Temporary protection status shapes the aspirations of its holders. It limits their future perspectives; however, this does not mean that it abolishes their agency. Previous research on temporary protection status schemes using a primarily transnational perspective has focused on how temporary protection status visa holders experience ‘limbo’ or ‘permanent temporariness’ but, by neglecting class, tended to overlook what happens to their position in the economy of a given country. Based on biographical interviews and focus groups with female temporary protection status visa holders from Ukraine in Czechia and Slovakia, this study asks how they perceived their agency and what position they were looking for and finding for themselves in the labour market. The findings highlighted the subtlety of the factors that influenced female visa holders’ aspirations. Crucial was time both as a resource and as the main dimension of agency, which predetermined relative power over the terms and conditions of employment. Hence, rather than focusing on how temporary protection status shapes identity at different scales, therefore, the paper suggests to study how it functions more like a filter that distributes temporary protection status visa holders according to the needs of a country’s division of labour, paying attention to the very subtle factors that underpin this selection.
AignerPBešićAKubiciel-LodzińskaS, et al. (2024) The drivers of deskilling: Comparing highly skilled Ukrainian refugee women in Austria and Poland. International Migration. Epub ahead of print 19 December. DOI: 10.1111/imig.13363.
2.
AlbertiGSacchettoD (2024) The Politics of Migrant Labour: Exit, Voice, and Social Reproduction (Understanding Work and Employment Relations). Bristol: Bristol University Press.
3.
AltenriedMBojadžijevMHöflerL, et al. (2018) Arbeit, migration und Logistik. Movements4(2): 35–55.
4.
AndersonB (2010) Migration, immigration controls and the fashioning of precarious workers. Work, Employment and Society24(2): 300–317.
5.
AndersonB (2013) Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control, 1st edn. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
ApitzschUInowlockiL (2023) Reconstructing biographical knowledge: Biographical policy evaluation toward a structural understanding of transnational migration. Current Sociology71(4): 683–701.
7.
AppaduraiA (2009) The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In: RaoVKRVWaltonM (eds) Culture and Public Action. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp.59–84.
8.
AronowitzS (2003) How Class Works: Power and Social Movement. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
BaileyAJWrightRAMountzA, et al. (2002) (Re)producing Salvadoran transnational geographies. The Annals of the Association of American Geographers92(1): 125–144.
10.
BertiMSimpsonAV (2021) The dark side of organizational paradoxes: The dynamics of disempowerment. Academy of Management Review46(2): 252–274.
11.
BoeseMMoranAMallmanM (2022) Re-examining social mobility: Migrants’ relationally, temporally, and spatially embedded mobility trajectories. Sociology56(2): 351–368.
12.
BojadžijevMKarakayaliS (2007) Autonomie der Migration. 10 Thesen zu einer Methode. In: TRANSIT MIGRATION Forschungsgruppe (ed.) Kultur Und Soziale Praxis, 2nd edn.Bielefeld: transcript Verlag, pp.203–210.
13.
ÇağlarA (2016) Still ‘migrants’ after all those years: Foundational mobilities, temporal frames and emplacement of migrants. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(6): 952–969.
14.
CarstensenAL (2023) The chronos of class conflict. The relevance of the temporal dimension in conflicts related to labour migration. The Economic and Labour Relations Review34(3): 413–425.
15.
CleggSR (2002) General introduction. In: CleggSR (ed.) Management and Organization Paradoxes. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing, pp.1–10.
16.
Czech Statistical Office (2022) Households by Number of Dependent Children, Families by Type: B/ CONSUMPTION EXPENDITURE Groups – Annual Averages per Capita in CZK, Structure (%). Available at: https://www.czso.cz/documents/10180/189719219/1600662342.pdf
DucuVLeverJJRoneJ, et al. (2024) Beyond ‘those who leave and those who stay’: The simultaneous impacts of co-agency in migration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies50(17): 4253–4278.
22.
EmirbayerMMischeA (1998) What is agency?American Journal of Sociology103(4): 962–1023.
23.
ErelU (2010) Migrating cultural capital: Bourdieu in migration studies. Sociology44(4): 642–660.
24.
FudgeJ (2012) Precarious migrant status and precarious employment: The paradox of international rights for migrant workers. Comparative Labour Law and Policy Journal34(1): 95–132.
25.
GorbachDPolshchykovaYRyabchukA (2024) Elusive privilege: Class, race and gender in Ukrainian war migrants’ (un)employment in France. Dialectical Anthropology. Epub ahead of print 25 November. DOI: 10.1007/s10624-024-09754-8.
26.
