Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Spanish

French

This article examines the society/nature distinction within sociological and anthropological discourse, particularly concerning Luhmann’s social systems theory. The increasing urgency surrounding climate change and the complexities of the Anthropocene has necessitated reconsidering this dichotomy, often seen as reinforcing sociocentrism. Social systems theory’s emphasis on the system/environment distinction has overlooked the importance of the environment, relegating it to a mere backdrop for societal functioning. By engaging with three critical perspectives – Ontological Relativism, Transcendent Connectionism, and Circular Cosmologism – we emphasize both the contributions and shortcomings of social systems theory in this regard. We then propose a synthesis of these insights through a systemic enactive approach, suggesting that its theoretical framework can enhance our understanding of the society/nature distinction within social systems theory. Ultimately, this article aims to open new research avenues that address the intricate relationship between social systems and their natural environments.

Keywords

Guiding distinctions social systems theory society/nature system/environment systemic enactive approach

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alexander

Giesen

Münch

, et al. (eds) (1987) The Micro-Macro Link. Berkeley; Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.

Archer

(1995) Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barandiaran

(2017) Autonomy and enactivism: Towards a theory of sensorimotor autonomous agency. Topoi 36: 409–430.

Barandiaran

Egbert

(2014) Norm-establishing and norm-following in autonomous agency. Artificial Life 20(1): 5–28.

Barandiaran

Di Paolo

Rohde

(2009) Defining agency: Individuality, normativity, asymmetry, and spatio-temporality in action. Adaptive Behavior 17(5): 367–386.

Barrett

(2017) The normative turn in enactive theory: An examination of its roots and implications. Topoi 36: 431–443.

Beck

(1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications.

Becker

Jahn

(eds) (2006) Soziale Ökologie: Grundzüge einer Wissenschaft von den gesellschaftlichen Naturverhältnissen. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Bhaskar

(1975) A Realist Theory of Science. New York: Routledge.

10.

Cadenas

(2015) The reality of ontologies in Luhmann’s work. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 210–211.

11.

Cadenas

(2019) The unity of (social systems) science: The legacy of Bertalanffy. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 36(3): 274–280.

12.

Cadenas

(2024) How does the body participate in communications? Action, agency, and social systems. Cybernetics & Human Knowing 31(1–2): 11–20.

13.

Cadenas

Arnold

(2015) The autopoiesis of social systems and its criticisms. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 169–176.

14.

Callon

Law

(1995) Agency and the hybrid collectif. South Atlantic Quarterly 94: 481–450.

15.

Clark

Chalmers

(1998) The extended mind. Analysis 58(1): 7–19.

16.

Comte

(1848) Discours sur l’ensemble du positivisme. Paris: La librairie scientifique-industrielle de Mme Vve Mathias.

17.

Demeritt

(2002) What is the ‘social construction of nature’? A typology and sympathetic critique. Progress in Human Geography 26(6): 767–790.

18.

Descola

(2013) Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

19.

Di Paolo

(1997) An investigation into the evolution of communication. Adaptive Behavior 6(2): 285–324.

20.

Di Paolo

(2023) F/acts ways of enactive worldmaking. Journal of Consciousness Studies 30(11–12): 159–189.

21.

Durkheim

(1893) De La Division Du Travail Social. Étude Sur L’organisation Des Sociétés Supéhieures. Paris: Felix Alcan.

22.

Eisenstadt

Helle

(1985) Macro-Sociological Theory: Perspectives on Sociological Theory. Volume 1. London: Sage Publications.

23.

Elder-Vass

(2007) Luhmann and emergentism: Competing paradigms for social systems theory? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37(4): 408–432.

24.

Elverfeldt

Keiler

(2008) Offene systeme und ihre umwelt – Systemperspektiven in der geomorphologie. In: Egner

Ratter

Dikau

(eds) Umwelt als System – System als Umwelt. Systemtheorien auf dem Prüfstand. München: Oekom, pp. 75–102.

25.

Esposito

(2022) Artificial Communication: How Algorithms Produce Social Intelligence. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

26.

Ferraris

(2014) Manifesto of New Realism. New York: State University of New York Press.

27.

Freudenburg

Frickel

Gramling

(1995) Beyond the nature/society divide: Learning to think about a mountain. Sociological Forum 10(3): 361–392.

28.

Froese

(2011) From second-order cybernetics to enactive cognitive science: Varela’s turn from epistemology to phenomenology. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 28(6): 631–645.

29.

Froese

Di Paolo

(2011) The enactive approach: Theoretical sketches from cell to society. Pragmatics and Cognition 19(1): 1–36.

30.

Froese

Sykes

(2023) The pragmatics, embodiment, and efficacy of lived experience assessing the core tenets of Varela’s neurophenomenology. Journal of Consciousness Studies 30(11–12): 190–213.

31.

Gabriel

(2017) I am Not a Brain: Philosophy of Mind for the 21St Century. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

32.

Goldman

Schurman

(2000) Closing the ‘great divide’: New social theory on society and nature. Annual Review of Sociology 26: 563–584.

33.

Groß

(2001) Die Natur der Gesellschaft: Eine Geschichte der Umweltsoziologie. Weinheim: Juventa.

34.

Groß

(2006) Natur. Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag.

35.

Haraway

(2016) Staying With the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

36.

Harman

(2010) Towards Speculative Realism: Essays and Lectures. London: John Hunt Publishing.

