Both supply-side and demand-side factors are studied to explain heterogeneity in the motherhood wage penalty. Yet, how job attainment pathways mitigate or exacerbate the motherhood wage penalty is less known. Taking the case of the Chinese labour market, where social ties are frequently used for job attainment, this study examines how the motherhood wage penalty is moderated by different social tie use strategies. Employing panel data from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey and fixed-effects regression models, the study finds that the use of social ties in job attainment exacerbates the motherhood wage penalty. Social tie users experience a significant motherhood wage loss, whether strong ties or weak ties, whereas non-social tie users encounter fewer penalties. Robustness checks show the validity of the findings, indicating that Chinese mothers are doubly trapped in the networked labour market.
AbendrothAHuffmanMLTreasJ (2014) The parity penalty in life course perspective: Motherhood and occupational status in 13 European countries. American Sociological Review79(5): 993–1014.
2.
Amuedo-DorantesCKimmelJ (2005) The motherhood wage gap for women in the United States: The importance of college and fertility delay?Review of Economics of the Household3(1): 17–48.
3.
AndersonDJBinderMKrauseK (2003) The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. ILR Review56(2): 273–294.
4.
BenardSCorrellSJ (2010) Normative discrimination and the motherhood penalty. Gender & Society24(5): 616–646.
5.
BianY (1997) Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect ties, network bridges, and job searches in China. American Sociological Review62(3): 366–385.
6.
BianY (2019) Guanxi: How China Works. Cambridge: Polity Press.
7.
BianYHuangX (2015) Beyond the strength of social ties: Job search networks and entry-level wage in urban China. American Behavioral Scientist59(8): 961–976.
8.
BreuerKNiekenPSliwkaD (2013) Social ties and subjective performance evaluations: An empirical investigation. Review of Managerial Science7: 141–157.
9.
Bruk-LeeVNixonAESpectorPE (2013) An expanded typology of conflict at work: Task, relationship and non-task organizational conflict as social stressors. Work Stress27(4): 339–350.
10.
BudigMJ (2006) Gender, self-employment, and Earnings: The Interlocking Structures of Family and Professional Status: The Interlocking Structures of Family and Professional Status. Gender & Society20(6): 725–753.
11.
BudigMJEnglandP (2001) The wage penalty for motherhood. American Sociological Review66(2): 204–225.
12.
BudigMJHodgesMJ (2010) Differences in disadvantage: Variation in the motherhood penalty across white women’s earnings distribution. American Sociological Review75(5): 705–728.
13.
BudigMJMisraJBoeckmannI (2015) Work-family policy trade-offs for mothers? Unpacking the cross-national variation in motherhood earnings penalties. Work and Occupation43(2): 119–177.
14.
ChenFLiuGMairCA (2011) Intergenerational ties in context: Grandparents caring for grandchildren in China. Social Forces90(2): 571–594.
15.
ChengCZhouY (2024) Educational assortative mating and motherhood penalty in China. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility89: 100873.
16.
CheungCGuiY (2006) Job referral in China: The advantages of strong ties. Human Relations59(6): 847–872.
17.
ChuCYCXieYYuRR (2011) Coresidence with elderly parents: A comparative study of southeast China and Taiwan. Journal of Marriage and Family73(1): 120–135.
18.
CongZSilversteinM (2008) Intergenerational support and depression among elders in rural China: Do daughters-in-law matter?Journal of Marriage and Family70(3): 599–612.
19.
CorrellSJBenardSPaikI (2007) Getting a job: Is there a motherhood penalty?American Journal of Sociology112(5): 1297–1339.
20.
Cukrowska-TorzewskaEMatysiakA (2020) The motherhood wage penalty: A meta-analysis. Social Science Research88/89: 102416.
21.
DeguilhemTBerrouJPCombarnousF (2019) Using your ties to get a worse job? The differential effects of social networks on quality of employment in Colombia. Review of Social Economy77(4): 493–522.
22.
DiasFAChanceJBuchananA (2020) The motherhood penalty and the fatherhood premium in employment during COVID-19: Evidence from the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility69: 100542.
23.
