Epidemiology: Community Response to Toxic Waste Induced Disease in Woburn, Massachusetts and Other Sites', Science, Technology, and Human Values12(3-4): 76-85.
6.
Brown, P. (1992) `Toxic Waste Contamination and Popular Epidemiology: Lay and Professional Ways of Knowing', Journal of Health and Social Behavior33: 267-281.
7.
Brown, P. (1995a) `Naming and Framing: The Social Construction of Diagnosis and Treatment', Journal of Health and Social Behaviorextra issue: 34-52.
8.
Brown, P. (1995b) `Race, Class, and Environmental Health: A Review and Systematization of the Literature', Environmental Research69: 15-30.
9.
Brown, P. and F. Ferguson (1995) ` “Making A Big Stink”: Women's Work, Women's Relationships, and Toxic Waste Activism', Gender & Society9: 145-172.
10.
Brown, P. and S. Masterson-Allen (1994) `Citizen Action on Toxic Waste Contamination: A New Type of Social Movement', Society and Natural Resources7: 269-286.
11.
Brown, P. and E. J. Mikkelsen (1990) No Safe Place: Toxic Waste, Leukemia, and Community Action. Berkeley: University of California Press.
12.
Bullard, R. (1992) `Anatomy of Environmental Racism and the Environmental Justice Movement', in R. Bullard (ed.) Confronting Environmental Racism: Voices from the Grassroots, pp. 15-39. Boston, MA: South End Press.
13.
Couch, S. R. and J. S. Kroll-Smith (eds) (1991) Communities at Risk: Collective Responses to Technological Hazards. New York: Peter Lang.
14.
Edelstein, M. R. (1988) Contaminated Communities: The Social and Psychological Impacts of Residential Toxic Exposure. Boulder, CO: Westview.
15.
Erikson, K. (1994) A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community. New York: Norton.
16.
Goldstein, I. and M. Goldstein (1986) `The Broad Street Pump', in J. R. Goldsmith (ed.) Environmental Epidemiology, pp. 37-48. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
17.
Harr, J. (1995) A Civil Action. New York: Random House.
18.
Ibsen, H. (1951) Six Plays. New York: Modern Library.
19.
Kaplan, L. (1991) ` “No More than an Ordinary X-Ray”: A Study of the Hanford Nuclear Reservation and the Emergence of the Health Effects of Radiation as a Public Problem'. PhD dissertation, Heller School, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
20.
Krieg, E. J. (1995) `Toxic Wastes, Race, and Class: An Historical Interpretation of Greater Boston'. PhD dissertation, Department of Sociology, Northeastern University.
21.
Krieger, N. (1992) `The Making of Public Health Data: Paradigms, Politics, and Policy', Journal of Public Health Policy13: 412-427.
22.
Kroll-Smith, S. and H. H. Floyd (1997) Bodies in Protest: The Struggle Over Medical Knowledge. New York: New York University Press.
23.
Kuhn, T. (1963) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
24.
Laveist, T. (1992) `The Political Empowerment and Health Status of African Americans: Mapping a New Territory', American Journal of Sociology97: 1080-1095.
25.
Levine, A. (1982) Love Canal: Science, Politics, and People. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
26.
Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1990) `Center For Environmental Health Sciences at MIT', Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
27.
Maxwell, N. (1996) `Land Use, Demographics, and Cancer Incidence in Massachusetts Communities'. ScD dissertation, Boston University School of Public Health.
28.
Mohai, P. and B. Bryant (1992) `Environmental Racism: Reviewing the Evidence', in B. Bryant and P. Mohai (eds) Race and the Incidence of Environmental Hazards, pp. 162-176. Boulder, CO: Westview.
29.
Ozonoff, D. and L. Boden (1987) `Truth and Consequences: Health Agency Responses to Environmental Health Problems', Science, Technology, and Human Values12(3-4): 70-77.
30.
Paigen, B. (1982) `Controversy at Love Canal', Hastings Center Reports12(3): 29-37.
31.
Pellow, D. (1994) `Environmental Justice and Popular Epidemiology: Symbolic Politics and Hidden Transcripts', paper presented at Annual Meeting of the American Sociological Association, August, Los Angeles.
32.
Schwartz, S. (1994) `The Fallacy of the Ecological Fallacy: The Potential Misuse of a Concept and the Consequences', American Journal of Public Health84: 819-824.
33.
Szasz, A. (1994) Ecopopulism: Toxic Waste and the Movement for Environmental Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
Weed, D. L. (1995) `Epidemiology, the Humanities, and Public Health', American Journal of Public Health85: 914-918.
35.
Wing, S. (1994) `Limits of Epidemiology', Medicine and Global Survival1: 74-86.