37.

Helle

Eisenstadt

(1985) Micro-Sociological Theory: Perspectives on Sociological Theory. Volume 2. London: Sage Publications.

38.

Heras-Escribano

Martínez Moreno

(2024) The emergence of ur-intentionality: An ecological proposal. Philosophies 9: 54.

39.

Holbraad

Pedersen

(2017) The Ontological Turn: An Anthropological Exposition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

40.

Hui

(2024) Machine and ecology. In: Hui

(ed.) Cybernetics for the 21St Century. Vol. 1: Epistemological Reconstruction. Hong Kong, China: Hanart Press, pp. 43–66.

41.

Hutto

(2005) Knowing what? Radical versus conservative enactivism. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4: 389–405.

42.

Ingold

(2018) Anthropology: Why It Matters. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

43.

Kaczmarczyk

(2025) The reality of environment reimagined: Niklas Luhmann and the new ecological paradigm. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 42(2): 327–337.

44.

Kraemer

(2008) Die soziale konstitution der umwelt. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

45.

Kropp

(2002) Natur. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

46.

LaCour

(2006) The concept of environment in systems theory. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 13(2): 41–55.

47.

Latour

(1993) We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

48.

Latour

(2005) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

49.

Lippuner

(2008) Die Abhängigkeit unabhängiger Systeme. Zur strukturellen Kopplung von Gesellschaft und Umwelt. In: Egner

Ratter

Dikau

(eds) Umwelt als System – System als Umwelt. Systemtheorien auf dem Prüfstand. München: Oekom, pp. 103–117.

50.

Lovelock

(1979) Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

51.

Luhmann

(1976) Generalized media and the problem of contingency. In: Loubser

Baum

Effrat

Meyer Lidz

(eds) Explorations in General Theory in Social Science: Essays in Honor of Talcott Parsons. Volume 2. New York: The Free Press, pp. 507–532.

52.

Luhmann

(1981) The improbability of communication. International Social Science Journal 32(1): 122–131.

53.

Luhmann

(1987) ‘Distinctions directrices’ Über Codierung von Semantiken und Systemen. In: Luhmann N (ed.) Soziologische Aufklärung 4. Beiträge Zur Funktionalen Differenzierung Der Gesellschaft. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 13–31.

54.

Luhmann

(1989) Ecological Communication. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

55.

Luhmann

(1992a) What is communication? Communication Theory 2: 251–259.

56.

Luhmann

(1992b) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

57.

Luhmann

(1995) Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

58.

Luhmann

(2002) Risk: A Sociological Theory. New York: Routledge.

59.

Luhmann

(2004) Law as a Social System. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

60.

Luhmann

(2012) Theory of Society, Volume 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

61.

Luhmann

(2013) Theory of Society, Volume 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

62.

Luhmann

(2017) Trust and Power. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

63.

McMillen

Levin

(2024) Collective intelligence: A unifying concept for integrating biology across scales and substrates. Communications Biology 7: 378.

64.

Margulis

Sagan

(1997) Microcosm: Four Billion Years of Microbial Evolution. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

65.

Maturana

(1995) La Realidad ¿Objetiva O Construida? Fundamentos Biológicos De La Realidad. Vol. 1. Barcelona, México DF, Guadalajara: Anthropos, Universidad iberoamericana, ITESO.

66.

Maturana

(2015) What is sociology? Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 176–179.

67.

Maturana

Varela

(1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

68.

Matuszek

(2015) Ontology, reality and construction in Niklas Luhmann’s theory. Constructivist Foundations 10(2): 203–210.

69.

Meillassoux

(2010) After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. London: Continuum.

70.

Metzner

(1993) Probleme Sozio-okologischer Systemtheorie: Natur Und Gesellschaft in Der Soziologie Luhmanns. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

71.

Parsons

(1951) The Social System. New York: The Free Press.

72.

Parsons

Shils

(eds) (1951) Toward a General Theory of Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

73.

Soper

(1995) What is Nature? Culture, Politics, and the Non-human. Cambridge: Blackwell.

74.

Spencer–Brown

(1979) Laws of Form. New York: E.P. Dutton.

75.

Tække

(2024) From media evolution to the Anthropocene: Unpacking sociotechnical autopoiesis. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 42(2): 383–395.

76.

Thyssen

(2006) The environment in systems theory: Response to anders la cour. Cybernetics and Human Knowing 13(2): 59–61.

77.

Tononi

(2004) An information integration theory of consciousness. BMC Neuroscience 5: 42.

78.

Varela

(1992) Autopoiesis and a biology of intentionality. In: McMullin

(ed.) Proceedings of the Workshop ‘Autopoiesis and Perception’. Dublin: Dublin City University, pp. 4–14.

79.

Varela

Thompson

Rosch

(1991) The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

80.

Villalobos

Ward

(2015) Living systems: Autonomy, autopoiesis and enaction. Philosophy and Technology 28: 225–239.

81.

Viveiros de Castro

(2004) Exchanging perspectives: The transformation of objects into subjects in Amerindian ontologies. Common Knowledge 10(3): 463–484.

82.

Von Foerster

(1984) Observing Systems. Seaside, CA: Intersystems Publications.

83.

Weber

(1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

84.

Weber

Varela

(2002) Life after Kant: Natural purposes and the autopoietic foundations of biological individuality. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 1: 97–125.

Society/nature: Enactive perspectives for social systems theory

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References