DorenC (2019) Which mothers pay a higher price? Education differences in motherhood wage penalties by parity and fertility timing. Sociological Science6: 684–709.
24.
Dos SantosMDTaugourdeauE (2021) Social network, unemployment and sector trap: A theoretical model explaining the case study of Portuguese immigrants in the French labor market. Mathematical Social Science112: 61–71.
25.
DuS (2023) Childbearing risk, job sectors, and the motherhood wage penalty. Population Research and Policy Review42(2): 1–19.
26.
EllwardtLLabiancaGJWittekR (2012) Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? A social network perspective on workplace gossip. Social Networks34: 193–205.
27.
EnglandPBearakJBudigMJ, et al. (2016) Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty?American Sociological Review81(6): 1161–1189.
28.
FlorianSM (2018) Racial variation in the effect of motherhood on women’s employment: Temporary or enduring effect?Social Science Research73: 80–91.
29.
GaoKTianZ (2023) The effect of motherhood on wages: Are women’s wage penalties due to lack of career aspirations?Applied Economics55(54): 6410–6424.
30.
GlassCFodorE (2018) Managing motherhood: Job context and employer bias. Work and Occupations45(2): 202–234.
31.
GlauberR (2007) Marriage and the motherhood wage penalty among African Americans, Hispanics, and Whites. Journal of Marriage and Family69(4): 951–961.
32.
GlauberR (2012) Women’s work and working conditions: Are mothers compensated for lost wages?Work and Occupations39(2): 115–138.
33.
GoughMNoonanM (2013) A review of the motherhood wage penalty in the United States. Sociology Compass7(4): 328–342.
34.
GranovetterMS (1973) The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology78(6): 1360–1380.
35.
HuangX (2008) Guanxi networks and job searches in China’s emerging labour market: A qualitative investigation. Work, Employment and Society22(3): 467–484.
36.
IshizukaP (2021) The motherhood penalty in context: Assessing discrimination in a polarized labor market. Demography58(4): 1275–1300.
37.
IshizukaPMusickK (2021) Occupational inflexibility and women’s employment during the transition to parenthood. Demography58(4): 1249–1274.
38.
JeeEMisraJMurray-CloseM (2019) Motherhood penalties in the U.S., 1986–2014. Journal of Marriage and Family81(2): 434–449.
39.
JiaNDongXY (2013) Economic transition and the motherhood wage penalty in urban China: Investigation using panel data. Cambridge Journal of Economics37(4): 819–843.
40.
KillewaldAGoughM (2013) Does specialization explain marriage penalties and premiums?American Sociological Review78(3): 477–502.
41.
KmecJA (2011) Are motherhood penalties and fatherhood bonuses warranted? Comparing pro-work behaviors and conditions of mothers, fathers, and non-parents. Social Science Research40(2): 444–459.
42.
KongSDongH (2024) The doubly disadvantaged: The motherhood penalty for internal migrants in China. Journal of Marriage and Family86(1): 199–218.
43.
MellewigtTMadhokAWeibelA (2007) Trust and formal contracts in interorganizational relationships – substitutes and complements. Managerial and Decision Economics28(8): 833–847.
44.
MengLZhangYBenZ (2023) The motherhood penalty in China: Magnitudes, trends, and the role of grandparenting. Journal of Comparative Economics51(1): 105–132.
45.
MillerAR (2011) The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics24(3): 1071–1100.
46.
NiePYanW (2021) Effects of social networks on job attainment and match quality: Evidence from the China Labor-force Dynamics Survey. Institute of Labor Economics, Discussion paper series, 14504, Institute of Labor Economics, Bonn.
47.
ObukhovaE (2012) Motivation vs. relevance: Using strong ties to find a job in urban China. Social Science Research41(3): 570–580.
48.
ObukhovaEZhangL (2017) Social capital and job search in urban China: The strength-of-strong-ties hypothesis revisited. Chinese Sociological Review49(4): 340–361.
49.
OfferS (2012) The burden of reciprocity: Processes of exclusion and withdrawal from personal networks among low-income families. Current Sociology60: 788–805.
50.
