Sociology has been described as a ‘third culture’ between science and literature. The distinctions between different orientations in sociological writing have been studied primarily through their non-textual manifestations (publication genres or venues, methodologies used, scientometric indicators, etc.). Our knowledge of how the science–literature boundary relates to the rhetorical composition of sociological texts therefore remains limited. We mixed a bespoke corpus of Czech sociological articles with a corpus of Czech short fiction to straightforwardly account for the relationship between sociology and literature. Unsupervised classification based on the distribution of most frequent verbs yielded two categories of sociological articles. Each cluster exhibited significant association with non-textual variables. Articles less similar to literature were associated with higher rates of co-authorship, citation counts, and number of women as first authors. Both clusters also displayed clear semantic differences. The signal from literary works increased variance in the textual feature space and subsequent pseudo-experimental validation confirmed its indispensability for the discovery of the association between the rhetorical pattern of verbs usage and non-textual variables related to sociological articles.
AbbottAD (2001) Chaos of Disciplines. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2.
AbbottADBarmanE (1997) Sequence comparison via alignment and Gibbs sampling: A formal analysis of the emergence of the modern sociological article. Sociological Methodology27(1): 47–87.
3.
AbendGPetreCSauderM (2013) Styles of causal thought: An empirical investigation. American Journal of Sociology119(3): 602–654.
4.
AdlerPAAdlerP (2008) Of rhetoric and representation: The four faces of ethnography. Sociological Quarterly49(1): 1–30.
5.
AkbaritabarASquazzoniF (2021) Gender patterns of publication in top sociological journals. Science, Technology, & Human Values46: 555–576.
6.
BabchukNKeithBPetersG (1999) Collaboration in sociology and other scientific disciplines: A comparative trend analysis of scholarship in the social, physical, and mathematical sciences. The American Sociologist30(3): 5–21.
7.
BaslJMunichDSidorkinO (2009) Publication productivity of Czech sociology in scientific journals within the last decade. wp392. Prague: The Center for Economic Research and Graduate Education – Economics Institute.
8.
BazermanC (1988) Shaping Written Knowledge: The Genre and Activity of the Experimental Article in Science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
9.
BearmanP (2018) Notes for ‘Heuristics of discovery’. Sociologica12(1): 13–19.
10.
BertinMAtanassovaISugimotoCR, et al. (2016) The linguistic patterns and rhetorical structure of citation context: An approach using N-grams. Scientometrics109(3): 1417–1434.
11.
BlochJ (2010) A concordance-based study of the use of reporting verbs as rhetorical devices in academic papers. Journal of Writing Research2(2): 219–244.
12.
BornmannLDanielH-D (2008) What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation64(1): 45–80.
13.
BourdieuP (1988) Homo Academicus. Cambridge: Polity Press.
14.
CamicCGrossNLamontM (eds) (2011) Social Knowledge in the Making. Chicago, IL; London: University of Chicago Press.
15.
ClemensESPowellWWMcIlwaineK, et al. (1995) Careers in print: Books, journals, and scholarly reputations. American Journal of Sociology101(2): 433–494.
16.
DemarestBSugimotoCR (2015) Argue, observe, assess: Measuring disciplinary identities and differences through socio-epistemic discourse. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology66(7): 1374–1387.
17.
DionMLSumnerJLMitchellSM (2018) Gendered citation patterns across political science and social science methodology fields. Political Analysis26(3): 312–327.
18.
EvansEDGomezCJMcFarlandDA (2016) Measuring paradigmaticness of disciplines using text. Sociological Science3: 757–778.
19.
FalakmasirMHAshleyKD (2017) Utilizing vector space models for identifying legal factors from text. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications302: 183–192.
20.
FraserM (2009) Experiencing sociology. European Journal of Social Theory12(1): 63–81.
21.
FullerS (1991) Disciplinary boundaries and the rhetoric of the social sciences. Poetics Today12(2): 301–325.
22.
GierynTF (1983) Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review48(6): 781–795.
23.
GrantLWardKBRongXL (1987) Is there an association between gender and methods in sociological research?American Sociological Review52(6): 856–862.
24.
GrossAG (2006) Starring the Text: The Place of Rhetoric in Science Studies. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
25.
GrossAGHarmonJEReidyMS (2002) Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26.
HargensLL (2000) Using the literature: Reference networks, reference contexts, and the social structure of scholarship. American Sociological Review65(6): 846–865.
27.
HenriksenD (2016) The rise in co-authorship in the social sciences (1980–2013). Scientometrics107(2): 455–476.
28.
HicksD (2004) The four literatures of social science. In: MoedHFGlänzelWSchmochU (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 473–496.
29.
HladíkR (2018) Czech Sociological Review 1993–2016. Distributed by LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11372/LRT-2703
30.
HunterLLeaheyE (2008) Collaborative research in sociology: Trends and contributing factors. The American Sociologist39(4): 290–306.
31.
HurHAndalibMAMaurerJA, et al. (2017) Recent trends in the U.S. Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (BSSR) workforce. PLoS ONE12(2): e0170887.
32.
HylandK (1996) Writing without conviction? Hedging in science research articles. Applied Linguistics17(4): 433–454.
33.
JanákDKlobuckýR (2014) Co bychom věděli o sociologii, kdybychom četli pouze Sociologický časopis a Sociológii? Obsahová analýza dvou sociologických periodik od, sametové revoluce ‘do současnosti’. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review50(5): 645–670.
34.
KaridesMMisraJKennellyI, et al. (2001) Representing the discipline: Social problems compared to ASR and AJS. Social Problems48(1): 111–128.