GriffithsMRogersAAndersonB (2013) Migration, time and temporalities: Review and prospect. Research Resources Paper, March. Oxford: Centre on Migration, Policy and Society (COMPAS).
27.
HábelBVeselkováM (2022) Prácu si našlo už 13 % odídencov, 40 % pozícií obsadených odídencami však vyžaduje len základné vzdelanie [13% of refugees have already found a job, but 40% of positions filled by refugees require only primary education]. Commentary, April. Prague: Ministry of Labour, Social Affairs and Family SR, April.
28.
HercogMSandozL (2018) Highly skilled or highly wanted migrants? Conceptualizations, Policy designs and implementations of high-skilled migration policies. Migration Letters15(4): 453–460.
29.
HuntL (2008) Women asylum seekers and refugees: Opportunities, constraints and the role of agency. Social Policy and Society7(3): 281–292.
30.
JolyD (1998) Temporary protection within the framework of a New European asylum regime. The International Journal of Human Rights2(3): 49–76.
31.
KaraçayAB (2023) Temporary protection regimes in Turkey and Germany: Comparing Bosnian, Syrian and Ukrainian refugee protection regimes. İmgelem7(13): 561–586.
32.
KhondkerHH (2018) Class, identity, and insecurity: Bangladeshi temporary migrants in the United Arab Emirates. Current Sociology66(2): 257–272.
Liu-FarrerGShireK (2021) Who are the fittest? The question of skills in national employment systems in an age of global labour mobility. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies47(10): 2305–2322.
35.
MijićAParzerMTkalichO, et al. (2024) Experiencing forced migration: Challenges of arriving after displacement from Ukraine. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies50: 3396–3414.
MitrićD (2013) In a castle between the Earth and the sky: Bosnian refugees’ narratives of exile under the German Duldung temporary protection visa regime 1992–1998. PhD Thesis, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
40.
MoretJ (2016) Cross-border mobility, transnationality and ethnicity as resources: European Somalis’ post-migration mobility practices. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies42(9): 1455–1472.
41.
MountzAWrightRMiyaresI, et al. (2002) Lives in limbo: Temporary Protected Status and immigrant identities. Global Networks2(4): 335–356.
42.
NohlA-MSchittenhelmKSchmidtkeO, et al. (2014) Work in Transition: Cultural Capital and Highly Skilled Migrants’ Passages into the Labour Market. Toronto, ON, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
PutnamLLFairhurstGTBanghartS (2016) Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals10(1): 65–171.
45.
RyeJF (2019) Transnational spaces of class: International migrants’ multilocal, inconsistent and instable class positions. Current Sociology67(1): 27–46.
46.
ŠafářováKKavanováMŠkvrňákM, et al. (2023) Integrace uprchlíků na trhu práce a v bydlení – 6. vlna výzkumu Hlas Ukrajinců – červen 2023 [Refugee integration in the labour market and housing: 6th wave of the Voice of Ukrainians survey – June 2023]. Prague: PAQ Research. Available at: https://www.paqresearch.cz/content/files/2023/10/PAQ_Hlas_Ukrajincu_Prace_bydleni_FINAL.pdf (accessed 21 February 2025).
47.
SayadA (2006) L’immigration ou les paradoxes de l’alterité. 1. L’illusion du provisoire. Paris, France: Raisons d’Agir.
48.
SchieckoffB (2024) The labour market entry of immigrant women in Germany: Disentangling the determinants of labour force participation. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies50(20): 5167–5192.
49.
SeimJMcCarthyMA (2023) Classes without labor: Three critiques of Bourdieu. Critical Sociology. Epub ahead of print 25 September. DOI: 10.1177/089692052312008.
50.
SimmelinkJ (2011) Temporary citizens: U.S. immigration law and Liberian refugees. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies9(4): 327–344.
51.
StillJ (2010) Derrida and Hospitality: Theory and Practice. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
52.
StraussKMcGrathS (2017) Temporary migration, precarious employment and unfree labour relations: Exploring the ‘continuum of exploitation’ in Canada’s Temporary Foreign Worker Program. Geoforum78: 199–208.
53.
Van KooyJBowmanD (2019) ‘Surrounded with so much uncertainty’: Asylum seekers and manufactured precarity in Australia. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies45(5): 693–710.
YeohBSA (2006) Bifurcated labour: The unequal incorporation of transmigrants in Singapore. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie97(1): 26–37.
56.
Yuval-DavisN (2013) A situated intersectional everyday approach to the study of bordering. Euroborderscapes Working paper no. 2. Brussels: European Commission.