OfferS (2021) Negative social ties: Prevalence and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology47: 177–196.
51.
OfferSFischerCS (2018) Difficult people: Who is perceived to be demanding in personal networks and why are they there?American Sociological Review83(1): 111–142.
52.
PailheASolazA (2019) Is there a wage cost for employees in family-friendly workplaces? The effect of different employer policies. Gender, Work & Organization26(5): 688–721.
53.
RaymoJMParkHXieY, et al. (2015) Marriage and family in East Asia: Continuity and change. Annual Review of Sociology41: 471–492.
54.
ShenC (2022) Widening inequality: The evolution of the motherhood penalty in China (1989-2015). Chinese Journal of Sociology8(4): 499–533.
55.
ShenYJiangL (2020) Labor market outcomes of professional women with two children after the one-child policy in China. Journal of Social Issues76(3): 632–658.
56.
SmithSS (2000) Mobilizing social resources: Race, ethnic, and gender differences in social capital and persisting wage inequalities. Sociological Quarterly41(4): 509–537.
57.
SongL (2012) Raising network resources while raising children? Access to social capital by parenthood status, gender, and marital status. Social Networks34(2): 241–252.
58.
SongL (2020) Social capital, social cost, and relational culture in three societies. Social Psychology Quarterly83(4): 443–462.
59.
SongLPettisPJ (2020) Does whom you know in the status hierarchy prevent or trigger health limitation? institutional embeddedness of social capital and social cost theories in three societies. Social Science & Medicine257: 11959.
60.
SongLPettisPJChenY, et al. (2021) Social cost and health: The downside of social relationships and social networks. Journal of Health and Social Behavior62(3): 371–387.
61.
StaffJMortimerJT (2012) Explaining the motherhood wage penalty during the early occupational career. Demography49(1): 1–21.
62.
TegegneMA (2015) Immigrants’ social capital and labor market performance: The effect of social ties on earnings and occupational prestige. Social Science Quarterly96(6): 1396–1410.
63.
TianFFLinN (2016) Weak ties, strong ties, and job mobility in urban China: 1978–2008. Social Networks: 44: 117–129.
64.
TianFFLiuX (2018) Gendered double embeddedness: Finding jobs through networks in the Chinese labor market. Social Networks52: 28–36.
65.
Van WinkleZFasangAE (2020) Parenthood wage gaps across the life course: A comparison by gender and race. Journal of Marriage and Family82(5): 1515–1533.
66.
Villalonga-OlivesEKawachiI (2017) The dark side of social capital: A systematic review of the negative health effects of social capital. Social Science & Medicine194: 105–127.
67.
WildeETBatchelderLEllwoodD (2010) The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels. NBER working paper, 16582, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.
68.
XiongALiHWestlundH, et al. (2017) Social networks, job satisfaction and job searching behavior in the Chinese labor market. China Economic Review43: 1–15.
69.
XuQ (2023) From fatherhood premium to motherhood penalty: Trends in the fertility effects on men’s and women’s wage in China (1989–2015). Journal of Chinese Sociology10: 20.
70.
YakubovichV (2005) Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review70(3): 408–421.
71.
YuJXieY (2018) Motherhood penalties and living arrangements in China. Journal of Marriage and Family80(5): 1067–1086.
72.
YuWHKuoJCL (2017) The motherhood wage penalty by work conditions: How do occupational characteristics hinder or empower mothers?American Sociological Review82(4): 744–769.
73.
ZhangYHannumEWangM (2008) Gender-based employment and income differences in urban China: Considering the contributions of marriage and parenthood. Social Forces86(4): 1529–1560.
74.
ZhaoMJinY (2020) Migrant workers in Beijing: How hometown ties affect economic outcomes. Work, Employment and Society34(5): 789–808.
75.
ZhengQQiuZYangW (2024) The shifting motherhood penalty and fatherhood premium in China’s gig economy: Impact of parental status on income changes. International Labour Review163(2): 173–197.
76.
ZhouY (2020) ‘Good mothers work’: How maternal employment shapes women’s expectation of work and family in contemporary urban China. Journal of Social Issues76(3): 659–680.