35.
KhanSR (2019) Habits, canvases, and conversations: How I think about publishing. Sociologica13(1): 21–27.
36.
KřenMCvrčekVČapkaT, et al. (2016) SYN V4: Large Corpus of Written Czech. Distributed by LINDAT/CLARIAH-CZ digital library. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/11234/1-1846
37.
LamersWSEckNJWaltmanL (2019) Variations in citation practices across the scientific landscape: Analysis based on a large full-text corpus. In: Proceedings of 17th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics, Rome, 2–5 September, vol. 2, pp. 2121–2132. Rome: Edizioni Efesto.
38.
LamontMMolnárV (2002) The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology28: 167–195.
39.
LatourB (1987) Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40.
LeaheyEReikowskyRC (2008) Research specialization and collaboration patterns in sociology. Social Studies of Science38(3): 425–440.
41.
LeenhardtJ (1992) Writing and ‘scientific discourse’ in sociology. History of the Human Sciences5(1): 63–71.
42.
LepeniesW (1988) Between Literature and Science: The Rise of Sociology. Ideas in Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
43.
LeydesdorffLBornmannLCominsJA, et al. (2016) Citations: Indicators of quality? The impact fallacy. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics1: 1.
44.
LynnFBNoonanMCSauderM, et al. (2019) A rare case of gender parity in Academia. Social Forces98(2): 518–547.
45.
McCartneyJL (1970) On being scientific: Changing styles of presentation of sociological research. The American Sociologist5(1): 30–35.
46.
MartinFJohnsonM (2015) More efficient topic modelling through a noun only approach. In: HacheyBWebsterK (eds) Proceedings of Australasian Language Technology Association Workshop, Parramatta, Australia, December 2015, pp. 111–115. Australasian Language Technology Association.
47.
MillerCR (1984) Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech70(2): 151–167.
48.
MillsCW (2000) The Sociological Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
49.
MoodyJ (2004) The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American Sociological Review69(2): 213–238.
50.
NederhofAJ (2006) Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics66(1): 81–100.
51.
NešporZR (2014) Padesát let české sociologie náboženství na stránkách Sociologického časopisu. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review50(5): 735–752.
52.
OakleyA (1998) Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology32(4): 707–731.
53.
OromanerM (2008) Intellectual integration and articles in core sociology journals, 1960–2000. American Sociologist39(4): 279–289.
54.
PayeSRenisioY (2017) Un gouvernement à distance des modes de production savante? L’articlisation de 36 disciplines au prisme du Research Excellence Framework (Royaume-Uni, 1992-2014). In: BenninghoffMCrespyCCharlierJ-É, et al. (eds) Le gouvernement des disciplines académiques: Acteurs, dynamiques, instruments, échelles. Paris: Éditions des archives contemporaines, pp. 205–232.
55.
PlattJ (2007) The women’s movement and british journal articles, 1950-2004. Sociology41(5): 961–975.
56.
PlattJ (2016) Using journal articles to measure the level of quantification in national sociologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology19(1): 31–49.
57.
PontilleD (2003) Authorship practices and institutional contexts in sociology: Elements for a comparison of the United States and France. Science, Technology, & Human Values28(2): 217–243.
58.
PudovkinAIBornmannL (2018) Approximation of citation distributions to the poisson distribution. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management12(1): 49–53.
59.
RichardsonL (2002) Writing sociology. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies2(3): 414–422.
SchwemmerCWieczorekO (2020) The methodological divide of sociology: Evidence from two decades of journal publications. Sociology54: 3–21.
62.
ScottJC (1990) Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
63.
ShapinSSchafferS (1985) Leviathan and the Air-pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life; Including a Translation of Thomas Hobbes, Dialogus Physicus De Natura Aeris, by Simon Schaf. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
64.
SkovajsaM (2014) Celková a zahraniční citovanost ‘Sociologického časopisu’: výsledky citační analýzy. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review50(5): 671–712.
65.
SkovajsaMBalonJ (2017) Sociology in the Czech Republic: Between East and West. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.
66.
SmithDE (1990) The Conceptual Practices of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge (The Northeastern Series in Feminist Theory). Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
67.
StrakováJStrakaMHajičJ (2014) Open-source tools for morphology, lemmatization, POS tagging and named entity recognition. In: BontchevaKZhuJ (eds) Proceedings of 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: System Demonstrations. Baltimore, MD: Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 13–18.
68.
TenglerováHHásováVOliveriusV (2020) Postavení žen v české vědě: Monitorovací zpráva za rok 2018. Praha: Národní kontaktní centrum – gender a věda.
69.
ThompsonGYiyunY (1991) Evaluation in the reporting verbs used in academic papers. Applied Linguistics12(4): 365–382.
70.
TurnerJH (2016) Academic journals and sociology’s big divide: A modest but radical proposal. The American Sociologist47(2): 289–301.
71.
VohralíkováL (2002) O čem psali a bádali čeští sociologové v devadesátých letech 20. století. Sociologický časopis / Czech Sociological Review38(1/2): 139–151.
72.
WardKBGastJGrantL (1992) Visibility and dissemination of women’s and men’s sociological scholarship. Social Problems39(3): 291–298.
73.
WatsonA (2016) Directions for public sociology: Novel writing as a creative approach. Cultural Sociology10(4): 431–447.
74.
WolfeA (1990) Books vs. articles: Two ways of publishing sociology. Sociological Forum5(3): 477–489.
75.
WuchtySJonesBFUzziB (2007) The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science316(5827): 1036–1039.
